Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-13 Thread Aaron Mulder
The note I saw on our Jira said that commons-fileupload 1.1 requires commons-io 1.1 -- do you have a separate indication that commons-io 1.2 is needed? http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1756 http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/fileupload/changes-report.html Thanks, Aaron On

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-11 Thread Gianny Damour
Kevan Miller wrote: On May 9, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Consolidated list so far is: Axis from 1.4-356167 to 1.4 commons-fileupload1.1-devto1.1 jasper from 5.5.9 to 5.5.15 Jetty from 5.1.9

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-11 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Gianny, TranQL 1.3 has several performance and feature fixes (thanks to you) that we've been planning on for 1.1. I didn't realize the changes to OpenEJB however. I'd like to get this release wrapped up the week after Java One if possible (end of the month). Can you guesstimate the

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-11 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Let's address Directory in 1.2. Since its not core to CTS I think it would be pushing 1.1 out. It would be awesome to get this updated in 1.2 when we finally ship 1.1. Looking at the packages out there we are ut of date on several so one of the first things I'd like to do is get current on

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-11 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Since the M2 conversion is independent of 1.1 what does the community think about starting that merge into 1.1 now? I think it would allow us to become more productive on 1.2 since the work would already be in place. For those working on the M2 conversion what do you think about starting that

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-11 Thread anita kulshreshtha
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since the M2 conversion is independent of 1.1 what does the community think about starting that merge into 1.1 now? I think it would allow us to become more productive on 1.2 since the work would already be in place. For those working on the

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-11 Thread Prasad Kashyap
Hi Matt, Moving the M2 conversion work from the trunk to 1.1 should not be disruptive. It would have the following changes 1) add pom.xmls in all modules 2) add a few ant files in some modules 3) change *Test.java files in quite a few modules. I have no strong objections to it except that I'm

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-11 Thread Guillaume Nodet
What are the ant files used for ? And why changing the test class names ? Surefire can be configured specifically if needed ... So this change could be delayed. Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Prasad Kashyap wrote: Hi Matt, Moving the M2 conversion work from the trunk to 1.1 should not be

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-11 Thread Prasad Kashyap
Ant files are used to do some custom things that jelly did in Maven 1. Eg: modules\installer-support\setup.xml The Test class names didn't change. Minor modifications to the code in the *Test.java were done. Sorry for the confusion. Cheers Prasad On 5/11/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-11 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Someone hit me in the head about priorities (I think it was Prasad). If someone isn't working on 1.1 and has time this is excellent. Please don't let me distract you from 1.1 though :) Prasad Kashyap wrote: Hi Matt, Moving the M2 conversion work from the trunk to 1.1 should not be

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-11 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 5/10/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All work related to M2 was halted until the trunk was merged. M2 packaging plugin would require transferring all M2 work to 1.1. I do not think there are any plans to do it before the merge or at least the 1.1. release. I think using

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-10 Thread Alexei Zakharov
ApacheDS0.9.2 to 1.0-RC2 ? I have a patch to port the Geronimo part to 1.0-RC2. However, currently ADS 1.0 jars propagated to maven2 repo only. 2006/5/9, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Consolidated list so far is: Axis from 1.4-356167 to 1.4 commons-fileupload

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-10 Thread Aaron Mulder
I'd rather handle the ApacheDS integration separately from the 1.1 release. Fortunately, the plugins work with the Maven 2 repository, so that issue should be easier. The main question is how to do the build and packaging. If the API is unchanged, we can build our integration module using our

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-10 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I haven't seen any geronimo plugin for m2 in head. That whould be very usefull, especially because Geronimo plugins have to be in a m2 layout, but the only tools to create a car is a m1 plugin. Any idea ? Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Aaron Mulder wrote: I'd rather handle the ApacheDS integration

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-10 Thread Alexei Zakharov
FYI: ADS API has changed significantly since 0.9.2. 2006/5/10, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd rather handle the ApacheDS integration separately from the 1.1 release. Fortunately, the plugins work with the Maven 2 repository, so that issue should be easier. The main question is how to do

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-10 Thread anita kulshreshtha
All work related to M2 was halted until the trunk was merged. M2 packaging plugin would require transferring all M2 work to 1.1. I do not think there are any plans to do it before the merge or at least the 1.1. release. I think using Maven1 will be best at this time. Let's hear from Jacek..

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-10 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Plugins are quite independant of the build afaik (even if they are used by the main build). They could be written for G 1.1 and updated for G 1.x and have their lifecycle decorrelated from Geronimo. As they will be very useful for people creating plugins, I think it could be interesting to

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-10 Thread Aaron Mulder
So my understanding of things is that we have the full set of G 1.1 plugins for Maven 1, and it would be nice to also have at least a G 1.1 packaging plugin for Maven 2 (though we'll need them all in due course). For the Maven 1 plugin, it looks like we have some Jelly code and a Java

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-10 Thread anita kulshreshtha
Comments inline... --- Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So my understanding of things is that we have the full set of G 1.1 plugins for Maven 1, and it would be nice to also have at least a G 1.1 packaging plugin for Maven 2 (though we'll need them all in due course). For the Maven 1

1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Here are the packages I'm recommending for 1.1. If I missed one please chime in. Axis from 1.4-356167 to 1.4 jasper from 5.5.9 to 5.5.15 Jetty from 5.1.9 to 5.1.10 stax from 1.1.1-dev to

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-09 Thread Jeff Genender
Chime! TC - 5.5.15 Matt Hogstrom wrote: Here are the packages I'm recommending for 1.1. If I missed one please chime in. Axis from 1.4-356167to 1.4 jasper from 5.5.9to5.5.15 Jetty from5.1.9to5.1.10 stax from1.1.1-devto

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-09 Thread Aaron Mulder
That issue has a great list. We definitely need to try updating commons-fileupload (from 1.1-dev to 1.1). I think there may even be a separate Jira for that. But the old one occasionally hangs, so it's definitely worth trying the new one. Thanks, Aaron On 5/9/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Consolidated list so far is: Axis from 1.4-356167 to 1.4 commons-fileupload 1.1-dev to 1.1 jasper from 5.5.9 to 5.5.15 Jetty from 5.1.9 to 5.1.10 stax from 1.1.1-dev to 1.1.2

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-09 Thread Kevan Miller
On May 9, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Consolidated list so far is: Axis from 1.4-356167 to 1.4 commons-fileupload 1.1-dev to 1.1 jasper from 5.5.9 to 5.5.15 Jetty from 5.1.9 to 5.1.10

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Hogstrom
You are correct Kevan. Thanks Kevan Miller wrote: On May 9, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Consolidated list so far is: Axis from 1.4-356167 to 1.4 commons-fileupload1.1-devto1.1 jasper from 5.5.9 to 5.5.15 Jetty

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-09 Thread David Jencks
I've built locally using HOWL 1.0.1 and it seems to work fine with no geronimo changes. I think the main problem will be getting it onto a suitable maven repo: I haven't found it to be released anywhere. Is pushing it into a m2 repo sufficient, are jars auto-backported into m1?

Re: 1.1 Package Upgrade List

2006-05-09 Thread Donald Woods
Moving to Commons-Fileupload 1.1 also requires upgrading to commons-io 1.2. Also, why are we upgrading to STAX 1.1.1, when all we need is just the STAX API? -Donald David Jencks wrote: I've built locally using HOWL 1.0.1 and it seems to work fine with no geronimo changes. I think the