[jira] [Assigned] (GERONIMO-4350) Connection proxying to imitate DissociatableManagedConnection can easily cause problems

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dain Sundstrom reassigned GERONIMO-4350: Assignee: (was: Dain Sundstrom) > Connection proxying to imit

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release

+1 -dain

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5842) InternetAddress.parse fails on a valid address

(Regular issues) Components: mail Reporter: Dain Sundstrom The InternetAddress parser is restricting the local part to not have multiple dots in a row. Although this may be rfc822 compliant, email address on the internet can and do have multiple dot in the local part. For

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4350) Connection proxying to imitate DissociatableManagedConnection can easily cause problems

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dain Sundstrom closed GERONIMO-4350. Resolution: Invalid Assignee: David Jencks (was: Dain Sundstrom) The problem was

[jira] Closed: (XBEAN-111) Only register Converters with the VM when requested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dain Sundstrom closed XBEAN-111. Resolution: Fixed > Only register Converters with the VM when reques

[reflect] registering converters with the VM

Currently, we are registering our Converters with the VM PropertyEditorManager, and this is creating all sorts of problems for libraries like Spring and IDEs like netbeans. Our code has it's own registry and only a registers them with the VM as a convenience. As a compromise between those

[jira] Created: (XBEAN-111) Only register Converters with the VM when requested

Affects Versions: 3.4.2, 3.4.1, 3.4 Reporter: Dain Sundstrom Assignee: Dain Sundstrom Fix For: 3.4.3 Registering the Converters in xbean-reflect with the VM PropertyEditorManager creates lots of problems for some libraries and IDEs. Since xbean-reflect

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4350) Connection proxying to imitate DissociatableManagedConnection can easily cause problems

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12638652#action_12638652 ] Dain Sundstrom commented on GERONIMO-4350: -- I'm not sure I under

Re: Entropy, or the heat death of the geronimo code base

On Feb 28, 2008, at 3:07 PM, David Jencks wrote: A few years ago I read about an information based perpetual motion machine someone came up with. IIRC many people studied it for quite a while before realizing that the flaw was an assumption that erasing information was free. It turned out

[reflect] Object graph support

I've committed my initial work on build object graphs with xbean reflect. The code works, but I need to do more testing and a few more features are needed. I'm going to be on vacation for the next 10 days, and if you all decide to do another release of xbean for the quick fix Guillaume su

Re: Site Broken?

27 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Looks like we have been a bit lax lately about adding the releases to the site. David or Alan (not sure who is carrying the ball right now) can you add a blurb to the site http://geronimo.apache.org/xbean/ Thanks, -dain

Site?

Looks like we have been a bit lax lately about adding the releases to the site. David or Alan (not sure who is carrying the ball right now) can you add a blurb to the site http://geronimo.apache.org/xbean/ Thanks, -dain

Re: Releasing 3.3?

+1 -dain On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: On Jan 10, 2008 3:40 AM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We need a release of xbean for openejb 3.0-beta-2. So unless somebody objects, I'll cut one friday. +1 Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Integrating a third-party JTA

Other then code that attempts to cast the transaction manger to GeronimoTransactionManager (or other Geronimo transaction interfaces) it shouldn't be that difficult. The biggest issue will be if you want to use the Geronimo connector implementation, then you will have to figure out how to

Re: OSGifying org.apache.geronimo.specs

I'm not sure that would work for javamail. Javamail has a strange discovery system where implementation of protocols, such as smtp, are loaded directly from the application class loader. I believe that if you hide the geronimo protocol implementations, javamail won't work. -dain On Oct 1

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3540) Session.loadProviders(ProviderInfo info, InputStream is) doesn't seem to handle comments correctly

rowse/GERONIMO-3540 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: mail Affects Versions: 2.0.2, 2.0.1, 2.0 Reporter: Dain Sundstrom Assignee: Rick McGuire After reviewing the Session code, it do

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3539) Can not override providers using META-INF/javamail.providers file

: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: mail Affects Versions: 2.0.2, 2.0.1, 2.0 Reporter: Dain Sundstrom Assignee: Rick McGuire The Session.loadProviders(ClassLoader cl) loads provider files from: META-INF/javamail.default.providers

