No. GProperties to Properties is similar with GString to String, GProperties
is much more powerful than Properties, so I recommend groovy users use
GProperties where Properties is used. If GProperties only process the file
with new file extension, we can not replace Properties in existing groovy
Did you consider using different file extension?
—
Daniil Ovchinnikov
JetBrains
> On 2 Nov 2018, at 18:39, Daniel.Sun wrote:
>
> I've added some doc to show the usage:
>
>
I've added some doc to show the usage:
https://github.com/apache/groovy/blob/3775edeabde19eb5229e840ec2ffc1dcf90634db/src/main/groovy/groovy/util/GProperties.groovy
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
-
Daniel Sun
Apache Groovy committer
Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me
Twitter: @daniel_sun
--
Sent
Am 22.10.2018 um 22:34 schrieb Guillaume Laforge:
Damn, MG will tell me again I'm reacting negatively to Daniel's ideas
but... :-)
No, no - it's not a knee jerk reaction. In this case I see both points,
and am torn on what I would prefer...
(Generally speaking, while having a "regex
Agree with Guillaume here: In my (bad) experience, 15 Facebook friends
is all it takes to swing nearly any poll in your favour and get a
landslide victory.
Am 24.10.2018 um 16:12 schrieb Guillaume Laforge:
Not necessarily. Discussions are better, leading towards a consensus.
Polls can have
Here are some tests to show its usage:
https://github.com/apache/groovy/blob/96e94cf80ca4fc8449231e2f92508bca516bce87/src/test/groovy/util/GPropertiesTest.groovy
and here are the relevant properties files:
1,
Can there be an example of its use shown before it is automatically merged into
master/3.0? Even the pull request and javadoc of the class do not describe its
usage. How can someone evaluate it this way and what are the alternatives if
this does not exist?
Gotcha.
The `GProperties` will be included in 3.0.0.
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
Agreed, we normally don't add new features in bug fix releases, but only in
main releases.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:07 AM Cédric Champeau
wrote:
> -1 to including GProperties in a bugfix release. There's apparently
> discussion about the implication of doing this, and a bugfix release is not
>
I was also thinking of a Boolean in a constructor.
Le ven. 2 nov. 2018 à 07:23, Paul King a écrit :
> While I think security is very important to consider, I am unsure whether
> the switch is the way to go. Such switches are global in nature and that
> means you can't as easily as you might
While I think security is very important to consider, I am unsure whether
the switch is the way to go. Such switches are global in nature and that
means you can't as easily as you might like use different GProperty
instances in different contexts with different security contexts.
Given use of
11 matches
Mail list logo
