I'll be the dissenting opinion :)
Personally, I don't like INFO as its too verbose and it is not
consistent across projects. If we moved it I would prefer WARN rather
than INFO but it largely depends on who we feel the largest user
population is.. I'm more concerned about people's
I agree that we should change it from ERROR to INFO.
I think any change in log4j is on the fly, i.e. you can change it any
time and you don't have to restart the server to pick up the change.
Lin
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I don't mind if INFO is the default log level. It would be nice if we
can
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the
Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-term
(e.g. Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul of our logging
code. I'd like to see more structure and consistency in our logging.
However, that's
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for
the Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-
term (e.g. Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul of our
logging code. I'd like to see more structure
Kevan Miller wrote:
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the
Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-term (e.g.
Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul of our logging code. I'd
like to see more structure and consistency in our logging.
I don't mind if INFO is the default log level. It would be nice if we
can also change it
1. during Geronimo startup.
2. during runtime.
Possible ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/11/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the
Geronimo
Are you refering to console output or what is captured in the log file?
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:27:20
To:Geronimo Dev dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Default server log level
The intent of this thread
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:43 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for
the Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-
term (e.g. Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul of
On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Are you refering to console output or what is captured in the log
file?
Heh. Come on, read my mind... :-P
I'm referring to the log FILE. I'm fine with our current CONSOLE
behavior...
--kevan
On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Are you refering to console output or what is captured in the log
file?
Heh. Come on, read my mind... :-P
Um, ya... :-P
I'm referring to the log FILE. I'm fine with our current CONSOLE
I agree, that changing the file logging level to INFO is more usable for the
majority of our users.
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the
Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-term (e.g.
Geronimo 2.0.x).
I very much favor and endorse changing the file logging level to INFO.
Ted Kirby
On 9/11/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, that changing the file logging level to INFO is more usable for the
majority of our users.
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
The intent of this thread is
12 matches
Mail list logo