Re: Effectiveness of WADI's Design and Implementation Comforted

I agree about the annotation thing. Would it be difficult change the design to have some reasonable defaults, and only use annotations (or xml) for overrides? -dain On Oct 18, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: Gianni, What you have done is very cool. I guess my only comment is that

Re: Effectiveness of WADI's Design and Implementation Comforted

I'd also like to see a sticky test as most of the clusters I have worked with use a high-end hardware load balancer (although I do find this test very interesting). I'd also like to see the test use a larger and mutating session. One of the things that will effect latency is the time (and

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 3.2

+1 -dain On Oct 1, 2007, at 8:10 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Please vote on releasing xbean 3.2. Binaries / maven repo is available at: http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-3.2/ Svn source tag is available at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.2/ It includes D

Re: KEYS ?

, at 12:35 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: What external references are you referring to? I believe that it does have symlink support, though I hardly ever use it. --jason On Jul 27, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: I think there are external references to this file, but I'm not sur

Re: What to do with legacy EJB 2.1 code in DayTrader?

I'd like to see the 2.1 code kept around so we can compare base EJB performance against other servers. There is going to be legacy code for a long time and this tool is our only way to see how legacy code performs on our server. -dain On Jul 25, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:

Re: KEYS ?

I think there are external references to this file, but I'm not sure how we should deal with them. Does svn have symlink support? -dain On Jul 26, 2007, at 3:52 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Should keys move up to a peer to the STATUS file too? Seems these are project global, not specific to th

Re: Transaction and Connector jars untied from g. kernel

Sweet! Thanks, -dain On Jul 24, 2007, at 6:00 PM, David Jencks wrote: see GERONIMO-3344. Following years of urging from activemq/jencks/servicemix and more recent urging from openejb I finally split off the tx and connector modules into bits that implement the functionality w/o geronimo

Re: OpenEJB for trunk

Geronimo should exclude these dependencies when declaring a dependency on OpenEJB jars. -dain On Jul 24, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: We need OpenEJB that uses 2.1-SNAPSHOT version Of Geronimo. I am seeing this in offline build: Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.geron

Re: Can Swizzle-Stream be removed?

To summarize from the discussion on the OpenEJB list, the answer is no. This jar is and the classes listed below are most definitely used. Even more importantly to Geronimo, they are a critical part of the OpenEJB/Geronimo integration. -dain On Jul 21, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Ted Kirby wrote:

Re: Should we cancel 1.2?

1.2.1 release... -Donald Jason Dillon wrote: What were the bugs that were to be "quickly fixed"? I forget its been so long. Why not just push it out asis? --jason On Jul 16, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: 1.2 has been sitting in a branch for well over 6 months now. Ori

Re: Should we cancel 1.2?

at 9:53 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: 1.2 has been sitting in a branch for well over 6 months now. Originally, it was going to be delayed so some bugs could be "quickly fixed", but it doesn't look like that is ever going to happen. I'm not really interested in being the mana

Should we cancel 1.2?

1.2 has been sitting in a branch for well over 6 months now. Originally, it was going to be delayed so some bugs could be "quickly fixed", but it doesn't look like that is ever going to happen. I'm not really interested in being the manager for this release anymore, but if there is good i

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3267) Naming lookup fails. Reported error for a different name than requested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dain Sundstrom reassigned GERONIMO-3267: Assignee: Matt Hogstrom (was: Dain Sundstrom) I believe David Jencks committed

Re: svn commit: r551608 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: assemblies/geronimo-boilerplate-minimal/src/main/resources/bin/ maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/mavenplugins/

On Jun 28, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:54 PM, David Jencks wrote: This looks to me like a dreadful approach. Did you try including the property in defaultPersistenceUnitProperties in the persistence builder config No. I didn't find the existing properties

Re: Transaction manager now tied to ejb?

the problem... just need a little more testing before I commit... thanks david jencks On Jun 28, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: It appears that the geronimo transaction manager is now tied directly to ejb :( The TransactionManagerImpl class has the following code: public void

Transaction manager now tied to ejb?

