David Jencks wrote:
I'm a complete beginner in clustering but I have some questions.
I can't tell if the master communicates with all slaves or only slave 1,
then slave 1 communicates with slave2, etc. My questions are biased a
bit towards a linked list/chain of slaves, which might
Im up for it.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I'll be there. I hear there's good BBQ at Austin. Anyone up for a road
trip?
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 13, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Who is planning on being at ApacheCon in Austin?
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the back end clustering. Use of the API should not give
any knowledge to underlying implementation except maybe configuration.
I'll have some time tonight to look at Gianny's code and perhaps a peek
at eCache so forgive my naive comments if I'm in a ditch :)
On Sep 12, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Jeff
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/14/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use ActiveMQ for communication and take advantage of its
broker network for failover?
I'd be better off leaving answering the question to Jeff, but here's
my take on Jeff's proposal that may answer your
--jason
On Sep 12, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I wanted to go over a high level design on a gcache cache component and
get some feedback, input and invite folks who are interested to join in.
..so here it goes...
The gcache will be one of several cache/clustering offerings
the
other slaves that its alive and then it's back in its proper order.
Keep in mind, an intermediate slave only really needs to notify the
master and other slaves that it's back.
Jeff
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 14/09/2006, at 10:58 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/14/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/13/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The code lives in sandbox/gcache. Its in it's early stages.
Could you describe what's already there? A wiki page would be of help,
too. Do you plan to convert these fancy ascii arts into UML diagrams?
I think
Jason Dillon wrote:
oooh wildcard imports... naughty :-P
Copy and paste from AMQ ;-)
You might also want to sick to a standard header, nix the html bits:
That was the Intellij template header :( It seemed to convert breaks to
p/
Jeff
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/15/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not like i need people going in an making
changes to gshell or other stuff I have in there... unless they want
me to
;-)
Just spot it and though it's marked with a smile I'd like to make it
clear and be sure *I*
Jason Dillon wrote:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
The JMS provider would be a pluggable comm strategy. For performance
reasons, I want to start with TCP communication.
Why do you think that AMQ will not perform well?
AMQ will perform well...its a great JMS
, at 4:07 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
The JMS provider would be a pluggable comm strategy. For performance
reasons, I want to start with TCP communication.
Why do you think that AMQ will not perform well?
AMQ will perform
Hey Bill,
I noticed that the pom in openwire now includes a dependency to
gcache-server. I think we want it the other way around. We want
gcache-server to depend on openwire.
Can we remove this dependency?
Jeff
Ahh...never mind. I removed it and there are no dependencies ;-)
Jeff
Jeff Genender wrote:
Hey Bill,
I noticed that the pom in openwire now includes a dependency to
gcache-server. I think we want it the other way around. We want
gcache-server to depend on openwire.
Can we remove
I am not supportive of forcing javadoc, and I would not like to make
that a reason for veto. If folks aren't following guidelines to good
coding practices and the code is illegible, then I think we can help
mentor following generally accepted practices. I have read a lot of
code and for 99% of
Kevan Miller wrote:
In my experience, the probability of good comments being added to code
post the initial commit is extremely low. If you think it would be good
to document more, how do you see that happening?
Be a nudge ;-) Your comments to Gianny about having a bit more doc for
the
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
+1
Jacek
On 9/18/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As we move back towards CTR, can we please adopt the practice of using
a JIRA for every code change we make, however small the code change
may be.
I hope with the exception of the sandbox...
Since
Cool stuff...that addition would be great.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
All,
I've got a couple plugin utility classes that include things like
adding a screen to a console when a plugin is first run, resolving
references to DB pools or GBeans from a plugin, and mangling a J2EE
module as its
Young whippersnapper...I turn 40 on Saturday...now where is that walker
of mine...
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/20/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
though I turned 30 today so not sure how much work I will get done in
my old age.
Happy birthday, Jason! Isn't it nice to be on the
Yes...commit it...this is a great foundation for SOA and ESBs (no web
container needed).
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've done some work on a new assembly that I've nicknamed Micro-G (I
know .. not very creative). The name that I'm using under
geronimo/assemblies is geronimo-framework. This is
I am arriving Tue afternoon.
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I know Dain is travelling this week and I can't remember if there was a
note on this. For those that will be at ApacheCon when will you be
arriving? It would be cool to get a community get together during the
hackathon?
I'm arriving
Yep...Tomcat too...
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Are you absolutely sure? How did you verify this?
I am skeptical since we use this switch the xml parser to xerces and
this is required to pass the tck.
