On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Nick Couchman wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Nick Couchman wrote:
>
> > >
> >> >
> >> Perhaps the mapper needs to be bound, just like the webapp's REST
> >> services?
> >>
> >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11987097/how-do-i-
> >>
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Mike Jumper
wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Nick Couchman wrote:
>
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Perhaps the mapper needs to be bound, just like the webapp's REST
> > services?
> > >
> > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11987097/how-do-i-
> > >
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Nick Couchman wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > Perhaps the mapper needs to be bound, just like the webapp's REST
> services?
> >
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11987097/how-do-i-
> > use-a-jersey-exceptionmapper-with-google-guice
> >
>
>
> Yep, that seems to
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Nick Couchman wrote:
> >
>> >
>> Perhaps the mapper needs to be bound, just like the webapp's REST
>> services?
>>
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11987097/how-do-i-
>> use-a-jersey-exceptionmapper-with-google-guice
>>
>
>
> Yep, that seems to be the
>
> >
> >
> Perhaps the mapper needs to be bound, just like the webapp's REST services?
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11987097/how-do-i-
> use-a-jersey-exceptionmapper-with-google-guice
>
Yep, that seems to be the ticket to getting it to work. So, next question,
should this be
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Nick Couchman wrote:
> >
> > IIRC, there are minimum JVM version requirements for Jersey 2.x that
> >>
> > historically prevented us from going that route, but if we're going to
> >> require Java 7 across the board, this is doable.
> >>
> >
> > Okay, I'll see
>
> IIRC, there are minimum JVM version requirements for Jersey 2.x that
>>
> historically prevented us from going that route, but if we're going to
>> require Java 7 across the board, this is doable.
>>
>
> Okay, I'll see what I can figure out with that. Hopefully it won't be
> necessary to make
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Mark Nolan wrote:
> Don't you see those warnings anyway? I can't check right now, but I'm
> fairly certain I've seen them in the log regardless.
>
>
Yeah, Mark, you're right, those show up in a clean build without this, so
that's obviously not the issue.
I
>
> There may be another way, however. Jersey provides for mapping exceptions
> to responses:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15185299/jax-rs-
> jersey-exceptionmappers-user-defined-exception
>
> Perhaps we could define such a mapping for GuacamoleException?
>
>
Okay, I'm game. Took a
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Nick Couchman wrote:
> Hey, everyone,
> I could use some help figuring out how to work this one out. GUACAMOLE-566
> deals with adding the RESTExceptionWrapper to loaded extensions such that
> the extension-specific REST endpoints will deliver similar Guacamole
10 matches
Mail list logo