It appears that the geronimo transaction manager is now tied directly to ejb :( The TransactionManagerImpl class has the following code: public void setEntityManager(String persistenceUnit, Object entityManager) { Object oldEntityManager = entityManagers.put (persistenceUnit, en

Re: Problem in org.apache.geronimo.system.jmx.RealMBeanServerReference

This constructor is for the case when you know the agent id. There used to be a case where we created an MBeanServer and then referenced it later. In that case, we knew the agent id, so to guarantee that we got the same mbean server, I wrote this code. I'm not sure it is used anymore. In

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Tim McConnell as our newest committer

Congratulations! You have definitely earned it. -dain On Jun 21, 2007, at 3:36 PM, David Blevins wrote: All, The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Tim McConnell has recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo committer. Tim has done some great work in 2.0 with re

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)

+1 -dain On Jun 11, 2007, at 7:59 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly. Something odd with M

Re: [VOTE] Release of javamail 1.4 specs and javamail 1.4 providers

+1 -dain On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:03 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: Please review the javamail specifications located at http:// people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/ The files in question are geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.0.tar.gz

Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, JSP, WS-Metadata

On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:32 AM, David Jencks wrote: el: + 0.1 missing scm section in pom.xml j2ee-management: +0.1 missing scm section in pom.xml. Is the spec still called "j2ee management"? jsp-2.1: -1 unless the comments in the following files are not from sun or there is a written licensi

Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, JSP, WS-Metadata

+1 -dain On Jun 8, 2007, at 8:06 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th a

Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX

+1 -dain On Jun 8, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http:// people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June

Re: Releasing the current SPECs

Please double check that all dependencies of the specs are marked as provided before spinning the release. -dain On Jun 7, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I am putting together a list of specs that need to be released. I am planning on taking the current SNAPSHOTs in Geronimo and pu

Re: GBeanInfoBuilder [was Re: svn commit: r499201 - in /geronimo/server/trunk/modules/geronimo-kernel/src: main/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/ main/java/org/apache/geronimo/gbean/runtime/ test/java/o

582.html The above output is for rev 502653 without my patch. The getValue() method is a valid getter. Thanks Anita --- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All methods regardless of if they are valid getters or setters should be exposed via the invoke method (using an o

Re: RELEASE NOTES 2.0-M6

IIRC it is caused by people marking a new issues as "affects" 2.0-M6 which is logically incorrect because an issue fixed in 2.0-M6 could not affect that release (since it is fixed). People commonly make this mistake because the believe that 2.0-M6-SNAPSHOT is the same thing as 2.0-M6 so th

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2950) Build test failure in geronimo-naming

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dain Sundstrom updated GERONIMO-2950: - Component/s: naming Priority: Minor (was: Major) Affects

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2950) Build test failure in geronimo-naming

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dain Sundstrom updated GERONIMO-2950: - Attachment: GERONIMO-2950.patch Problem is fixed in xbean-naming 3.1-SNAPSHOT, but I

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2768) geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec is still using geronimo-ejb_2.1_spec instead of new ejb_3.0_spec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dain Sundstrom closed GERONIMO-2768. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M5) 2.0-M6

Re: tarball issues

It is a bug that Maven inherited from Ant 1.6 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28776 I'm not sure there is much we can do other then re-tar/checksum/sign the archives, and that will take convincing the release manager it is worth the extra effort. -dain On May 27, 2007,

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 3.0.1

+1 -dain On May 25, 2007, at 12:56 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I have tagged an XBean 3.0.1 version at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.0.1/ Compared to 3.0, the only change is a fix in the main pom where the version property has been left to 3.0-SNAPSHOT, thus caus

Re: replacing geronimo's servlet, jsp, and el specs

On May 23, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: IIRC the Tomcat has some non-compliant spec jars. Specifically, the annotations-api.jar is not correct... it has javax/persistence/ PersistenceContext$PersistenceContextType.class, but that class is not an inner class and

Re: replacing geronimo's servlet, jsp, and el specs

IIRC the Tomcat has some non-compliant spec jars. Specifically, the annotations-api.jar is not correct... it has javax/persistence/ PersistenceContext$PersistenceContextType.class, but that class is not an inner class and should be javax.persistence.PersistenceContextType I'm guessing the

Re: [BUILD] TRUNK: Failed for Revision: 535062

OpenEJB uses an automated system to publish snapshots, so if you need up to the minute code, you will have to build it yourself. -dain On May 3, 2007, at 9:19 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I'm in favor of using the snapshots. If something has changed in openejb which would affect G, then new sna

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3137) Servlets must rollback uncommitted transaction when the service method exits

