against it.
Thoughts?
-Donald
--
Ivan
the modules (with
the user prompts) and then setting load=false.
-Donald
Ivan wrote:
Shall we provide a page, it has some shortcut buttons, such as Turn
On/Off EJB Support Turn On/Off JMS Support , that while users do not need
some functions, they could conveniently turn off those functions
are executed against it.
Thoughts?
-Donald
--
Ivan
Hi:
I will re-search the newest codes, and if no similiar issues exists, I
think we could close it.
Thanks !
Ivan
2008/9/25 Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of the patches from Ivan in G4081 have been applied to trunk.
Are there anymore patches needed or can we close
assembly via transitive dependency, similar like
dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6 today.
Lin
--
Ivan
/dojo.js, have I missed anything ?
2008/10/14 Jay D. McHugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ivan,
Have you had a chance to try a newer snapshot?
Is Dojo showing up in the correct location for you?
Jay
Ivan wrote:
Just find in the newest snapshot, after I manually install the dojo
plugin,
it has
I guess the dojo webapp is deployed with the web context dojo, so
http://localhost:8080/dojo ---(webapp context) / dojo --
(parent folder) / dojo -- (sub folder, which has a brother folder dijit)
/ dojo.js
2008/10/15 Jay D. McHugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ivan,
The location that you
Affects Versions: 2.1.3
Reporter: Ivan
Attachments: Geronimo-4353.patch, snapshot.JPG
Currently, different portlets uses different way to show those error
messages to the end user. We need a uniform way to do it. The simliar issue
is opened in GERONIMO-2621
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4353
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public(Regular issues)
Components: console
Affects Versions: 2.1.3
Reporter: Ivan
Attachments: Geronimo-4353.patch, snapshot.JPG
1.1.x or 1.2 releases without having to port this
proposed change over and repackaging Dojo.
If you can't find a solution that doesn't require you to modify the Dojo
released tar/zip bundle contents, then this feature should be canceled in my
opinion.
-Donald
Ivan wrote:
Thanks
setting, if null is
returned, we could invoke oldConguration.getAppConfigurationEntry(name).
Or do we have a reason that we should not retrieve the configuration
from JVM's Setting ? Thanks !
--
Ivan
Thanks for the history story, I opened a JIRA
*GERONIMO-4379https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4379for
it, and I will post a patch soon.
*
2008/10/27 David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 26, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Ivan wrote:
Hi:
While configuring the JAAS Login in the Geronimo
existed in database pool.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
--
Ivan
.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch committed to branch 2.1 + trunk (see revisions under subversion
commit tab)
Ivan, please generate patch from the root dir in the future. Thanks for
the patch
Lin
The war exported as a geronimo plugin in admin console cannot be
installed
on GERONIMO-4395:
---
BTW, I forgot to mention - I think a better approach is to allow users to
config their own groupid (currently has to be console.db), version
(currently has to be 1.0) and artifactId, from the portlet page. Ivan, if
you like you are welcome
3 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Wed Nov 19 20:17:01 EST 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 155M/535M
[INFO]
--
Ivan
True, I have uploaded a file, please help to review it !Thanks !
2008/11/20 Jason Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for catching that, Ivan. Could you submit an updated patch to the
appropriate jira for the necessary tweak to fix the 2.0 branch?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Ivan [EMAIL
to the values of the MTOM
annotation.
If I do not make a mistake and the way is reasonable, I would like to open a
JIRA and work on it.
Thanks for any comment !--
Ivan
Reporter: Ivan
Priority: Minor
Provider interface is an important part for web service, especially for
Restful web service. Currently, no related testcases exist in our testsuite.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email
)
... 22 more
---
--
Ivan
Hi, Kan Ogawa:
The Jeff's patch is for version 2.2.
If you would like to provide the property files for 2.1 version, I think
you may open a JIRA for 2.1.
Thanks !
2008/12/29 Kan Ogawa super-cr...@jcom.home.ne.jp
Hi Ivan,
Our Japanese contributors, Japan Apache Geronimo Users Group
-starup%29-td20472233s134.html
--
Ivan
configuration
Reply-To: u...@geronimo.apache.org
On Jan 13, 2009, at 8:32 PM, Ivan wrote:
I was always thinking that shall we have a better way to handle all the
available setting provided by the third-party modules? As we all know,
usually, all the GBeans only delegate those important
OK, I would like to do some investigation about it, maybe we could take use
of JexlExpressionParser in geronimo-system modules.
