Re: [YOKO][DISCUSS] Time to create a 1.0 release?
Gianny Damour wrote: Hello Rick, Sorry, this is not directly related to your question. What kind of integration with ObjectGrid have you been working on? FWIW, I am working on a hierarchical, transactional, distributed, partitioned and replicated cache and data-grid solution as part of WADI and I am quite interested by this topic these days. No real integration work, just helping the ObjectGrid developers with Yoko fixes when they attempt to run using the Yoko ORB. Rick Thanks, Gianny On 02/05/2008, at 11:43 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: I've recently completed an activity on seeing if we could get the IBM ObjectGrid product working with the Yoko ORB. This is a BIG CORBA application that rooted out quite a number of fringe bugs in the Yoko ORB. The testing effort involved no just interactions between a yoko client and server, but also in different client/server combinations with the IBM ORB (ObjectGrid has some problems running on the Sun ORB at the moment, so that interoperability was not tested). In the process of debugging these problems, I also added quite a bit of additional logging to the core orb. Things are looking pretty good and stable at this point. Currently, Geronimo is shipping using a pinned snapshot of the yoko code rather than an official release. Harmony is picking up SNAPSHOT builds, I believe. I think it is time to consider publishing the 1.0 release so there's finally an official release level to work from. I currently don't have any work items I feel need to be done before a 1.0 release can get created. I have a number of items I think need to get improved what I'd prefer doing after we cut a 1.0 release. Does anybody else know of additional items that might be required for the 1.0 release? Rick
Re: [YOKO][DISCUSS] Time to create a 1.0 release?
Rick McGuire wrote: I've recently completed an activity on seeing if we could get the IBM ObjectGrid product working with the Yoko ORB. This is a BIG CORBA application that rooted out quite a number of fringe bugs in the Yoko ORB. The testing effort involved no just interactions between a yoko client and server, but also in different client/server combinations with the IBM ORB (ObjectGrid has some problems running on the Sun ORB at the moment, so that interoperability was not tested). In the process of debugging these problems, I also added quite a bit of additional logging to the core orb. Things are looking pretty good and stable at this point. Currently, Geronimo is shipping using a pinned snapshot of the yoko code rather than an official release. Harmony is picking up SNAPSHOT builds, I believe. I think it is time to consider publishing the 1.0 release so there's finally an official release level to work from. I currently don't have any work items I feel need to be done before a 1.0 release can get created. I have a number of items I think need to get improved what I'd prefer doing after we cut a 1.0 release. Does anybody else know of additional items that might be required for the 1.0 release? Rick +1 for an official release. We need to eliminate our private builds and pinned versions in G. Joe
Re: [YOKO][DISCUSS] Time to create a 1.0 release?
I think it is time to consider publishing the 1.0 release so there's finally an official release level to work from. I currently don't have any work items I feel need to be done before a 1.0 release can get created. I have a number of items I think need to get improved what I'd prefer doing after we cut a 1.0 release. Does anybody else know of additional items that might be required for the 1.0 release? I'd be happy with a release, nothing that requires immediate attention. Lars
[YOKO][DISCUSS] Time to create a 1.0 release?
I've recently completed an activity on seeing if we could get the IBM ObjectGrid product working with the Yoko ORB. This is a BIG CORBA application that rooted out quite a number of fringe bugs in the Yoko ORB. The testing effort involved no just interactions between a yoko client and server, but also in different client/server combinations with the IBM ORB (ObjectGrid has some problems running on the Sun ORB at the moment, so that interoperability was not tested). In the process of debugging these problems, I also added quite a bit of additional logging to the core orb. Things are looking pretty good and stable at this point. Currently, Geronimo is shipping using a pinned snapshot of the yoko code rather than an official release. Harmony is picking up SNAPSHOT builds, I believe. I think it is time to consider publishing the 1.0 release so there's finally an official release level to work from. I currently don't have any work items I feel need to be done before a 1.0 release can get created. I have a number of items I think need to get improved what I'd prefer doing after we cut a 1.0 release. Does anybody else know of additional items that might be required for the 1.0 release? Rick
Re: [YOKO][DISCUSS] Time to create a 1.0 release?
On May 2, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: I've recently completed an activity on seeing if we could get the IBM ObjectGrid product working with the Yoko ORB. This is a BIG CORBA application that rooted out quite a number of fringe bugs in the Yoko ORB. The testing effort involved no just interactions between a yoko client and server, but also in different client/ server combinations with the IBM ORB (ObjectGrid has some problems running on the Sun ORB at the moment, so that interoperability was not tested). In the process of debugging these problems, I also added quite a bit of additional logging to the core orb. Things are looking pretty good and stable at this point. Currently, Geronimo is shipping using a pinned snapshot of the yoko code rather than an official release. Harmony is picking up SNAPSHOT builds, I believe. I think it is time to consider publishing the 1.0 release so there's finally an official release level to work from. I currently don't have any work items I feel need to be done before a 1.0 release can get created. I have a number of items I think need to get improved what I'd prefer doing after we cut a 1.0 release. Does anybody else know of additional items that might be required for the 1.0 release? I'd love to see a 1.0 release. --kevan
Re: [YOKO][DISCUSS] Time to create a 1.0 release?
Hello Rick, Sorry, this is not directly related to your question. What kind of integration with ObjectGrid have you been working on? FWIW, I am working on a hierarchical, transactional, distributed, partitioned and replicated cache and data-grid solution as part of WADI and I am quite interested by this topic these days. Thanks, Gianny On 02/05/2008, at 11:43 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: I've recently completed an activity on seeing if we could get the IBM ObjectGrid product working with the Yoko ORB. This is a BIG CORBA application that rooted out quite a number of fringe bugs in the Yoko ORB. The testing effort involved no just interactions between a yoko client and server, but also in different client/ server combinations with the IBM ORB (ObjectGrid has some problems running on the Sun ORB at the moment, so that interoperability was not tested). In the process of debugging these problems, I also added quite a bit of additional logging to the core orb. Things are looking pretty good and stable at this point. Currently, Geronimo is shipping using a pinned snapshot of the yoko code rather than an official release. Harmony is picking up SNAPSHOT builds, I believe. I think it is time to consider publishing the 1.0 release so there's finally an official release level to work from. I currently don't have any work items I feel need to be done before a 1.0 release can get created. I have a number of items I think need to get improved what I'd prefer doing after we cut a 1.0 release. Does anybody else know of additional items that might be required for the 1.0 release? Rick
