On Dec 11, 2008, at 8:58 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Section 5.4.1 in SCA JEE Integration spec v1.0, the table at line
484 lists HttpSessionBindingListener. Do you think we should get
rid of that entry?
Yes. IMO the only things that can plausibly have container mediated
dependency
As part of SCA JavaEE Integration, I am looking at dependency injection into
HttpSessionBindingListener's in web apps. HttpSessionBindingListener is
different from other listeners in that HttpSessionBindingListener need not
be specified in web.xml. HttpSessionBindingListener gets activated
Why do you think that HttpSessionBindingListeners should support
dependecy injection? They aren't managed objects AFAICT and as you
state. Is there something I've overlooked in the spec?
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 11, 2008, at 7:12 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
As part of SCA JavaEE
Section 5.4.1 in SCA JEE Integration spec v1.0, the table at line 484 lists
HttpSessionBindingListener. Do you think we should get rid of that entry?
++Vamsi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:15 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
Why do you think that HttpSessionBindingListeners should
