Donald, thanks for doing all these!
Are you thinking of releasing this separately from the Geronimo Eclipse
plugin? Might be good to release together when Eclipse plugin releases
its next maintenance release (if it comes out soon) and also allow users
to download j2g using Eclipse update
Erik, could you create a page in the wiki sandbox (http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSBOX/index.html) that we could later move into the main web site
Cheers!
Hernan
Donald Woods wrote:
J2G has now been moved out of sandbox and into -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk
Roger, will do.
On 9/21/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik, could you create a page in the wiki sandbox (
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSBOX/index.html) that we could later move into
the main web site
Cheers!
Hernan
Donald Woods wrote:
J2G has now been moved out of sandbox
I didn't want to tie the J2G releases to the WTP server adaptor releases for
now, but we could in the future if there is more synergy between them and
users start asking for it... For now, placing J2G in the same update site as
the WTP plugins should be enough for most users.
-Donald
Lin
J2G has now been moved out of sandbox and into -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/j2g/trunk
I've also created a J2G component in GERONIMODEVTOOLS for us to use and the
initial release target should be 1.0.0.
I'd like to quickly get the build updated to use the
I started looking at the J2G documentation on the wiki. Two immediate
questions come up and I hope someone can help answering them:
1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0 or 2.0.1?
2) Does this tool migrate Jave EE 5 deployment plans?
If someone can point me to the samples
Yep, I'll move it over. Just been busy with other things...
-Donald
Jason Warner wrote:
Donald,
It seems no one is opposed to this idea. We're you going to make this
change soon?
Thanks,
Jason Warner
On 9/13/07, *Matt Hogstrom * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lin,
On 9/19/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started looking at the J2G documentation on the wiki. Two immediate
questions come up and I hope someone can help answering them:
1) Does this tool support/been tested on Geronimo 2.0 or 2.0.1?
The tool supports and was tested against
snip
...however the migration applications at the time weren't flawless ...
/snip
C'mon, that's what make them even more interesting ;-)
Cheers!
Hernan
Erik B. Craig wrote:
Yes, they would, actually...
I have done some amount of testing using the sample migration apps,
although it was with
Erik,
Thanks for your answer. I thought it did support 2.0, but wanted to be
sure. I guess we just need to mention that in the wiki (at the end it
said the application should be able to be deployed in a running instance
of Geronimo 1.1.1 without issue).
I'll let u know if I have more
Haha, yes, 'interesting' is certainly one way to put it =P
The ones that are in the 2.0 wiki should be quite a bit better though, since
we've (Viet and myself) have been collaborating on getting them cleaned up
and making sure they work on jboss and geronimo alike, as well as having
accurate
On 9/19/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
speaking of which, and maybe is for a different thread. Have you been
using maven 2 for those apps?
If so, have you used any template?
Nope, I have left them as-is for compilation/packaging. All of the ones I
have personally touched have
Yes, they would, actually...
I have done some amount of testing using the sample migration apps, although
it was with the versions that are present in the Geronimo 1.1 wiki pages,
not the Geronimo 2.0 wiki pages.
J2G was successful on these 1.1 applications as well, however the migration
speaking of which, and maybe is for a different thread. Have you been using maven 2 for those apps?
If so, have you used any template?
The reason I'm asking is because with Prasad and Viet we've been trying to
figure out a way to consolidate all the sample applications as well as
providing
would any of these samples work for further testing?
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html
Cheers!
Hernan
Erik B. Craig wrote:
Lin,
On 9/19/07, *Lin Sun* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started looking at the J2G documentation on the
Donald,
It seems no one is opposed to this idea. We're you going to make this
change soon?
Thanks,
Jason Warner
On 9/13/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 to move it ... I agree with the other comments on lazy consensus.
On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Let's do both move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to
devtools/trunk/j2g and update the Development Tools section of the
Geronimo site at the earliest.
In http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07349.html a user
was still using some old wiki docs (
I think we could mention this tool and include some links to the main website
on top level pages like *Migrating to Apache Geronimo*, here are some links
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html
+1 to move it ... I agree with the other comments on lazy consensus.
On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to
move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g,
so we can start working towards an
Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to move the
current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g, so we can start
working towards an official release of the tool.
Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as the code
is already in
Yes!
I am all for this, especially so we can progress it onto the Development
Tools section of the Geronimo site to make it more noticeable and easily
accessible to people interested in migrating applications, as right now the
only way to download it or even be aware of it is by digging through
On 9/12/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as the code
is already in our svn repo?
I'd say it merely requires lazy consensus where you declare your
intent (already done) and after a couple of days (say 72 hours) commit
Sounds good. I'll give everyone a few days to discuss it and then call a
Vote. Thanks.
-Donald
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/12/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as the code
is already in our svn repo?
I'd say it
The tool seems to already be getting some attention from users in the
community. I think, moving it out of sandbox and into devtools might
increase the interest in it. That seems like a good thing to me.
-Jason Warner
On 9/12/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good. I'll give
On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to
move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g,
so we can start working towards an official release of the tool.
Does this require a Vote first or does
+1 - I agree this is a good thing to do. Let me know if you need any
help here.
Lin
Donald Woods wrote:
Sounds good. I'll give everyone a few days to discuss it and then call
a Vote. Thanks.
-Donald
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/12/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this
26 matches
Mail list logo