2009/1/15 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Jan 14, 2009, at 6:05 PM, Ivan wrote:
One way may be write a new property holder bean to replace the default one
to http://localhost:8080/activemq-console/
Try sending a message and looking at it using the atom feed :-)
thanks
david jencks
--
Ivan
framework so it is more plugin-at-a-time
rather than gbean-at-a-time
- see how that differs from the blueprint service, ee DI, and xbean-spring.
Try to support all of these at once.
Thoughts? Counter proposals? Anyone interested?
many thanks
david jencks
--
Ivan
Thanks very much, it is my honour to be the Geronimo committer. ^_^
2009/3/7 Jay D. McHugh jaydmch...@gmail.com
Congratulations!
Jay
Donald Woods wrote:
I would like to welcome Ivan aboard, as he recently accepted the
Geronimo PMC invitation to become a committer. His account was just
I will look at it, sorry !
Ivan
2009/3/13 ga...@apache.org
Geronimo Revision: 753214 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090313/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http
Oops, not sure why the case failed again in the tomcat build. Currently, a
pop out Dojo windows is used as the confirmation box, maybe the selenium
could not work correctly with Dojo in some scenarios. I will continue to
investigate it.
Ivan
2009/3/15 ga...@apache.org
If possible,
I wish that GERONIMO-4529) Corba port 1050 is not released after stopping
j2ee-corba-yoko configuration is included in 2.1.4.
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/3/18 Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net
I think we're at a point where we should freeze branches/2.1.4 in prep
One proposal :
Update the quartz plugin to the 2.1+ Geronimo
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4140
Ivan
2009/3/20 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
Two proposals for this program:
1, To make a glassfish -- geronimo migration tool
2, To test a bunch of most popular JEE apps like
in it, maybe you need to
register in the google's website.
Thanks!
Ivan
2009/3/31 Мартин Бенков martinben...@gmail.com
Hello,
I'm willing to attend SoC this year. I have 3 years experience with java
and year and a half with J2EE(I've worked
Shall we still have a chance to add an additional fix ? Please refer to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4609
Ivan
2009/4/2 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
too late to make a difference but as a gesture of encoragement
+1
david jencks
On Mar 26, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Joe Bohn
, I wish I could add some codes to the sandbox,
so that you could refer to them.
Could anyone give more comments on it ?
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/4/3 Мартин Бенков martinben...@gmail.com
Hello again,
I've read part of the documentation and downloaded the sources. I looked
mainly
in the embbed ActiveMQ
If possible, I wish some one could help to review it, not sure whether I
miss anything.
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/4/16 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
I agree that a 2.2 release would be nice to do to push out things
If possible, I would like to be involved in the server TCK progress. For I
am new in this area, not sure whether there are any points need to be care
while looking at those failed issues.Any comment ?
Ivan
2009/4/24 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
On Apr 22, 2009, at 2:50 AM, David
applications.
Right ?
Ivan
2009/5/20 Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com
One example that we did this is with the config-substitution property
file where we allow users to specify configuration and the server
reads the config-substitution property file during the startup of the
server. If we more
Hi,
While buiding the Geronimo 2.2-SNAPSHOT, I found in the root pom.xml, the
XBean version is still 3.5 SNAPSHOT, is there any special reason ?
Thanks !
--
Ivan
it. The related
properties include TransformerFactory, DocumentBuilderFactory etc
Thanks for any comment !
--
Ivan
Thanks, David !
2009/5/23 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
I'm sure the reason is that no one noticed 3.5 was released.
We should change it to 3.6-SNAPSHOT
thanks
david jencks
On May 22, 2009, at 1:13 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
While buiding the Geronimo 2.2-SNAPSHOT, I found
will set the system property.
Ivan
2009/5/24 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On May 23, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi
Currently, I am working on the JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4623.
The issus is caused by the implementation search, the solution I could
It seems that it is caused by the new module xbean-asm-shaded is added in
XBean 3.6 snapshot.
I will search those dependencies.xml files and add it.
Ivan
2009/5/24 ga...@apache.org
Geronimo Revision: 778125 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http
/OPENEJB-892
I will revert the changes if we find a better way to do it.
