+1 (am keen to use this on ActiveMQ ASAP :)
On 6/15/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
--jason
On Jun 14, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have pushed new XBean 2.4 binaries in a private repo for review.
They are available at
(though its worth adding this is for the board to decide)
On 6/16/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
IMO ActiveMQ deserves TLP status.
--jason
On Jun 16, 2006, at 12:24 AM, James Strachan wrote:
+1.
On 6/15/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 15, 2006, at 1
On 6/16/06, jhakim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clearly both setObject(name, map) and setObject(name, mapMsg) work. As you
correctly point out, using a hierarchical naming scheme would allow the
client to specify nesting and works with any MOM.
However, I would argue that forcing clients to write
-message-properties-and-mapmessages.html
On 6/16/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/16/06, jhakim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clearly both setObject(name, map) and setObject(name, mapMsg) work. As you
correctly point out, using a hierarchical naming scheme would allow the
client
I replied on the other thread :) basically ActiveCluster
On 6/21/06, Komandur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is any group membership protocol implemented as part of ActiveMQ ?
(I have seen references to ActiveCluster, and would like to know if AMQ
uses it for any of the configurations).
+1
On 6/21/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my +1
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 6/20/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have uploaded binaries for the 3.0-M2-incubating release.
The repos and site are available at
It'd be nice to get the Tomcat-contributed stuff into a maven repo so
we can just share - but in the meantime #1 sounds fine to me.
On 6/28/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#1 works for me.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 6/28/06, Greg Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Jeff, Bill and I
On 6/28/06, Greg Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
It'd be nice to get the Tomcat-contributed stuff into a maven repo so
we can just share - but in the meantime #1 sounds fine to me.
Well the geronimo-specs stuff builds with m2 so it should be trivial to
have
I just experienced a temporary glitch in the m2 build when making
activemq-web-demo. If this has failed for you today you might wanna
try the following which fixed it for me...
rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin/
--
James
---
On 6/26/06, ngcutura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am working on LDAPAuthorizationMap to enable use of LDAP for storing
access privilege information. The project I am engaged in requires dynamic
creation of destinations and users so external source of authentication and
authorization
On 6/29/06, ngcutura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for reply.
There is no bean class=com.acme... ... in security example but this is
quite important.
Thats just a way to instantiate some JavaBean using regular Spring style syntax.
Is there some default class like
I've found performing
rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/com/sun/
really helped. It seems that there are some clashes of m2 poms around
the place in different repos around the JAXB-API and JAXB-impl jars
which can mess things up pretty well.
Many thanks to Guillaume for helping me figure that out on IM
Where's the Apache copyright header?
Also I'm not sure if we can include support for JBoss SwiftMQ to the
m2 performance plugin. These would have have to be hosted outside of
Apache AFAIK such as maybe in the Mojo project.
On 6/30/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jgapuz
On 6/30/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Tim Bish and I are just about ready with the new C++ library. It
currently will only serve as a replacement for CMS (stomp C++ client),
but it's architecture supports pluggable connectors, so merging in the
openwire-cpp client code
I've added support for a Destination interface which makes it easier
to work with destinations (endpoints) in JBI from a client API rather
like working with Destinations in JMS.
You can create a destination from a URI then use it as a factory of
MessageExchange / Message objects to simplify
On 7/3/06, Grant McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have recently had the need to submit several patches
Thanks for those Grant!
and have been quickly
becoming familar with the servicemix code base. As such I was wondering
what was necessary to become a contributor?
There's some
On 7/3/06, Grant McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have any particular areas that you're targetting for the next
milestone release?
The roadmap is generally defined in JIRA...
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
On 6/30/06, Hossam Karim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent, Thanks Guillaume and James.
I have two comments:
- James, does the client API intentionally allow invoking a service without
specifying an operation?
So the URI could include the operation name via 'operation:...
On 7/3/06, Renaud Bruyeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
The ServiceMixClient - if its dependency injected with a JBI container
instance -
The doco does not explain how to do this: inject the JBI container.
Most of the time I want to use the client I am inside a service unit
While perusing JIRA I spotted this issue again...
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-688
I know its an issue close to folks at Amazon's hearts.
Dealing with slow consumers is a fascinating problem for a messaging
system; its quite a tricky problem :). Here's some background on the
On 7/4/06, Lalit Nagpal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am a absolute new starter in the field of MOM although I worked on MQ
Series sometime back.
