Re: What the... static compile by default

Hi Daniel, On 12.05.2018 15:51, Daniel.Sun wrote: Hi mg, I am trying to reduce the time on smart phone and computer to relax eyes :) That sounds like a good idea :-) (Have you already tried reducing the blue component on every display ? I do that with every monitor - at first the

Re: What the... static compile by default

On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 06:08 -0700, Daniel.Sun wrote: > Hi Russel, > > Yep. Eye drops can relieve my pain. It have to take a bit long time to > recover... > Good that the drops deal with the pain. Relax as much as possible to make the recovery time as short as possible. -- Russel.

Re: What the... static compile by default

My pleasure :-) Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: What the... static compile by default

On 12 May 2018, at 0:57, Daniel.Sun wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for your kind words. As the commit log shows, I'm back and > trying to fix some STC issues after having a rest. This is very good news indeed. Thank you for your contributions! JSB -- Jeff Scott Brown OCI Partner and

Re: What the... static compile by default

Hi mg, I am trying to reduce the time on smart phone and computer to relax eyes :) As for Groovy, I plan to support raw string[1] introduced by Java11 since no similar thing in Groovy. Some days ago I discussed it with Guillaume, and I will start a VOTE thread to collect three +1

Re: What the... static compile by default

Hi Russel, Yep. Eye drops can relieve my pain. It have to take a bit long time to recover... Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: What the... static compile by default

On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 22:57 -0700, Daniel.Sun wrote: […] > > P.S. Recently I'm suffering from conjunctivitis... > Daniel, Hopefully medics have given you something to relieve the itching and pain, and that it clears up quickly. -- Russel. == Dr

Re: What the... static compile by default

On 11.05.2018 20:34, Sven Reimers wrote: Hi all, Apache NetBeans is already using gitbox ... works very well for us. is there any page where I can see what it offers without setting it up? The link given in this thread here so far is not suitable. bye Jochen

Re: What the... static compile by default

Yep. merging request is annoying and will cost us more time if conflicts exist. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: What the... static compile by default

Hi all, Thanks for your kind words. As the commit log shows, I'm back and trying to fix some STC issues after having a rest. P.S. Recently I'm suffering from conjunctivitis... Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: What the... static compile by default

Hi all, Apache NetBeans is already using gitbox ... works very well for us. Sven Remko Popma schrieb am Fr., 11. Mai 2018, 18:06: > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/ > > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Mario Garcia > wrote: > >> Remko Could you

Re: What the... static compile by default

https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/ On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Mario Garcia wrote: > Remko Could you add a link to Gitbox ? > > El vie., 11 may. 2018 a las 17:52, Remko Popma () > escribió: > >> Over at Log4j we just decided to migrate from

Re: What the... static compile by default

Remko Could you add a link to Gitbox ? El vie., 11 may. 2018 a las 17:52, Remko Popma () escribió: > Over at Log4j we just decided to migrate from git-wip-us to gitbox >

Re: What the... static compile by default

Over at Log4j we just decided to migrate from git-wip-us to gitbox . Using gitbox will allow our projects to integrate better with GitHub > including the

Re: What the... static compile by default

*About Static Compilation changes:* I've used the way it's documented in the official documentation, and I agree with Cedric, I don't like having a system property. I see more benefits using the compiler configuration file: - Configuration is more fine grained (apply to all, apply to some

Re: What the... static compile by default

Am 11.05.2018 um 03:42 schrieb Thibault Kruse: [...] However, the meta-concern by Cedric was not addressed it seems. Why is anyone directly working on the master branch of groovy? Is there a technical reason for this, rather than using feature branches, code reviews, and merge approvals?

Re: What the... static compile by default

It seems a bit weird to leave this thread dangling after the dramatic entry scene. The activity on master branch seems to indicate some changes were decided: danielsun1106 committed 2 days ago : Revert "GROOVY-8543: Support setting compileStatic by default via sys… danielsun1106 committed 18

Re: What the... static compile by default

On 07.05.2018 17:54, Cédric Champeau wrote: I'd typically very much prefer a custom file extension for example. That would be my preferred way to give anyone a simple mean to choose static compilation as the default for a Groovy file. Afair the counter argument was, that Groovy compiles any

Re: What the... static compile by default

Hi Daniel, I am very keen for you to maintain your involvement in Groovy. There is no way we'd have Groovy 3 in it's current form without your involvement. I also find your enthusiasm contagious and a welcome addition to the community. Cheers, Paul. >> On 2018/05/07 14:59:09, "Daniel.Sun"

Re: What the... static compile by default

Hi Cedric, I don't think anybody wants anybody to step down (whether that be you, Daniel or whoever) and you make valid points about processes that could be improved. I would however encourage you to re-read your original email to understand how it may impact others. Maybe adjust the tone of your

Re: What the... static compile by default

the lowest priority, it should not collide with all the existing ways to apply @CompileStatic to Groovy code) ? Cheers,mg Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: "Daniel.Sun" <sun...@apache.org> Datum: 07.05.18 16:59 (GMT+01:00) An: d...@groovy.incubator.apache.org Betre

Re: What the... static compile by default

the lowest priority, it should not collide with all the existing ways to apply @CompileStatic to Groovy code) ? Cheers,mg Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: "Daniel.Sun" <sun...@apache.org> Datum: 07.05.18 16:59 (GMT+01:00) An: d...@groovy.incubator.apache.org Betre

Re: What the... static compile by default

Daniel, please note your contribution to Groovy has not gone without notice. Personally, I am very grateful for the work you have done. Moreover, I am grateful for the enthusiasm towards twitter you have shown in every email and tweet. It has been awesome and contagious. I hope you stay in the

Re: What the... static compile by default

Hi Daniel and sorry you are "tired". Maybe the tone I used was inappropriate?, but it wasn't directed at you personally. I'm quite surprised to see some things like that happening on master without any discussion on the MLs. Maybe that's because I expect too much from the developers of Groovy, but

Re: What the... static compile by default

On 2018/05/07 14:59:09, "Daniel.Sun" wrote: Hi Cédric, Feel free to remove any code. To be honest, I am really tired. Bye Groovy community. Cheers, Daniel.Sun } Daniel, Please reconsider. I think the tone at the beginning of this thread was

Re: What the... static compile by default

I hope you don't get discouraged Daniel, you are doing amazing work in the community and currently you and Paul are the main contributors / drivers of the project. Cerdic - whilst I am sure you mean well I gotta say I disagree with your approach to raising issues on the mailing list. There was

Re: What the... static compile by default

Hi Cédric, Feel free to remove any code. To be honest, I am really tired. Bye Groovy community. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Re: What the... static compile by default

Git blame seems to indicate April 13th 2018, and it seems to be related to this ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8543 On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Cédric Champeau wrote: > Hi folks, > > Sorry to be the bad cop again, but when the heck did this

What the... static compile by default

Hi folks, Sorry to be the bad cop again, but when the heck did this land into core: https://github.com/apache/groovy/blob/5443e87882f9b88169876f6d043ed54b5ae9023b/src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/control/CompilerConfiguration.java#L943-L988 As much as I love static compilation, this should