-dain
On Sep 28, 2006, at 3:18 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
As I discovered yesterday, the
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/30/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to welcome James Strachan as the newest
member of the Geronimo PMC. We're very happy to have James joining us
to help with the oversight of the Geronimo project.
Well done, James!
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Oct 4, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Ok,
I got back to my hotel room and started to work...I turned on the TV
and Armageddon was on. The soundtrack was in English and the
subtitles in Danish. When someone said dial 911...the screen said
(something
Ok...thanks...I'll give it a shot.
Jeff
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 10/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you give a quick email to explain how to set up a plugin site,
what is needed, directory and xml layouts?
Just like a Maven 2 repo, except with a geronimo-plugins.xml
Jacek,
This would be great!
Jeff
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 10/9/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just like a Maven 2 repo, except with a geronimo-plugins.xml in the
root directory. The only files that are actually used by the current
plugin installer are the actual archives in
Great stuff...I look forward to seeing this.
David Jencks wrote:
I had a great conversation with Alex Karasulu at Apachecon about
integrating TripleSec into geronimo as a JACC provider. I think this
will be pretty easy to do and provide a very powerful security
management capability for
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 10/14/06, Brian Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest Liferay portal plugins are now available on.
http://geronimo.liferay.com/plugins
It'd be great if we can add it to the default list of available plugin
repositories for Geronimo 1.2 and on.
I think
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 10/16/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geronimoplugins.com is the same, so we should probably be consistent.
Would you explain (possibly again) why it is configured this way?
I am actually in agreement with you. I don't really know why it's
configured
Paul McMahan wrote:
Also, I worked on a Jetty version of the plugin but encountered some
problems with classloading that I think may be due to the Jetty
assembly pulling in Spring and/or cglib differently than the Tomcat
assembly? I saw a couple of emails go by last week about issues with
/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul McMahan wrote:
Also, I worked on a Jetty version of the plugin but encountered some
problems with classloading that I think may be due to the Jetty
assembly pulling in Spring and/or cglib differently than the Tomcat
assembly? I saw a couple
Software Architect
Liferay, Inc.
Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.
On 10/16/06 9:08 AM, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/16/06, Jeff Genender wrote:
Paul McMahan wrote:
Also, I worked on a Jetty version of the plugin but encountered some
problems
Awesome! Sounds like a great meeting and presentation!
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I had the opportunity to speak to some folks at the Atlanta JUG tonight
and thought I'd share the feedback.
First off, the JUG was held at the Atlanta Holiday Inn and was located
in two adjacent rooms. I
Congrats!
Alan Cabrera wrote:
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Vamsavardhana Reddy has
recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo
Committer. Vamsi has been submitting many great patches for
an embarrassing long time. The breadth of his patches is remarkable
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Thanks...I now officially dub thee Jeff Magnusson Jr. :)
I don't mean to be a stickler...but when I used that term (JEE5) on the
spec commitee, I really got lashed, so I try to be politically correct ;-)
On Oct 20, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Matt
Joe Bohn wrote:
I agree with Jeff that we should use JEE 5.
No...*Java* EE5 ;-)
How/Who is setting the protocol to 1.0? Did you step through the code
to see where its getting set?
Jeff
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Jeff,
I am attaching a file. Please take a look at the 'protocol'
shown by RequestProcessor. The protocol is set to HTTP/1.0, even though
the connectors
Ashish,
Now *this* I like to hear ;-)
You may wish to look at
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html, but
its a little out dated.
This link will bring you up to date on Geronimo specifically:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/apache-geronimo-v11-users-guide.html
Jules Gosnell wrote:
(2) The reason for the large number of dependencies is WADI's
pluggability. The dependency tree pulls in all of the s/w with which
WADI integrates, including AC/AMQ. However, the Geronimo integration
will only require a small subset of these deps to run. You'll need to
That is a great idea.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Team,
Just a suggestion/hint. Some pmc's use wiki to collect input from
everyone. Example see
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/BoardReports
Basically when it's time for the board report, usually the 3rd week
every 3 months. we create a
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer or PMC member since July, please
reply to this thread.
Thanks!
Jeff
Tim McConnell wrote:
3. For JEE 5 compliance, JSF 1.2 must now be part of the server runtime
stack. So, a GBean will be implemented for a JSF service (to start
necessary listeners, process JSF configuration parameters, etc, whatever
is required for JSF to function correctly), but that
Still missing Apachecon and speakers there. I spoke, as well as Aaron
and Bruce.