Welcome! :)
But totally new to ActiveMQ ... need to pick up on
ActiveMQ.
Can somebody guide me as to how to get started on this.
I'd start
have any other use cases or requirements?
On 7/3/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While perusing JIRA I spotted this issue again...
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-688
I know its an issue close to folks at Amazon's hearts.
Dealing with slow consumers is a fascinating
We had a bunch of test cases in the assembly module that were not
being executed in the m2 build for some reason; its also for legacy
reasons they were there, they are better suited to being closer to the
actual code they test so I've just moved them to the activemq-core
project.
So don't panic
On 7/7/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah - actually we might want to do something like :
* container
* core tooling (just currently the jbi-maven-plugin)
* components
* archetypes
* other tooling like web applications, portal stuff, high end tools,
eclipse tooling etc
Since the
Hi Stephs
On 7/7/06, stephans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
i am currently writing my master thesis on improving filter performance in
publish/subscribe environments.
Interesting! :)
Can anyone of you outline how filtering is
done in activemq, i.e. if you are using the counting
On 7/10/06, srsprasad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to get the List of Queues or Topics presently active in Broker.
A code sample will really help me alot.
Thanks in advance...
The FAQ has lots of useful information
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/faq.html
e.g.
I've just applied 2 trivial bug fixes to the xbean-spring module of XBean.
The first is a patch from Guillaume which is a one liner to create the
xml parser using a helper method (used by all the other
ApplicationContext implementations).
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-21
The other
On 7/12/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to check the XBEAN-22 patch and fix
the related XBEAN-19 feature in this release ?
The XBEAN-22 is about enhancing the current class loader in xbean-server
with the work the Dain did in Geronimo. This will allow to
On 7/13/06, Charlesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this links not open. Internal Server Error
Temporary wiki failure
You can see them on the FAQ on the website too..
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/faq.html
e.g.
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/why-does-my-sender-not-send.html
The Stomp site has a list of the various language specific Stomp clients...
http://stomp.codehaus.org/Perl+Client
which points to this client...
http://zilbo.com/articles/activeMQ/index.html
On 7/13/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is any one aware of the location of the
On 7/13/06, Charlesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
somebody help? have source example?
I only implemented methods poll and transform.
this http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/why-does-my-sender-not-send.html
the method onMessageExchange implement, are in super().
You need to call done() to
Great!
Must be nearly time to cut a 4.0.2 release :)
On 7/14/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. look like there was not too much opposition to backporting this so..
I'll go ahead and do it later today.
On 7/11/06, Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 - sounds good to me
On
On 7/15/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noticed these in the m1 and m2 snapshot repositories. Any reason for them?
My bad. It was a temporary workaround for bad file permissions in the
repos causing me to not be able to deploy things.
Since I can't chmod, I could only create a copy
On 7/17/06, ngcutura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James.Strachan wrote:
Sounds great! I didn't see an attachment - I wonder it might be easier
if you raised a JIRA and attached your zip to the JIRA issue?
Attachment is hyperlinked below sentnece Attached is a zip archive with 4
files: in
BTW it was me - I'm always on the look out of a CI server we can use
on OSS projects :). I'll try get the builds working.
Does it really affect Geronimo if the builds fail? AFAIK build error
mail should be going to the Jencks Lingo projects?
On 7/17/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/17/06, Sepand M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to modify ActiveMQ so it can handle SSL connections
FWIW we already support SSL connections...
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/configuring-transports.html
in particular...
Sorry I've not responded to this thread yet - been a bit snowed on
other stuff. Yes I think we should be creating the destinations in
addConsumer() BTW.
The reason for the creation of the ActiveMQ.Advisory.TempQueue is I
think part of the usual advisory mechanism...
On 7/18/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/17/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about we just implement toString() on our Runnables, and our
thread pool can track that way? I really want to uncouple this code.
The problem is that if you forget that, or use one bit
On 7/18/06, Kelly Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks James,
I'm mentoring Sepand on this project within our company, so I'll try
to explain what we're trying to do. We want to use SSL client-side
certificates to provide the authentication mechanism rather than
user/pass or other
If we ever had a single reusable annotations library (for things like
@Mandatory, @OneWay etc) we could have an annotation @Description to
be used to annotate a property used for descriptive purposes in
logs/consoles/UIs
On 7/18/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/17/06, James
I'll move 'em elsewhere if you like; hopefully another open source CI
server that doesn't suck will show up some place soon
On 7/18/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 17, 2006, at 10:32 PM, James Strachan wrote:
BTW it was me - I'm always on the look out of a CI server we can
On 7/19/06, bmadigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the change to call lookup(...) in addConsumer( )?
