[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+reference name=serverInfogeronimo.system:role=ServerInfo/reference
attribute name=Url
type=java.lang.Stringtcp://localhost:61616/attribute
reference
name=ActiveMQContainergeronimo.server:type=JMSServer,container=ActiveMQ/reference
That's just struck me
On Oct 5, 2004, at 3:04 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+reference
name=serverInfogeronimo.system:role=ServerInfo/reference
attribute name=Url
type=java.lang.Stringtcp://localhost:61616/attribute
reference
name=ActiveMQContainergeronimo.server:
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The current convention is for attributes to follow Java variable
naming
conventions (i.e., lower case first character camel cased after) and
for references to follow Java class naming conventions (i.e., capital
On Oct 5, 2004, at 9:24 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The current convention is for attributes to follow Java variable
naming
conventions (i.e., lower case first character camel cased after) and
for references to follow Java
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
First you spend an hour trying to get a login to MoinMoin... then you
spend another hour trying to figure out how to make MoinMoin line up
the text on the page correctly.
That's okay, you would have just spent those two hours reading
