My +1
-David
> On May 14, 2022, at 2:00 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the
> snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that
> being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial
Hi,
Same feedback as Romain, I don't think we need a M1.
regards,
François
On 14/05/2022 23:00, David Blevins wrote:
Hey All,
We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the
snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that
being a
+1
El dom, 15 may 2022 a las 6:24, Raymond Augé ()
escribió:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sun., May 15, 2022, 5:58 a.m. Jean-Louis MONTEIRO,
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Same feedback, I'd go for a final. There is no work remaining as far as I
>> can tell
>>
>> Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 09:03, Romain
+1 (binding)
On Sun., May 15, 2022, 5:58 a.m. Jean-Louis MONTEIRO,
wrote:
> +1
>
> Same feedback, I'd go for a final. There is no work remaining as far as I
> can tell
>
> Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 09:03, Romain Manni-Bucau a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> If we are confident to match javax/jakarta
+1
Same feedback, I'd go for a final. There is no work remaining as far as I
can tell
Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 09:03, Romain Manni-Bucau a
écrit :
> Hi
>
> If we are confident to match javax/jakarta namespace change why not doing
> a final? Errors/missing features could go in bugs.
> Issue with
Hi
If we are confident to match javax/jakarta namespace change why not doing a
final? Errors/missing features could go in bugs.
Issue with milestones is the tooling support and proposed updates vs
version policies so if we can avoid it I would be for it but not sure if I
missed sthg.
Le dim. 15
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 11:00 PM David Blevins wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the
> snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that
> being a milestone it should be fairly
Hi +1
Thanks :)
On Sat, May 14, 2022, 18:00 David Blevins wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the
> snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that
> being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to
Hey All,
We're thinking to do a release on the TomEE side and this is one of the
snapshot dependencies we have. I've prepped a 2.0.0-M1 with the idea that
being a milestone it should be fairly non-controversial to propose without a
heads up and I haven't checked the TCK status. I know we're