Yes
Looks like its not
being called.
Damn - sorry about that. I knew I should have taken the time to write
a test case :). Lemme see if I get chance to write a little test case
On 7/20/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, are there any up to date docs on ActiveCluster?
The docs are still here...
http://activecluster.codehaus.org/
I haven't looked
at it since, er, 1.0? Is it still used anywhere?
Its not used that much right now. I think its only
in http://rafb.net/paste/results/h7qOVA70.html there's
// we may be removing the duplicate connection, not the
first connection to be created
if (oldValue == info) {
I'm just wondering about the == operator here. I guess the issue is
that a duplicate tries to add a
I think it should be fixed now - at least svn up and building worked
for me this morning. I wonder if this was just an omitted interface
when some work was committed?
On 7/20/06, bmadigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
clean install after updating this morning:
On 7/22/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are using the Geronimo transaction manager, you may want to
use the
org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.transactionlog.JDBCLog, which
stores the tx log in the database. This will allow you to support
full XA with a single non-xa jdbc
+1
FWIW I upgraded ActiveMQ to xbean 2.5 and spring 2.0-rc2 and it
generally worked fine (once I remembered to also upgrade the
maven-xbean-plugin version :).
I'll try make some time tomorrow to look into migrating jencks if
noone else dives in before me
On 7/24/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL
On 7/24/06, Lalit Nagpal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James-
I think people would also like to know what state Openwire is into and
whether they can proceed on openwire rather than stomp. If you could add a
little of that too it would be great.
OpenWire is complete and has been stable since
On 7/24/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
How would you guys feel if we follow servicemix's lead and switch to using
the org.apache.activemq group id and and incubator-4.1-SNAPSHOT as the
version number in our maven poms? It something that we will eventually need
to do any ways,
On 7/24/06, bmadigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks James,
looks good. Now I see what was wrong with the wildcard :)
:)
Is there a rough release date for the 4.1 codebase?
No - I'll start a separate thread on releases to try figure out whats
left to do to start thinking of doing a 4.1 etc
We've quite a few bug fixes ready to roll in 4.0.2 that its probably
about time we did a release pretty soon.
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
Also we've now got quite a few features in 4.1 (for a detailed view
click on
I wonder if we should create a wiki page somewhere of all the folks
who have signed the Sun NDA and their committer status on
geronimo/activemq/servicemix et al - so then when we create a new
mailing list (e.g. for servicemix) the moderator can check that only
the right folks are allowed to view
On 7/21/06, ngcutura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(hyperlinked file below)
http://www.nabble.com/user-files/72/LdapAuth.zip LdapAuth.zip
This is the best I could come up with. Please take a look at
LDAPAuthorizationMap.java and LDAPAuthorizationMap.xml. If they seem OK
please tell em the next
Agreed with everything said so far.
My favourite approach first would be to solve the problem for spring
users; then look at GBean or MBean(JBoss SAR) folks later on. So we
should be able to make a POJO thingy first then make it an MBean/GBean
later.
On 7/25/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/25/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not really see the point of having several different mechanism to
access the same objects.
If JMX is easier to use, let's use it.
This will also allow us to have a remote client easily, without relying on a
clustered flow.
We could
Sounds cool with me. I guess once we get to 4.1 we can use the maven 2
release plugin to make this kinda stuff easier
On 7/26/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just recently put up a ActiveMQ 4.0.2 release candidate for vote so while
it's fresh on my mind I'd like to see if
On 7/27/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding receive/acknowledge model in AMQ.
If there are 2 consumers (running on separate machines) connected to AMQ
server on the same queue. Consumer-1 receives a message and don't send
acknowledge. Is
I just responded to the other empty thread - thought I'd resend my reply...
On 7/27/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding receive/acknowledge model in AMQ.
If there are 2 consumers (running on separate machines) connected to AMQ
server on the
to a
number of actual physical destinations.
On 7/27/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've made a few changes to the virtual destinations feature...
http://activemq.org/site/virtual-destinations.html
Firstly I wanted to have out of the box support for virtual topics;
however I was a little
received any message in consumer-1 and all the
messages are still new.
Please advice.
See
http://activemq.org/site/i-do-not-receive-messages-in-my-second-consumer.html
Thanks!
