Re: xbean 3.5 release?

2009-01-23 Thread Joe Bohn

Thanks for the response Jacek. 

If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and create a release candidate now. 
However, I am sensitive to the fact that I have not been contributing
directly to this subproject ... so if somebody would rather do the release
instead of me then please, don't be shy and speak up.

In the event that nobody objects; I have some questions:
It appears the the maven release process has been used in the past to
release directly from trunk without creating a branch.   Is that correct?   
I also notice that there is no dependency on genesis and comments to the
effect that this is desired.  So, I will keep things as-is.

Also, as the current snapshot is 3.5-SNAPSHOT the new release will be 3.5.  
I assume this is desired.  I ask because I noticed that the previous three
releases were 3.4.x and I don't personally know if the changes that have
been integrated are considered sufficient to bump the release to 3.5.

Anything else that I should be aware of?

Thanks,
Joe




Jacek Laskowski wrote:
 
 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net wrote:

 What is the status of the asm shading issue?  Can we pursue a release
 yet?
 
 Go with it. If I don't finish it before the release goes out it's to
 be included in the next one.
 
 Jacek
 
 -- 
 Jacek Laskowski
 Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/xbean-3.5-release--tp20795885p21625992.html
Sent from the xbean-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: xbean 3.5 release?

2009-01-21 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net wrote:

 What is the status of the asm shading issue?  Can we pursue a release yet?

Go with it. If I don't finish it before the release goes out it's to
be included in the next one.

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl


Re: xbean 3.5 release?

2009-01-20 Thread Joe Bohn

What is the status of the asm shading issue?  Can we pursue a release yet?

Thanks,
Joe


Jacek Laskowski wrote:
 
 On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net wrote:

 So can somebody push a release for 3.5?  Are there active issues that
 need to
 be resolved prior to a 3.5 release (I've seen some Geronimo JIRAs that
 might
 be xbean issues)?
 
 Wait a bit until I get the asm shading issue sorted out. It's not been
 reported yet, and am doing it now how to work it around.
 
 Jacek
 
 -- 
 Jacek Laskowski
 Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/xbean-3.5-release--tp20795885p21567629.html
Sent from the xbean-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: xbean 3.5 release?

2009-01-07 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net wrote:

 So can somebody push a release for 3.5?  Are there active issues that need to
 be resolved prior to a 3.5 release (I've seen some Geronimo JIRAs that might
 be xbean issues)?

Wait a bit until I get the asm shading issue sorted out. It's not been
reported yet, and am doing it now how to work it around.

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl


Re: xbean 3.5 release?

2009-01-06 Thread Joe Bohn

So can somebody push a release for 3.5?  Are there active issues that need to
be resolved prior to a 3.5 release (I've seen some Geronimo JIRAs that might
be xbean issues)?   

If nobody volunteers to push a 3.5 release I guess that I could do it given
that I am a committer on Geronimo.  However, it seems inappropriate given
that I haven't been contributing to xbean directly  but I'll do it if
you want me to (or if nobody else volunteers).   We need to get this going
ASAP for our Geronimo 2.2 plans.

Thanks,
Joe


gnodet wrote:
 
 Sounds good to me.
 
 On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net wrote:

 As many of you already know from the Geronimo dev list - we're looking to
 release Geronimo 2.2 by mid January.  However, we need a number of
 snapshots
 released prior to that and xBean trunk (3.5-SNAPSHOT) is among them for
 xbean-finder, xbean-naming, and xbean-reflect.  Any possibility we could
 get
 an xBean 3.5 release within the next few weeks?

 Thanks,
 Joe
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/xbean-3.5-release--tp20795885p20795885.html
 Sent from the xbean-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 
 
 
 -- 
 Cheers,
 Guillaume Nodet
 
 Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
 
 Open Source SOA
 http://fusesource.com
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/xbean-3.5-release--tp20795885p21312341.html
Sent from the xbean-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



xbean 3.5 release?

2008-12-02 Thread Joe Bohn

As many of you already know from the Geronimo dev list - we're looking to
release Geronimo 2.2 by mid January.  However, we need a number of snapshots
released prior to that and xBean trunk (3.5-SNAPSHOT) is among them for
xbean-finder, xbean-naming, and xbean-reflect.  Any possibility we could get
an xBean 3.5 release within the next few weeks?

Thanks,
Joe
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/xbean-3.5-release--tp20795885p20795885.html
Sent from the xbean-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: xbean 3.5 release?

2008-12-02 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Sounds good to me.

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 As many of you already know from the Geronimo dev list - we're looking to
 release Geronimo 2.2 by mid January.  However, we need a number of snapshots
 released prior to that and xBean trunk (3.5-SNAPSHOT) is among them for
 xbean-finder, xbean-naming, and xbean-reflect.  Any possibility we could get
 an xBean 3.5 release within the next few weeks?

 Thanks,
 Joe
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://www.nabble.com/xbean-3.5-release--tp20795885p20795885.html
 Sent from the xbean-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com