On May 4, 2007, at 3:00 AM, Daniel Alheiros wrote: Do you think it could be interesting logging this in a WARN level to make the application developer to fix it? I believe it will only happen caused by bad code, so... The rule appears to be: if servlet started a UT and it is marked rollba

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3137) Servlets must rollback uncommitted transaction when the service method exits

Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: web Reporter: Dain Sundstrom Assigned To: David Jencks Servlets must rollback uncommitted transaction when the service method exits. The servlet should check for a tx on entry and if

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3125) AdminObjectRefBuilder does not handle UserTransaction resource-env-refs

Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: deployment Reporter: Dain Sundstrom Assigned To: David Jencks In Jee 5 is is legal to have @Resource and , to add a UserTransaction (or EJB Context) to the ENC. This AdminObjectRefBuilder does

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M5 rc1 binaries available for review and vote.

+1 Ship it! -dain On Apr 25, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: The 2.0-M5 binaries are available at http://people.apache.org/ ~hogstrom/2.0-M5-rc1 The binaries addressed a problem seen in 2.0-M4 which was subsequently scrubbed where 2.0-Mn and 2.0-Mn-SNAPSHOT binaries were include

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0-M5 (rc1) binaries available

I think doing a monthly or simi-monthy unstable would be excellent, and would save a lot of work. As for naming, I don't really care. We are releasing milestones right now, and they don't really represent "defined" goals anyway. -dain On Apr 26, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Donald Woods wrote: I

Re: Geronimo/Tuscany integration

I suggest you get option 1 working before attempting option 2. I suspect you will find lots of bugs and mismatched assumptions. Once that is working, option 2 will be much easier to implement since you know it "Should Work". -dain On Apr 25, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote: Hello

Is the connector problem fixed?

Matt, I see you are wrapping the G-M5 release. Does that mean you fixed the connector problem and I should look at respinning the 1.2 release. -dain

Re: Help needed with geronimo.sh

+1 I think the platform scripts should be as thin as possible -dain On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Well, that sounds better than putting that muck into platform scripts. Though, why not simplify this even more and force users to make the correct directories with the righ

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 3.0

+1 -dain On Apr 17, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I have uploaded an XBean 3.0 release at http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-3.0/repo/org/apache/xbean/ This repo also contains older releases so that the meta-data is correct. [ ] +1 Release XBean 3.0 [ ] 0 No opinion [ ] -

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 -dain On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote wi

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 -dain On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:23 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 -dain On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:23 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo- jta_1.1_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This vote wi

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1 jar (1st vote)

+1 -dain On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws- metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in: http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1 [ ] +1 Release these binaries [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not release these binaries This

Re: [discuss] Release Geronimo 1.2

Can you create JIRAs for these? On Apr 9, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: Aside from the ongoing technical discussion, I have the following comments on the proposed 1.2 binaries and source: 1) I don't see release notes in the assemblies. Which means no instructions on what to wit

Re: [vote] Release Geronimo 1.2

s the same code for 2.0. On Apr 4, 2007, at 8:01 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: The 1.2 release cut and awaiting your vote! All the files are available in a staging area in my home dir on people. http://people.apache.org/~dain/dist geronimo-1.2-src geronimo-framework-1.2 geronimo-jetty-m

Re: Outstanding SNAPSHOTs in Geronimo (informational)

I'm about to move OpenJPA to 0.9.7-SNAPSHOT which contains some critical fixes for Derby and some query styles. The OpenJPA project is currently working on wrapping this release, so hopefully this SNAPSHOT will only be around for a few weeks. -dain On Apr 5, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Matt Hogstro

Re: [vote] Release Geronimo 1.2

at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.notifyShutdownHooks (BasicKernel.java:668) at org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.shutdown (BasicKernel.java:645) at org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon$1.run(Daemon.java:225) Server shutdown completed Cheers! Hernan

Re: [vote] Release openejb-2.3-incubating

nto svn, just like G does (ie. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/1.2/ repository/ ). --jason On Apr 4, 2007, at 4:52 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: All, The release is cut and awaiting your vote! All the files are available in a staging area in my home dir on people.