Vik
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:30
This has been requested quite a few times in the past - the ability to
configure in the broker what destinations are available on startup.
I've finally added an implementation and test case to SVN HEAD to fix
AMQ-828.
The documention and an example is here...
On 7/27/06, Jerome Camilleri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
Thanks for the heads up! Do you have a link to the project?
No link because for the moment it's an internal project but we would
like to publish it.
Ah OK :)
Is your intention to create an open source project out
Thanks! :)
On 7/28/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was a bit sleepless tonight and I think I got most of the headers
converted. Committing since the changes should not cause any merge
conflicts (I doubt anybody else was editing the source headers.)
On 7/27/06, Hiram Chirino
On 7/28/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/28/06, cbourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James,
Thanks for the quick response.
We're new to JMS type messaging systems but have good C# skills. ActiveMQ
looks like it will fit the needs of our project perfectly.
Great. BTW we'd
On 7/28/06, cbourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James,
Thanks again for the help.
We've managed to get this to work now using the default settings for
ActiveMQ.
It works great for smallish (around 1k) but when we send larger binary files
(20Mb) then the library seems to just stop part way
I just figured out a way with NAnt to generate documentation for NMS
http://activemq.org/site/javadocs.html
which is then copied to where the ActiveMQ site is checked out locally
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/site/
so its easy to deploy to Apache via an svn commit. It'd be
Looks great to me! :)
On 7/31/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, let me explain or we could use URI or endpoint resolution to avoid
duplicating
some code.
Each component must implement the
ServiceEndpoint resolveEndpointReference(DocumentFragment epr)
method provided by the
On 7/31/06, ngcutura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Has there been any progress on this issue? I have the same need in my
project and am able to accept some work load to help this. (I was already
going to start it myself, aanyway ;-) )
Great! We *love* contributors :)
So it sounds like you
On 8/1/06, Naveen Rawat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I am using the binary version of ActiveMQ 4.0 broker and openwire cpp APIs
to interface my cpp server with the broker.
[ Openwire APIs being taken from -
svn co
On 7/31/06, ngcutura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have another requirement in my project (a tough one). Instead of using
username/password I want to use only certificate for both authentication and
authorization.
I see two approaches:
1. As JMS allows only (username, password) in
A. Bish
Sensis Corporation
-
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:49 AM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: auto-generating documentation for C++ client?
I just figured
On 8/1/06, Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume/All,
Currently, I am handling the config file for the BAM component using
XMLBeans/XSD. We can think of some cool way of dealing with it later... Hope
that's Ok with everyone.
FWIW I really like JAXB2 for this kind of thing. You
+1
Its got its own source tree, website and JIRA so I'd say it'd make
sense to have its own mailing lists too. Its also got quite active
lately :)
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While looking at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-28,
I was wondering if we should
Here's a little example using 4.1-SNAPSHOT where we use a regular
Spring 2.0 XML file but embed the declaration of the ActiveMQ broker
using an XSD which allows XML editors and IDEs like eclipse/IntelliJ
to smart complete the XML...
://svn.apache.org)
Is there some special permission that I need for submitting to that folder?
On 8/2/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/06, Nathan Mittler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
I've submitted the patch.
James - as it stands, Tim has some docs that are ready to go
I thought the NOTICE file for Derby was just that its ASF code? Or is
the specific Deby stuff that needs adding to the NOTICE file?
On 8/3/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hiram,
Is the NOTICE file correct? I believe you need a NOTICE for derby, at
least.
Also, the shell scripts in
I'm sure JMeter could work. I do like the idea of using a Maven plugin
like the ActiveMQ Maven plugin for performance testing - as we can
then run it inside a CI tool like Continuum...
http://activemq.org/site/activemq-performance-module-users-manual.html
which then deploys results in an XML
On 8/8/06, Jerome Camilleri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
About the process to donate CIMERO Bull plugin to serviceMix, we are
ready to do this now.
Perhaps CIMERO was the good opportunity to be include into the tooling
like G. Nodet talk about ?
Agreed!
What is the procedure ?
Bull and me
+1
On 8/8/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some NOTICE file issues were found in the 2nd release candidate of the
4.0.2 build. I have cut and RC 3 of the 4.0.2 build with the fixes
and it's available here:
.
James
On 8/9/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any experience of these 2 solutions to know which one is
the best to use when creating a windows/unix service?
http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/introduction.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/daemon
On 8/9/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both of these look like then use natives... which I don't really
understand. For windows... sure, but do they need natives for POSIX
systems?
