Re: svn commit: r568632 - /geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml

2007-08-23 Thread Joe Bohn
David Jencks wrote: I would like to see all the assemblies except the framework assembly be constructed by adding plugins to the framework assembly. Just because there has been no progress on this goal in the last year... I agree. That was the original vision and why the framework

How to assemble a server (was: Re: svn commit: r568632 - /geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml)

2007-08-23 Thread David Jencks
On Aug 23, 2007, at 6:13 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: David Jencks wrote: I would like to see all the assemblies except the framework assembly be constructed by adding plugins to the framework assembly. Just because there has been no progress on this goal in the last year... I agree. That

Re: svn commit: r568632 - /geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml

2007-08-22 Thread Joe Bohn
Hey Donald (and others) ... Is anybody actually using this framework ie. containerless assembly? I was just thinking of removing this assembly prior to seeing this change. At one point in time this was going to be our most minimal assembly (without even a web container) for building up a

Re: svn commit: r568632 - /geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml

2007-08-22 Thread Paul McMahan
Before removing it I'm wondering, in what scenario(s) would we use the framework assembly?One scenario that comes to mind is an installer that lays down the framework and then installs plugins on top of it for a truly customized server. The minimal assembly already seems to fit that

Re: svn commit: r568632 - /geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml

2007-08-22 Thread Kevan Miller
On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Hey Donald (and others) ... Is anybody actually using this framework ie. containerless assembly? I was just thinking of removing this assembly prior to seeing this change. Can't say that I'm using it, but I wouldn't be in a rush to delete

Re: svn commit: r568632 - /geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml

2007-08-22 Thread David Jencks
I would like to see all the assemblies except the framework assembly be constructed by adding plugins to the framework assembly. Just because there has been no progress on this goal in the last year... I think we are pretty close to having enough pieces lined up so we can actually do

Re: svn commit: r568632 - /geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml

2007-08-22 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
+1 Thanks Anita --- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to see all the assemblies except the framework assembly be constructed by adding plugins to the framework assembly. Just because there has been no progress on this goal in the last year... I think we are pretty

Re: svn commit: r568632 - /geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml

2007-08-22 Thread Paul McMahan
On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:52 AM, David Jencks wrote: I would like to see all the assemblies except the framework assembly be constructed by adding plugins to the framework assembly. Just because there has been no progress on this goal in the last year... I definitely agree with your vision

Re: svn commit: r568632 - /geronimo/server/trunk/assemblies/geronimo-framework/pom.xml

2007-08-22 Thread Donald Woods
I'm not using it. Was just fixing a Maven depends problem... -Donald Joe Bohn wrote: Hey Donald (and others) ... Is anybody actually using this framework ie. containerless assembly? I was just thinking of removing this assembly prior to seeing this change. At one point in time this was