On 11.03.2018 17:29, MG wrote:
On 11.03.2018 14:58, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 10.03.2018 20:33, MG wrote:
Hi Jochen,
I was not aware that Groovy is so sophisticated in its expression
analysis, that it actually uses intersection types
you actually do not have much of a choice. It is an AS
Hi Jochen,
Should we remove ACC_SYNTHETIC?
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
2.6 is just 3.0 backported to JDK7 (minus those features which don't
backport easily without a JVM8).
Most users should be skipping 2.6 and going straight to 3.0 which is where
our focus should be ... soon.
2.6 is meant to help people start moving towards Parrot who are stuck on
JDK7. Given it has
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Cédric Champeau wrote:
> [...] Honestly I'd be in favor of only maintaining 2 branches: 2.5.x and
> 3.0.x.
>
I am hoping that's where we are by the end of the year.
Cheers, Paul.
On 11.03.2018 14:58, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 10.03.2018 20:33, MG wrote:
Hi Jochen,
I was not aware that Groovy is so sophisticated in its expression
analysis, that it actually uses intersection types
you actually do not have much of a choice. It is an AST-only
representation only thou
On Sun, 2018-03-11 at 15:24 +, Russel Winder wrote:
> […]
>
> Where does 2.6.x git into this?
>
[…]
s/git/fit/
>
--
Russel.
===
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.
On Sun, 2018-03-11 at 15:12 +0100, Cédric Champeau wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm wondering if it's reasonable to continue maintaining 2.4.x. We
> have a
> long standing 2.5 release waiting, as well as 2.6 and master. Given
> the
> number of maintainers we have, I feel it's just slowing us down, and
>
Hi Cédric,
Before 2.5.0 GA is out, we have to maintain 2.4.x IMO.
According to the original plan, 2.5.x will be a short life release, we
will focus on 2.6.x and 3.0.x soon.
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
I do. It's long overdue that 2.5 should be out. By working on 4 (!)
different branches, we just can't manage to publish 2.5, this is a shame.
2018-03-11 15:23 GMT+01:00 Mauro Molinari :
> Il 11/03/2018 15:12, Cédric Champeau ha scritto:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm wondering if it's reasonable to con
Il 11/03/2018 15:12, Cédric Champeau ha scritto:
Hi folks,
I'm wondering if it's reasonable to continue maintaining 2.4.x. We
have a long standing 2.5 release waiting, as well as 2.6 and master.
Given the number of maintainers we have, I feel it's just slowing us
down, and we need to move for
Hi folks,
I'm wondering if it's reasonable to continue maintaining 2.4.x. We have a
long standing 2.5 release waiting, as well as 2.6 and master. Given the
number of maintainers we have, I feel it's just slowing us down, and we
need to move forward. Honestly I'd be in favor of only maintaining 2
b
On 10.03.2018 20:33, MG wrote:
Hi Jochen,
I was not aware that Groovy is so sophisticated in its expression
analysis, that it actually uses intersection types
you actually do not have much of a choice. It is an AST-only
representation only though.
[...]
3. It would, on the other hand, al
As a side note, `var` of Java10+ supports the following usage[1]:
```
var person = new Object() {
String name = "bob";
int age = 5;
};
System.out.println(person.name + " aged " + person.age);
```
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
[1]
http://benjiweber.co.uk/blog/2018/03/03/representing-the-impractical
13 matches
Mail list logo