Ivan
2009/5/24 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On May 24, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Ivan wrote:
It seems that it is caused by the new module xbean-asm-shaded is added in
XBean 3.6 snapshot.
I will search those
*?J2EEApplication=org.apache.geronimo.plugins/console-tomcat/2.2-SNAPSHOT/car,WebModule=portal-driver.war,j2eeType=GBean,name=CARExportForward
So is it the correct behavior, I guess that some JIRAs are caused by
this.
Thanks for any comment !
--
Ivan
Thanks, David.
Not yet. I think it is caused by the moduleName created by the
ModuleBuilder. For while adding sub gbeans, moduleName is always used to
create the abstractName.
I will try jetty later.
Ivan
2009/5/25 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
That seems like a bug to me... it's probably
I tried it with 2.2-jetty, the same result with 2.2 Tomcat :-(
2009/5/25 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Thanks, David.
Not yet. I think it is caused by the moduleName created by the
ModuleBuilder. For while adding sub gbeans, moduleName is always used to
create the abstractName.
I will try jetty
Seems good features for 2.2. I suggest to open JIRAs to track them, and I
remember that some of them already have JIRAs opened.
Ivan
2009/5/28 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
Here are some things I really really want in 2.2. Since my main focus at
the moment is getting the incipient 3.0
]
--
Ivan
In the dependencies.removed.xml file, it wrote that xbean-finder shoud be
removed.
I attached the treeListing.xml file.
Ivan
2009/5/29 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On May 29, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
I'm looking for a way to shutdown the dependencies checking because I saw
I will take a look at those issues, it may be caused by some patches
committed by me.
Sorry for that !
Ivan
2009/5/31 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
IIUC this is most likely caused by one of three commits
780269 something about XSSXSRFFilter
780368 something about DeploymentPortlet
This should be fixed after applying the revised patch from Rex Wang, not
sure why those cases still failed. :-(
Ivan
2009/6/1 ga...@apache.org
Geronimo Revision: 780611 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1
Seems there is a typo error in the patch, I will correct it.
Ivan
2009/6/1 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
This should be fixed after applying the revised patch from Rex Wang, not
sure why those cases still failed. :-(
Ivan
2009/6/1 ga...@apache.org
Geronimo Revision: 780611 built with tests
that the EJBDeploymentGBean of an EJB is not
security-enabled. In the current codes, the value seems always set to true.
Thanks !
--
Ivan
Does the beta-4 work correctly now ? What is the expected behavior in
building geneisis with beta-4?
What does source archives are being built twice mean? While building the
genesis on my machine, I did not see any odd thing (Maybe I missed
something)
Ivan
2009/5/31 David Jencks david_jen
I remember that in server.xml, datasouce could be defined. While importing
the xml file, shall we also need to create rar configuration for them?
Ivan
2009/6/4 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
On Jun 2, 2009, at 6:46 PM, David Jencks wrote:
snip
I played with something like
Thanks, David, I have changed some codes about EJB security, for it made
some cases failed. Currently, I use whether securiy segment exists in the
deployment plan to decide that , JACC Manager is or not need to be created.
Ivan
2009/6/10 David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
On Jun 2, 2009
Ivan,
On Jun 9, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Ivan wrote:
Thanks, David, I have changed some codes about EJB security, for it made
some cases failed. Currently, I use whether securiy segment exists in the
deployment plan to decide that , JACC Manager is or not need to be created.
I think that's what we
Good news !
2009/6/12 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
Vote has passed with 4 binding +1 votes from
djencks
dwoods
jaydm
rickmcguire
and no other votes.
I'll promote the artifacts and move the sites to their permanent locations.
many thanks
david jencks
--
Ivan
] Finished at: Sun Jun 14 23:34:06 EDT 2009
[INFO] Final Memory: 54M/352M
[INFO]
---
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/6/14 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
I pushed a snapshot of our new tomcat build earlier today and just
committed
See, I got those artifacts from that url, So do we need to add this url to
the pom.xml of Geronimo's root folder. I found that it is comment out in
that file ?
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/6/15 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Jun 14, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Ivan wrote:
In which snapshot site, I could
, then I could build the whole Geronimo server.
By the way, the server failed to start, I am trying to find why.
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/6/15 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Jun 14, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Ivan wrote:
See, I got those artifacts from that url,
which artifacts from which url
a plan.xml?
