On Aug 10, 2006, at 3:00 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:14 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
1.1.1 is in a form that we can get ready to release it. I was
talking with Aaron and he mentioned that there were some security
issues he was concerned about. I wou
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:14 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
1.1.1 is in a form that we can get ready to release it. I was
talking with Aaron and he mentioned that there were some security
issues he was concerned about. I would like to use this thread to
identify any issues that s
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/8/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Inline...
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> Here are the issues that bother me most in 1.1.1. I believe they are
> all also issues in 1.1.
>
> DEPLOYMENT
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/8/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Inline...
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> Here are the issues that bother me most in 1.1.1. I believe
they are
> all also issues in 1.1.
>
> DEPLOYMENT
>
> http://issues
On 8/8/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't agree with the above statement. Was that posted somewhere ? We've
talked about turning
things around faster but I don't think that infers poor quality releases.
I was going to spin up an rc1 this afternoon and look for feedback. Th
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/8/06, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not familiar with the issue and I'm not arguing that we don't need
to fix it. But this problem indicates that it was present in 1.1 and
somehow it didn't make it to the top of the list for 1.1.1 earlier.
Does it need to ho
Kevan Miller wrote:
SECURITY
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2294
- For a security realm with multiple login modules, we do not handle
the JAAS Control Flags correctly (e.g. we do not call the login
modules using the correct logic). Code to reproduce available. Alan
had claimed a
On 8/8/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here are the issues that bother me most in 1.1.1. I believe they areall also issues in 1.1.DEPLOYMENThttp://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2270
- Redeploy broken when module ID does not include a type (patch available)http://issues.apache
On 8/8/06, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not familiar with the issue and I'm not arguing that we don't need
to fix it. But this problem indicates that it was present in 1.1 and
somehow it didn't make it to the top of the list for 1.1.1 earlier.
Does it need to hold up the release or co
I'm not familiar with the issue and I'm not arguing that we don't need
to fix it. But this problem indicates that it was present in 1.1 and
somehow it didn't make it to the top of the list for 1.1.1 earlier.
Does it need to hold up the release or could it be delivered in 1.1.2?
Joe
Kevan Mi
On 8/8/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Inline...
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> Here are the issues that bother me most in 1.1.1. I believe they are
> all also issues in 1.1.
>
> DEPLOYMENT
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2270
> - Redeploy brok
Are these issues "newly" broken in 1.1.1 or are they issues that also
exist with 1.1? From looking at the JIRAs all list 1.1 or earlier as
being affected with the exception of GERONIMO-2270.
I don't see a reason to hold up 1.1.1 unless we have introduced some new
blocking issues in the 1.1.1
Inline...
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Here are the issues that bother me most in 1.1.1. I believe they are
all also issues in 1.1.
DEPLOYMENT
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2270
- Redeploy broken when module ID does not include a type (patch
available)
Here are the issues that bother me most in 1.1.1. I believe they are
all also issues in 1.1.
DEPLOYMENT
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2270
- Redeploy broken when module ID does not include a type (patch available)
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269
- Redeploy br
On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:14 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
1.1.1 is in a form that we can get ready to release it. I was
talking with Aaron and he mentioned that there were some security
issues he was concerned about. I would like to use this thread to
identify any issues that should be considere
1.1.1 is in a form that we can get ready to release it. I was talking with Aaron and he mentioned
that there were some security issues he was concerned about. I would like to use this thread to
identify any issues that should be considered show stoppers and make the decision on how to move
for
16 matches
Mail list logo
