I also expected it to do the same. Is there a test for this?
Thanks
Anita
--- David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 2007, at 8:44 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Right now I am stuck at this:
@RolesAllowed({a, b})
public class . {
@RolesAllowed(b) {
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 20, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
I am leaning towards deploying MEJB as an EJBModule. To auto
deploy
this I will be adding an mejb config. Are there any objections?
no :-)
I've been wondering if we should try to
On Sep 24, 2007, at 3:03 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 20, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
I am leaning towards deploying MEJB as an EJBModule. To auto
deploy
this I will be adding an mejb config. Are there any objections?
no :-)
I've been wondering if we should try to
On Sep 25, 2007, at 8:44 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Right now I am stuck at this:
@RolesAllowed({a, b})
public class . {
@RolesAllowed(b) {
public .. dosomething() {
}
}
Does this prevent 'a' from accessing dosomething()?
Yes. See
On Sep 20, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
I am leaning towards deploying MEJB as an EJBModule. To auto deploy
this I will be adding an mejb config. Are there any objections?
no :-)
I've been wondering if we should try to separate mejb security from
other security somehow
I am leaning towards deploying MEJB as an EJBModule. To auto deploy
this I will be adding an mejb config. Are there any objections?
Thanks
Anita
--- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a reason for not deploying MEJB as an application and
hard
coding it in g-openejb?
Is there a reason for not deploying MEJB as an application and hard
coding it in g-openejb?
Thanks
Anita
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo!
Thanks David...I'll give it a shot.
John
David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 17, 2005, at 2:38 PM, John Childs wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering about the MEJB class which is in the
j2ee module. Specifically, do you have any
suggestions on how I could expose this to play around
with it a bit? It looks like