Seems like all of these default/... wars want to mount under
/WebApp_ID... forcing me to make a plan for them, just to set the context.
Is this how it always worked?
--jason
--
Ivan
Why does the new Apache snapshot site is not in the remote repository list,
since it is in the root Apache 6 pom file.
Ivan
2009/6/16 ga...@apache.org
Geronimo Revision: 785086 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server
its id.
Ivan
2009/6/16 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Jun 16, 2009, at 12:51 AM, Ivan wrote:
Why does the new Apache snapshot site is not in the remote repository list,
since it is in the root Apache 6 pom file.
Good question. Is there a settings.xml file on this machine
For in the root Apache 6 pom file, a snapshot site has a same id of
apache.snapshots, which points to a new site :
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/6/16 Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
Why is apache.snapshots old and apache.people.snapshots is new?
--jason
On Jun
I did not notice that, seems that we could remove the people site.
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/6/16 Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
The head of http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/ states:
snip
NOTE: Some projects have moved their snapshots to a new repository at
http
Hi,
I got the news from OpenEJB maillist, that the version number in the
trunk is updated to 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT, so I wish that in Geronimo 2.2-SNAPSHOT,
we could use 3.1.2.
Any comment ? If no objection, I will update it.
Thanks !
--
Ivan
: org.apache.activemq:activemq-parent for
project: null:activemq-core:bundle:null for project
null:activemq-core:bundle:null
--
Ivan
Yes, I think we need. For some EJB cases failed, and it may be related to
the OpenEJB.
2009/6/18 Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net
Ivan wrote:
Hi,
I got the news from OpenEJB maillist, that the version number in the
trunk is updated to 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT, so I wish that in Geronimo 2.2-SNAPSHOT
Why is apache.snapshots (
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository) in the log ?
Ivan
2009/6/18 ga...@apache.org
Geronimo Revision: 785862 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090617/build
nexus site, right ?
And if does, shall we need to add a pluginManager definition in the geronimo
pom file ?
Thanks !
2009/6/18 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Why is apache.snapshots (
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository) in the log ?
Ivan
2009/6/18 ga...@apache.org
Geronimo
I mean the pluginRepositories definition, not pluginManager :-)
2009/6/18 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
I found that the pluginManager definition in the genesis 2.0 is
apache.snapshots (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository).
But those 2.2 artifacts are in the new nexus site.
So I
we shouldn't be using many snapshot plugins that we
aren't building...
This particular problem might require some kind of bootstrap to build the
car-maven-plugin before trying to use it? Or just trying to build twice?
Ivan :
I will try it.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 17, 2009, at 8
While building 2.2, some jetty7 classes can not compiled, seems that some
Jetty7 API is changed in the new snapshot.
2009/6/18 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
2009/6/18 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
This might be reason for genesis 2.0.1. I imagine that pointing to the
new repo would work
Yes, Geronimo 2.2 snapshot daily building does not work correctly recently
due to the snapshot repository changes.
Ivan
2009/6/18 Juergen Weber webe...@gmail.com
Hi,
the geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest
After some investigation, the compile error is caused by the OLD Jetty 7
SNAPSHOT in its snapshot site, the newest one is built on June 8th.
Is it possible that we could build those 3-rd party projects locally on the
daily build machine before the Geromimo 2.2 build ?
Ivan
2009/6/18 Ivan xhh
It is blocked by other third-party projects, they did not publish the latest
snapshot to the snapshot site.
We are trying to find a workaround.
Ivan
2009/6/18 Juergen Weber webe...@gmail.com
So, could somebody please fix this so one could once again download current
binary snapshots?
Thanks
It is in http://repository.apache.org/snapshots. But this site is in the
root pom file, it should not have problem in downloading this module.
Ivan
2009/6/18 Jason Dillon ja...@planet57.com
My trunk build keeps puking on:
snip
Missing:
--
1
Hmm, I committed the wrong changes, I will update it. :-(
Thanks for pointing it !
Ivan
2009/6/18 Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:12 AM, xuhaih...@apache.org wrote:
Author: xuhaihong
Date: Thu Jun 18 14:12:45 2009
New Revision: 786071
Good news is that, Jetty7 published its newest snapshot (6/18) just now. I
added some workaround changes to the POM file.
Hopefully, we will see the build tomorrow.
