The vote has passed with 5 binding +1 votes and 2 additional +1 votes. I'll
proceed with next steps.
On 23 Mar. 2018 5:04 pm, "Paul King" wrote:
>
> Dear development community,
>
> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.4.15 release! This is
> mainly to fix a
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 12:04 AM Paul King wrote:
>
> Dear development community,
>
> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.4.15 release! This is
> mainly to fix a regression in calling static methods in interfaces. We were
> trying to improve the
+1
> On 23 Mar 2018, at 08:04, Paul King wrote:
>
>
> Dear development community,
>
> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.4.15 release! This is
> mainly to fix a regression in calling static methods in interfaces. We were
> trying to improve the JDK9
Yep, thanks everyone for the fast response!
But we still need to wait the 3 days as per Apache voting guidelines.
Just a reminder: a subsequent -1 vote would cancel out one of the already
cast +1 votes.
Cheers, Paul.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:40 PM, Daniel.Sun wrote:
> 3
Am 23.03.2018 um 12:47 schrieb Paul King:
We temporarily reverted the ASM change but that ended up not being the
problem, so I put it back the same as in 2.4.14.
The problem was that there was no Java8 plugin for 2_4_X so neither the
code fixes from GROOVY-8338 nor the respective test ran -
3 votes from PMC members have been collected :)
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
We temporarily reverted the ASM change but that ended up not being the
problem, so I put it back the same as in 2.4.14.
The problem was that there was no Java8 plugin for 2_4_X so neither the
code fixes from GROOVY-8338 nor the respective test ran - fixed now with an
empty(*) Java8 plugin for
Am 23.03.2018 um 08:04 schrieb Paul King:
Dear development community,
I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.4.15 release! This is
mainly to fix a regression in calling static methods in interfaces. We
were trying to improve the JDK9 experience but on the 2.4 branch it
caused
+1
My smoke test (on JDK 8) went fine.
Nothing special to report.
Guillaume
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Daniel Sun wrote:
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
>
--
Guillaume Laforge
+1
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
Dear development community,
I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.4.15 release! This is
mainly to fix a regression in calling static methods in interfaces. We were
trying to improve the JDK9 experience but on the 2.4 branch it caused
existing functionality to be impacted even on
11 matches
Mail list logo