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Ken,
Here is the input from the community for the board report.
Geronimo Project - Board Report
JUGs and Conferences
JUGs at Atlanta, Virginia,
Jacek Laskowski, Bill Dudney and
Tomcat and Jetty architectures are completely different.
For Jetty an app can have multiple hosts, but in Tomcat the opposite is
true, where a host can have multiple apps. Their web app -- host
mappings are the exact opposite.
They each have their advantages and disadvantages. If you are
Can we make the doc a separate download? I think it would still be a
great thing for people to have locally.
Jeff
Hernan Cunico wrote:
We decided to remove the docs from the dist because of the size. The
Geronimo v1.0 doc was (still is) over 30 Mb.
In addition, most of the doc is
Hernan Cunico wrote:
It would be cool if we would only had to tell VH and port in the
deployment plan (easier for migration), then G should know how to apply
that conf to the specific Jetty or Tomcat containers used. This goes
along with the hope of not making the config.xml more complex ;-)
For Apache, I understand the CDDL is ok to distribute in binary form *only*.
See: http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
Joe Bohn wrote:
I mentioned in an earlier post that it appears our best option for
including JSTL 1.2 for Java EE 5 is to pick up the Glassfish JSTL
library. It is
Very cool stuff...
What is an HPG?
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I've been spending some quality time with Geronimo over the past couple
of weeks gathering some performance data for 1.1.1.
I've posted a PDF that I'd like your input on in terms of content,
questions, etc. I'd like to
I was building from trunk this morning and noticed that WADI is pulling
down LGPL jars into the G build:
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Geronimo Clustering WADI
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
I don't really like this solution. I really am against blocking logs
unless absolutely necessary since it potentially hides bigger
problems. Why don't you change the "Geronimo" in the Engine (in the
plan.xml of the config) to "geronimo" to help make this work?
Jeff
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Please don't put them in the same domain as the rest of the geronimo
mbeans. This will cause many TCK tests to fail and may result in name
collisions.
I agree with Dain as well.
-dain
On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:28 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I am trying to set
Can you please attach the stack trace? I didn't see it attached.
Jeff
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
That is exactly how I am setting it. The attached stack traced is
produced by changing 1 character in the EngineGBean!
Thanks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't
Rally round the flag...
I really like these dates and it gives us something to shoot for. These
seem very reasonable to me.
But...Drive to Five? Reminds me of my 2 hours commute ;-) hehe...
great stuff!!
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I've been noodling over our Java EE 5.0 release of Geronimo and
Paul McMahan wrote:
For my part I would like to help with the Tomcat v6 integration. I've
looked at the Tomcat work that Jeff did for Geronimo 1.x and am
hopeful that we can borrow from that design. I've been lurking on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and they're marching toward a v6 release which is
I would like to offer some important news:
We have just had a changing of the guard for Geronimo.
[ANNOUNCE and THANK YOU]
Ken Coar has decided to step down as PMC chair. I would like to
personally thank Ken for his dedication, time, and helping to share his
knowledge with us. Ken has done an
I don't see a runtime...is one needed?
Jeff
Paul McMahan wrote:
Ahh, nice genie ;-) I believe Tomcat will have everything we need.
I built the stuff from:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_2
and stashed a copy here:
Ok...let me try to whip together a 1.4.7-SNAPSHOT of the next week that
allows you to choose your jasper poison.
Jeff
Paul McMahan wrote:
On 11/21/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see a runtime...is one needed?
Jeff
Looks like the runtime stuff got rolled into tomcat6
now?
--jason
On Nov 20, 2006, at 8:10 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No it is not a relic. We needed this for jspc at one point... Might
be included now by the plugin automatically.
Yup...the plugin handles it now.
Jeff
/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.4.6 was a major overhaul. I believe the runtime is only needed during
the compile stage. So I think you can ditch it. Although you will find
out real quick if it's still needed ;-)
Jeff
Jeff Genender wrote:
Paul McMahan wrote:
Geronimo 2.0 will be using jetty and tomcat v6 which implement the new
JSP spec. I think that means that for Geronimo 2.0 we'll need a new
version of the jspc maven plugin that references the tomcat v6
artifacts instead of v5.5.15. Otherwise I think
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No it is not a relic. We needed this for jspc at one point... Might be
included now by the plugin automatically.
Yup...the plugin handles it now.