Re: svn commit: r525641 - in /geronimo/server/tags: 1.2.0/ 1.2/

On Apr 4, 2007, at 4:52 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Hey, just curious... did you use the release plugin to make this stuff, or did you have to roll it by hand? I had to do it by hand. Last time I talked to Jason Van Zyl about this, he said it won't work with Geronimo due to our use of proper

[vote] Release Geronimo 1.2

The 1.2 release cut and awaiting your vote! All the files are available in a staging area in my home dir on people. http://people.apache.org/~dain/dist geronimo-1.2-src geronimo-framework-1.2 geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.2 geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.2 geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.2 geron

Re: Creating OpenEJB 2.3 and Geronimo 1.2 binaries

On Apr 3, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: I'm going to attempt to create binaries for OpenEJB 2.3 and Geronimo 1.2 tonight. Since OpenEJB 2.3 and Geronimo 1.2 are highly coupled we need to release them together. With luck, we'll have some files to test and start

Re: svn commit: r524934 - /geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS

On Apr 2, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: On Apr 2, 2007, at 2:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +Status: The release is stalled waiting for final releases from dependent + projects. Specifically, we need releases from: +Showstoppers: + Yoko 1.0 - Contains many fixes t

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2972) Bind JavaMail Session to Global JNDI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dain Sundstrom closed GERONIMO-2972. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0-M4 Assignee: Christopher M. Cardona

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-2972) Bind JavaMail Session to Global JNDI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dain Sundstrom reassigned GERONIMO-2972: Assignee: Dain Sundstrom (was: Christopher M. Cardona) > Bind JavaMail Sess

Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M4 Binaries available (rc1)

+1 -dain On Apr 1, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I have placed the 2.0-M4 binaries out on http://people.apache.org/ ~hogstrom/2.0-M4-rc1 for you to take a look at. (They are uploading as I write this). I have done some testing with DayTrader. There is an issue in connecting wi

Re: G 1.2 && xmlbeans-maven-plugin 2.0.1-20060627.031204-7

If it works with the latest release we can switch to that; otherwise IMO a pinned snapshot is fine. It is just a maven plugin after all. -dain On Mar 30, 2007, at 3:46 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone know whats up with the xmlbeans-maven-plugin wrt server/ branches/1.2? Its currently using

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3046) When starting Daytrader after deploy on 2.0-SNAPSHOT ejb-jar is started before its dependencies have been started

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dain Sundstrom reassigned GERONIMO-3046: Assignee: Matt Hogstrom (was: Dain Sundstrom) I believe this is fixed with

Re: Tomcat m2 repo?

On Mar 27, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: On Mar 27, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Yesterday they marked the issue as resolved since the tomcat jars are now available at http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2- repository, but Ug... why on earth is Tomcat not just usi

Re: org.apache.j2g

I'm guessing one day there may be more then just a JBoss converter, so you may want to go with something like org.apache.geronimo.convert.jboss. I'm not sure "convert" is best word... maybe migrate. -dain On Mar 26, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I asked about this before, but go

Re: Where is the src for org.apache.geronimo.gjndi.GlobalContextGBean

You should ask on the xbean mailing list. -dain On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:34 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Looks like xbean-naming is still compiling for 1.4. Is there any specific reason for this? Can we switch all of xbean to compile for 1.5... and if you need 1.4 compat, then use the retrotransl

Re: What is this doing here modules/geronimo-openejb-builder/geronimo-openejb.xml

It is used when testing the openejb itests in G. This testing is done by hand and there isn't any where really better for it. -dain On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone know? --jason

Re: Weeding out backport-util-concurrent

On Mar 19, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Now that server/trunk requires 1.5 to build and run, I think we should start to weed out our usage of the backport-util-concurrent package (and concurrent if there is still anything left of that in our src tree). I think we may still have t

CMP 1.x functionally complete

For those of you that aren't subscribed to the OpenEJB dev list... I just committed support for CMP 1.x complex and unknown primary keys which were the two small remaining features for 1.x. Tomorrow, I'm going to start on the remaining 2.x features which are complex and unknown primary keys

Re: SAAJ integration idea

On Mar 14, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > Another idea I've had was to create a new context classloader (when > set() is called) instead of the thread local solution. That new > context classloader would first load a specific jar file for the SAAJ > implementation (the jar file would

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2969) Transaction recovery broken for MDBs

) Components: connector, OpenEJB Reporter: Dain Sundstrom Transaction recovery for MDBs is not currently working because the OpenEJB MdbContainer does not register the XAResources from an ActivationSpec with the Geronimo transaction manager. This means that Geronimo has no resource

Re: MDBs working in 2.0

On Mar 14, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Mar 14, 2007, at 3:53 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: I believe that I have MDBs working in 2.0 (and the tck). In general they should work about as well as Stateless beans do, but haven't received as much testing. That's great.

