Hi,
its correct not to include a module-info.java, however groovy should
define its Automatic-Module-Name.
http://blog.joda.org/2017/05/java-se-9-jpms-automatic-modules.html
Many other projects are already doing it, e.g.,
https://github.com/mockito/mockito/issues/1189
Until the fine graine
Thank you Paul!
2017-11-20 14:59 GMT+01:00 Paul King :
> I created an issue to track this:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8387
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, this is risky when you update ASM to 6.0. I had the same issue
>> during re
I created an issue to track this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8387
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, this is risky when you update ASM to 6.0. I had the same issue during
> repackage, but I fixed it:
>
> https://github.com/policeman-tools/forbi
Hi,
Yes, this is risky when you update ASM to 6.0. I had the same issue during
repackage, but I fixed it:
https://github.com/policeman-tools/forbidden-apis/commit/1654d5d38e40ee500ca7ae82b146ed6fcfba0827
Am 20. November 2017 08:34:02 MEZ schrieb "Cédric Champeau"
:
>I don't find any evidence o
I don't find any evidence of `module-info` file on `master` or 2.6.X. On
the other hand, we have the ASM module-info file bundled, because we
repackage. This is a mistake that needs to be fixed. So, false alarm,
Daniel: WE didn't add a module-info file: a dependency of ours, ASM, has
one, and when
We should remove it: it doesn't make sense to have a module info at this
point, when we don't even know what we require, export, and when all of our
dependencies are not modules. And I'm not talking about our different
artifacts. If this was an experiment, it shouldn't have landed on master.
It wil
Hi Cédric,
I do not know who contributed the module-info, which seems to exist
for a long time.
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
Since when did we integrate a module info file? We should not. Please, stop
integrating such changes without discussions.
Le 20 nov. 2017 8:10 AM, "Daniel Sun" a écrit :
> Please try to use Groovy 2.6.0, which is designed as a fat module and
> contains a module-info class file.
>
> Cheers,
> Dan
Please try to use Groovy 2.6.0, which is designed as a fat module and
contains a module-info class file.
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
Hello,
Tried to compile a spring boot application with groovy+java9, however it
does not detect the main class which is in groovy.
Can anyone please point to a sample which consists of
groovy , java9 , maven with spring boot
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.
10 matches
Mail list logo