Ivan
2009/6/18 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
That was the last time that trunk could be built successfully
As Ivan stated
Does anyone have any idea about this error ?
I found that if I manually moved the system-database to the top of the
plugins/pom.xml, this error would disapper. But not know why ?
Ivan
2009/6/19 ga...@apache.org
Geronimo Revision: 786340 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log
Once the system-database is on the top of connector, the problem will
disappear. I have no idea about this error. I will move it, and a comment
there.
Ivan
2009/6/19 Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com
Guess it might be caused by the dead-loop or something like this when
maven reactor build order
It is easy to add the SSL connector, the things that Jack concens is that,
how do the changes affect other components, I think.
Ivan
2009/6/19 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:31 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
Looks like this is going be a piece of non-trivial work
to its release
repository, where those M3 modules could be downloaded. Once the M4 is
published, we will recover the configuarations.
Any comment ?
Thanks !
--
Ivan
that
we could track them clearly.
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/6/20 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
After fixing the HostGBean in web app plan problem I don't have a very
clear idea of what's missing here. If one of you do could you please list
in detail what needs to be done?
thanks
david jencks
Hi,
I found the detailed results link
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html;
could not be opened.
Not sure where those extra configurations are needed. Could anyone help
to figure it out ?
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/6/20 ga...@apache.org
Geronimo
2009/6/22 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Jun 19, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Ivan wrote:
Currently, what I can see are
1. Recover those configurations that we used for Tomcat in the server.xml
For connectors, I may have done most of this in my work for (3) could
use some checking
2009/6/22 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Jun 21, 2009, at 10:20 PM, Ivan wrote:
2009/6/22 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On Jun 19, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Ivan wrote:
Currently, what I can see are
1. Recover those configurations that we used for Tomcat in the server.xml
for
Tomcat's default setting, which uses users.xml.
So far, I did not see any effect to our existing console applications, I am
not sure whether we need to recover it. IMO, keep the current way is better.
Any comment ?
Ivan
2009/6/22 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
2009/6/22 David Jencks david_jen
that we need to keep
them ?
Thanks !
--
Ivan
I applied a missed patch for EL to the Tomcat Ext modules, it is not
published to Apache.snapshot.
Please help to republish it, thanks !
--
Ivan
Thanks, Jarek !
2009/6/24 Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com
I just pushed a new snapshot. Hopefully, I didn't screw up anything.
Jarek
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote:
I applied a missed patch for EL to the Tomcat Ext modules, it is not
published
, in the recent sample build log, it
shows the simliar build error, but for other modules.
I checked the logs of maven and those POM files, so far, I still have no
idea about it. Wish someone could give a hand, thanks !
--
Ivan
Hmm, I never know I could do it :-(.
I will try it next time if needed.
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/6/24 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
I started a deploy, should be done in a couple of minutes.
As a geronimo committer you should be able to deploy snapshots, is there a
permission problem?
mvn
For Dojo 0.4.3, debug-portlet is still using it.
For 1.1.1 dojo-mini, I remember that all the unuseful files are removed from
it, it is created there for reduce the size of Geronimo binary file.
Ivan
2009/6/24 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
The svn repo is a terrible idea and violates
Yes, without moving this, an error will occur in the build process, which
says that the taglib version for pluto is not found.
Ivan
2009/6/25 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
What is your reasoning for moving the import dependency? I was thinking
that we should minimize the exposure
]
[INFO] Total time: 20 minutes 11 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Thu Jun 25 09:24:30 EDT 2009
[INFO] Final Memory: 300M/563M
[INFO]
--
Ivan
We will move from SVN to Git for Geronimo?
Ivan
2009/6/27 Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com
All,
FYI, I just created INFRA-2115
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2115) to add Git mirrors
for Geronimo and its sub-projects. Please update it with additional
mirrors in case I missed some
Thanks for your remainder !
Ivan
2009/6/29 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
Ivan, just a friendly reminder to please run a complete server build (with
junit tests) and testsuite before committing patches. There have been
several build breaks in the past couple weeks due to patches you have
with its function. I agree that we should
change it to be more valid.
Ivan
2009/6/30 Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com
Hi,
While debugging the console testsuites I realized that the admin
console was no longer prompting when uninstalling a given module (or
stopping or restarting). I tracked down
1 - 100 of 2094 matches
Mail list logo