Yes - they are used to do things like monitor, kill and restart JVMs
if they hang up etc.
--
James
On 8/9/06, Komandur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read the link, reread the thread I misunderstood the prefetch feature ...
the broker is pushing messages into the clientside pre-fetch buffers upto
the limit.
Here are some ideas, let me know what you think ...
1. can we use an 'elastic
On 8/10/06, Komandur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. can we use an 'elastic prefetch' buffer based on a sliding window (like
in TCP) - this reacts to client (mis)behavior
We could start with a prefetch of 1 and increase it over time for well
behaving clients. However it doesn't fix the problem
We've now got a new committer, Tim Bish who's been doing great work
with our previous new committer, Nathan Mittler on the C++ code for
ActiveMQ.
I never announced Nathan joining either (bad James!) so welcome to the
team Tim and Nathan!
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
On 8/10/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
It would be great if there was a tool that you could point to a number
of ActiveMQ servers, and it would give you status (up/down) as well as
statistics (defined destinations and queue length and whatnot) and
some management operations
On 8/10/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/10/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've got a web app which right now manages a single (currently local)
broker but it could easily be changed to use JMX to connect to a
remote broker. It allows you browse destinations
On 8/10/06, Pesochinskiy, Vadim (MSCIBARRA)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James,
One way to implement this, which I think will fit with current design is
to introduce a MessagePullCommand, which informs the broker that
consumer is ready to accept next message. When broker get this request
it
On 8/10/06, Komandur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this would be a great value add to Activemq. I have given some
thought to this
use case, and here is a proposal:
Phase 1:
Provide an aggregate view of 'producing' and 'consuming' capacities (treat
the Network of brokers as if it were a
On 8/10/06, Pesochinskiy, Vadim (MSCIBARRA)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a lot, this is great!!!
In the standard amq distribution there is this all-including jar called
incubator-activemq-4.0.1.jar.
I cannot make maven build this. I use the following command, which
creates all target jars
On 8/10/06, Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lingo's JMX over JMS was designed for this case - allowing easy
aggregation of MBean Servers - but allowing them to be viewed as one
logical MBean.
Or if you want to a little bit more generic - mx4j can allow you to
do aggregation (though that
On 8/11/06, Fateev, Maxim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James,
I'm looking into your change (430445) and don't understand how it solves
problem of slow consumer.
It doesn't solve the slow consumer problem - it was purely to allow
pull based delivery of messages for cases where you have few
On 8/13/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that nobody work on QDox since several months.
(see
http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-developing-QDox--tf705135r1.html)
Does anyone know of any replacement we could use to allow java 5 parsing ?
I was thinking of introducing real
or
backport-util-concurrent but you can still debug just fine.
On 8/15/06, Dan Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 8/13/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that nobody work on QDox since several months.
(see
http://www.nabble.com/Anyone
Ah - you are connecting on the default stomp port (61613) could you
try connecting on 61616?
On 8/17/06, Sudhakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use the .Net Message Service
API(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-dotnet/)
in C# to communicate to
On 8/17/06, Vadim Pesochinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wondering what would be the estimate date for 4.1 release?
Do we have an idea of when and what releases are going to happen?
How many more 4.0.x releases will we have?
Now that 4.0.2 is pretty much out (the vote on the Incubator PMC
That sounds fine - it doesn't really matter what header you use as the
'correlation token', you could make up your own header if you wish.
Though the reason I said to use JMSCorrelationID was that most well
behaving JMS services should always copy the JMSCorrelationID from any
incoming message
On 8/18/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure. If you have to put such a file in the deploy dir, it may conflict
with files to deploy, or may confuse the user.
I also think that a single configuration file would be handy, where all
directories would be configured.
Agreed.
On 8/18/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think that nobody will ever want to deploy xml files in a hot-deploy
directory ? I would not bet on that ;)
:)
I'm all for hot deploy :)
Often the hot deploy directories could be configured in the 'global'
config file (e.g. like
I replied to this one on the Stomp list
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-messages-are-not-redelivered-in-activemq-4.0.2-p5902314.html
On 8/18/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jeff Tupholme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: August 18, 2006 9:17:17 AM PDT
To:
Great stuff Philip!
More feedback as I start digesting this fully and reading this whole
thread but my first reaction is could we try to stick to standard
annotations where possible - such as those defined in JSR 250? e.g.
1 - 100 of 892 matches
Mail list logo