Jeff
Joe Bohn wrote:
Yes, I think we said almost the same thing. I was proposing to use
Tomcat (Jasper) for the jsp compilation for both Tomcat and Jetty even
though the Jetty runtime will most likely be using Glassfish. If you
can configure it such that we use Jasper for Tomcat and can
Excellent writeup Dave!
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Here is an initial stab at documenting how to use Gcache with Geronimo
for clustering.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Geronimo+Clustering+with+Gcache
The article still needs a bit of work and will be updated as the Gcache
debugging
... ;-) .
Thanks,
Lasantha
Jeff Genender wrote:
Ok...
I am pretty certain at this stage that the WebService annotation is not
getting processed. Can you point me to the code that handles this in
Axis2?
Thanks,
Jeff
Jeff Genender wrote:
Thanks...this is very helpful
Matt,
Its worth a shot to see if they will offer an open source license to the
project. That seems to be a good theme today ;-) ANyone want to
voulteer to contact em?
Jeff
Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Well, I'm not a SPEC representative, but you could probably ask
this question to SPEC itself.
in the Axis2. May be remote debugging
... ;-) .
Thanks,
Lasantha
Jeff Genender wrote:
Ok...
I am pretty certain at this stage that the WebService annotation is not
getting processed. Can you point me to the code that handles this in
Axis2?
Thanks,
Jeff
Jeff Genender wrote
Thanks...let me know...
Jeff
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Jeff,
Once this change [1] in Axis2 propagates to the m2 snapshot repo's (by
tomorrow AM). You can take remove the System.setProperty hack
thanks,
dims
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=515891
On 3/7/07, [EMAIL
Hi Marcos,
I think your help would be perfect, especially where you interest lies.
Let me find out about our Google Summer of Code status and see what we
can do.
Feel free to look in the sandbox at gcache. It is the basis of a
hub/spoke/star clustering framework.
Thanks,
Jeff
Marcos Hack
Vaio Salo (JIRA) wrote:
Attachment: rapesex.html
Wow...who ever woulda though JIRA would get spam...
I guess is had to happen sometime.
://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-devm=117397929613538w=2
Lin
Jeff Genender wrote:
Lasantha Ranaweera wrote:
Not exactly sure whether I am getting your problem exactly or not :-( .
Line 99 decides whether application archive contains WSDL file or not
(according to Axis2 builder
annotation (not sure
how to do that yet) and set the PortInfo's wsdlLocation property.
Thanks,
Lin
Jeff Genender wrote:
I think this is supposed to happen on deployment, not from a tool. If
Axis is not going to handle this, then this code will need to be
written
in the Axis2
reason why I propose to use the wsgen tool provided by sun.
Lin
Jeff Genender wrote:
Yup...filling in the PortInfo map with some of the WebService annotation
info (minimally the wsdl location) should get us past this issue.
If Lin doesn't do it I may give it a SWAG this morning.
Jeff
in
jaxws-war project.
Lin
Jeff Genender wrote:
I did some messing around with this, and it will definitely be a much
bigger job. I allowed it to find the wsdl by setting the location.
This worked, but unfortunately it sent the WSDL verbatim without doing
the specific ServiceRef
Dims,
I'll contribute, but I will be 2000 miles away...
Lets keep all up to date as I think I can help contribute in this area.
I have a good idea of what is missing (since I have been so entrenched
in it), so feel free to ping me.
Thanks,
Jeff
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Mar 18, 2007, at 3:22
Congrats Jarek!
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has recently accepted an
invitation to
Yeah these are sweet. Hiram, do you have the original psd or other
source files, so we can change 'em as we update our software.
Very cool!
Jeff
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Mar 26, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Fricken awesome dude!!!
I second that opinion. These are great Hiram!
Why do they need pgp signatures? That is new to me.
Do you mean SHA1 signatures?
For SHA1 sigs, they can use the sha1 program on minotaur.
They would need to do something like:
sha1 -q ./tomcat-whatever.jar ./timcat-whatever.jar.sha1
sha1 -q ./tomcat-whatever.pom ./timcat-whatever.pom.sha1
Congrats!
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The Apache Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Dain Sundstrom has
accepted an invitation to join the PMC.
Nuf 'said.
Welcome :-0
They just pushed some snaps so I think we need to make a few fixes.
Jeff
Rick McGuire wrote:
Rebuilding trunk from a fresh checkout with a clean M2 repository, I get
the following errors:
I fixed it AFAICT so you should update now. Hopefully I didn't break
anything ;-)
Jeff
Rick McGuire wrote:
Rebuilding trunk from a fresh checkout with a clean M2 repository, I get
the following errors:
Why not use a low level Valve to trap the HTTP call before a redirect
can occur?
