Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote:
Just to give you some direct guidance, you probably should have shot
an email out to the group saying what do you guys do for testing
when more than one VM is involved or we have this idea for testing
in more than one VM, what do you think?
You are right,
Kevan Miller wrote:
On 11/17/05, *Dain Sundstrom* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1 Using JIRA for tracking progress of the ORB would be great.
We already have a CORBA component, so I suggest you create an Add an
ORB implementation issue that can be the
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Lars Kühne wrote, On 11/17/2005 3:19 PM:
On 11/17/05, *Dain Sundstrom* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1 Using JIRA for tracking progress of the ORB would be great.
[...] I suggest you create an Add an
ORB implementation issue
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote, On 12/6/2005 8:21 AM:
Optimally, we would be able to take the idl files directly from OMG.
They have published a set of idl files, which can be downloaded here:
http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/02-07-02 . These files
generally
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I want to extend an invitation out to all the OpenORB developers who
might be interested in helping out. Lots of great work out here!
I'm one of them, but I don't use Geronimo and I haven't looked at G's
architecture.
Some of these points have already been made in
Hi,
I'm having a hard time building the Trifork ORB in sandbox/freeorb. I'm
trying to follow /README-M2-BUILD.txt, but step 2 doesn't work for me.
When I try to compile specs/*corba, I get
geronimo-spec-corba mvn install
...
The plugin 'org.codehaus.mojo:maven-idlj-plugin' does not exist
:
Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote, On 11/15/2005 1:46 AM:
Lars Kühne wrote:
I'm having a hard time building the Trifork ORB in sandbox/freeorb.
I'm trying to follow /README-M2-BUILD.txt, but step 2 doesn't work
for me.
When I try to compile specs/*corba, I get
geronimo-spec-corba mvn install
On Jan 14, 2008 8:05 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008, at 4:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
What cleanup steps need to be taken with the yoko code now that it's
been made a subproject in Geronimo? The first obvious one would be
to remove the non-core components from the trunk. The
I assume tools will also live in CXF for the IDL-WSDL compilers. If
we keep our own copy (which I think is a good idea) we need to make
sure that our package name is different from theirs. I assume they
will eventually use o.a.cxf.something, but currently they are not:
I think it is time to consider publishing the 1.0 release so
there's finally an official release level to work from. I currently don't
have any work items I feel need to be done before a 1.0 release can get
created. I have a number of items I think need to get improved what I'd
prefer doing
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Yoko ORB 1.0 for your review
and vote.
[...]
Not enough time here to really test the artifacts and build an
opinion, but here are some minor review points.
* NOTICE file inside the jar's
11 matches
Mail list logo
