Another way to look at it, would be based on Eclipse releases.
For Eclipse 3.3, we should only support Geronimo 2.0.x and 1.1.1.
When Geronimo 2.1 is released, we will still be using Eclipse 3.3
(v3.3.2 is targeted for March 2008), so either 1) we drop support for
1.1.1 users at that time or 2)
I agree with Kevan that we need to be practical here. Would 2.0 GEP
supports 2.0 level and all 2.0.X levels of geronimo?
Lin
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 23, 2007, at 9:08 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi everyone, I have a couple questions I'd like to discuss about the
Geronimo Eclipse plugin:
(1) I think N-2 is a good rule to go by.
On 10/23/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone, I have a couple questions I'd like to discuss about the
Geronimo
Eclipse plugin:
1. How many versions of the Geronimo server should we continue to
simultaneously
support in the
On Oct 23, 2007, at 9:08 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi everyone, I have a couple questions I'd like to discuss about
the Geronimo Eclipse plugin:
1. How many versions of the Geronimo server should we continue to
simultaneously support in the Geronimo Eclipse plugin ??
2. What level of
On 10/25/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 2007, at 9:08 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi everyone, I have a couple questions I'd like to discuss about
the Geronimo Eclipse plugin:
1. How many versions of the Geronimo server should we continue to
simultaneously support
Hi everyone, I have a couple questions I'd like to discuss about the Geronimo
Eclipse plugin:
1. How many versions of the Geronimo server should we continue to simultaneously
support in the Geronimo Eclipse plugin ??
2. What level of support should we provide in the Eclipse plugin for the