Jeff
David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 17, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
Jarek and I have been struggling with an issue we encountered in
Geronimo's TomcatEJBWebService that has to do with how EJB web
McMahan wrote:
On Apr 17, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Why not use a low level Valve to trap the HTTP call before a redirect
can occur?
Jeff
Maybe there is some way to do that. But it looks to me like the
redirect occurs before the first valve is called. At least that's
Yup...thats a problem.
Jeff
Paul McMahan wrote:
On Apr 17, 2007, at 1:28 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Can you step through it and see where its occurring? We did a special
trick with the DefaultSubject vlave IIRC that had to inject it before
everything else. I recall we did something funky
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.
the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This vote will conclude Saturday April 21
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for
geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This vote will conclude Saturday
Hi Raymond,
I would like to see a deep integration.
Jeff
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Geronimo community.
As you may know, Tuscany is an Apache project under incubation to
provide an open source SOA infrastructure. For more information, you can
visit http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/.
+1
Sachin Patel wrote:
+1
-sachin
On Apr 26, 2007, at 2:38 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The 2.0-M5 binaries are available at
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M5-rc1
The binaries addressed a problem seen in 2.0-M4 which was subsequently
scrubbed where 2.0-Mn and 2.0-Mn-SNAPSHOT
Yes...I think the namespace should change.
Jeff
Jason Warner wrote:
I was looking through the code for the j2g migration tool that currently
resides in the sandbox. I noticed that for the XML conversion it seems
that it uses a namespace of http://www.ibm.com/j2g
http://www.ibm.com/j2g. Am
No worries...I bumped us up to 2.0.5. We should be good.
Jeff
Dan Diephouse wrote:
I was just talking to Dan Kulp and he mentioned that my latest commit
broke things for Geronimo because G is using JAXB 2.0.2 yet and this
commit depends on an API in JAXB 2.0.5. We're using this JAXB 2.0.5
Matt,
Sounds good. We should coordinate with the other projects to be sure we
can get stable versions of their artifacts as well.
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
There has been lots of work going on to get Geronimo 2.0 certified and
it seems like the light at the end of the tunnel is not an
I think there would be HUGE interest in this
We probably should come up with what needs to be done to do this.
Are you looking to start with the web tier and get a plugin working?
Jeff
sharrissf wrote:
Hello,
for those who aren't familiar with Terracotta it is a java clustering
Hi Matt,
I completely agree with your take. This has been how we have done this
in the past. This is just M6, not final, and its what we have been
doing. So you have my vote for making the branch now...I think its a
great time to do it.
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Branching for a 2.0-M6 is a
Go go go!
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Hey all, we've slipped into June as there's been lots going on. I'm
going to cut a branch to make a 2.0-M6 release. I know this is late
notice but I seem to have misplaced my superior administrative skills
somewhere and I can't remember where :)
I'm
Donald Woods wrote:
Congrats to everyone who has been heads down on the TCK.
BTW - Which assembly is at 100%? Is it the Tomcat+CXF+OpenJPA?
Yes.
Jeff
-Donald
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I created a 2.0-M6-rc1 binary set for you to take a look at. This
Milestone has passed
Is this only happening in Windows? I must admit I wrote this on a
Mac...if you can confirm, let me know and I (or Jason) shoul dbe able to
find the problem and squash this.
Jeff
Donald Woods wrote:
Did you mvn clean before rebuilding?
I'm still seeing weird behavior from the latest
Jason Dillon wrote:
On Jun 8, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Did you mvn clean before rebuilding?
I'm still seeing weird behavior from the latest jspc-maven-plugin on
Windows and SLED10 if I build individual modules by hand w/o running
mvn clean first, like its adding duplicate
Was it a cleanup issue?
Jeff
Jason Dillon wrote:
There is nothing attached to this mail... but Paul has given me an
example of the failure and I think I have fixed it with his help.
Can you try the latest snapshot, with mvn -U?
--jason
On Jun 8, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha
the correct behavior and the fix to this problem.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:13:45
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build failure Error parsing web.xml for .
Was it a cleanup issue?
Jeff
Jason Dillon
+1 they look fine from my perspective.
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed forward.
Voting concludes on Monday, June
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Oh yeah...here is my +1
On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others will proceed
+1
Kevan Miller wrote:
+1 binaries and source look good
--kevan
On Jun 8, 2007, at 11:06 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/
We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the
block and others
901 - 1000 of 1297 matches
Mail list logo