Re: SAAJ integration idea

On Mar 14, 2007, at 8:15 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: I'm working on the SAAJ integration in Geronimo. I have the following idea on how to integrate it and I would applicate any comments, suggestions, better solutions, etc. We have three different SAAJ implementations to work with: Axis1, Axis2, and

MDBs working in 2.0

I believe that I have MDBs working in 2.0 (and the tck). In general they should work about as well as Stateless beans do, but haven't received as much testing. I also believe I have broken transaction recovery for the time being. -dain

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_mail-1-1 and geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_provider-1.1

+1 dain On Mar 12, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: This is a vote for release of a new version of the geronimo- javamail_1.3.1_mail and geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_provider jars. These are companions to the recently released version of the javamail 1.3.1 spec jar. The provider jar cont

Re: svn commit: r517486 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: configs/openejb/src/plan/ modules/geronimo-connector-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment/ modules/geronimo-connector/src

Sorry... completely missed this message... On Mar 12, 2007, at 7:27 PM, David Jencks wrote: Is there some reason you didn't use the activationSpecInfo map which already had the info you put into messageListenerToActivationSpec map and a lot more besides? Well, I can't say I'm totally happy

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2959) PersistenceUnitRefBuilder does not create unique enough name queries

Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: naming Reporter: Dain Sundstrom Assigned To: David Jencks PersistenceUnitRefBuilder creates abstract name queries like ?name=cmp#org.apache.geronimo.persistence.PersistenceUnitGBean which is not

Re: Getting ready for G 1.2 release?

The openejb release is dependent on the yoko release. As soon as yoko is ready, we'll start the release. -dain On Mar 8, 2007, at 6:43 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I think we should start wrapping up the SNAPSHOT deps we have in 1.2 to prepare for a release. These are the ones I am aware of:

Re: Getting ready for G 1.2 release?

David, If you want to fix these, that is cool. Otherwise, they can get fixed in a point release. -dain On Mar 8, 2007, at 7:47 PM, David Jencks wrote: I think the yoko release is on the way if not out. Jiras && my opinion: GERONIMO-433 Tolerate non-Sun JREs has anyone tried this? wi

Re: Problem with svn head, TagLibConfiguration, xerces, and jdk 1.5 (in geronimo)

When we've had problems like this before, we passed the offending library with an unclosable stream. -dain On Mar 7, 2007, at 1:29 PM, David Jencks wrote: I'm trying to run svn head inside the geronimo integration and ran into a bizarre problem (yet again, see below) in which xerces is cl

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-javamail_2.4_spec-1.3

+1 -dain On Mar 5, 2007, at 5:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: All, the javamail 1.3 spec has been updated to fix a problem with Transport.send() that multiple 1.1.1 and 1.2 beta users have tripped over. We'd like to get this released in time for the Geronimo 1.2 final version so fewer people

Re: [BUILD] TRUNK: Failed for Revision: 514904

I had this same problem earlier today, but it went away with a rebuild. -dain On Mar 5, 2007, at 3:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Building with Maven version: 2.0.5 Revision: 514904 built with tests skipped See the full build-1800.log file at http://people.apache.org/ ~prasad/binaries/200703

Re: 2.0-M3 Download page update

On Mar 5, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I'm seeing the following message being issued for Tomcat and Jetty for the tar image: tar: A lone zero block at 158322 for Jetty, and tar: A lone zero block at 158480 for Tomcat. The servers work correctly AFAICT but this is odd. I'll see i

Re: Jars in the dist

On Mar 2, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: On Mar 2, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Team, #1) 2 versions of castor jar are present. Do we even need castor jar? castor-0.9.5.3.jar castor-1.0.5.jar I hope we can use the newer... never tried to see if that works or not though

Re: mx4j dependencies

On Mar 1, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: * modules/geronimo-jetty6/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/jetty6/ ClassLoaderTest.java (attempts to use "mx4j.MBeanDescription" to test classloading stuff) Not sure what to do about the later... or even if anything needs to be done. I'd

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >