All test runs were in an environment where the default time zone was
GMT or GMT+x.
Also there could have been tests that had a side-effect of setting the
default time zone which were run before this test and something
changed the order of execution.
-Nathan
On 3/15/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMA
On Mar 14, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
I apologize for the delay response, I've been a little busy lately.
Hey, we all are.
I ran the test on Sun JRE 5 Update 11 and Sun JRE 6 and this bit of
the getI test failed as well.
// Regression test for Hamrony-2959
Date dat
Great, thanks. I've applied the patch.
On 3/14/07, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Nathan,
I think I got the point :)
the date "Dec 24 00:00:01 GMT 2000" is Dec 23 for people in the west
(GMT-1 to GMT-12) whereas we have entered Dec 24 in China(GMT+8),
Russia(GMT+3) and UK(GMT).
I ha
Thanks Nathan,
I think I got the point :)
the date "Dec 24 00:00:01 GMT 2000" is Dec 23 for people in the west
(GMT-1 to GMT-12) whereas we have entered Dec 24 in China(GMT+8),
Russia(GMT+3) and UK(GMT).
I have uploaded a patch on Harmony-2959 which has been reopened.
On 3/15/07, Nathan Beyer <
I apologize for the delay response, I've been a little busy lately.
I ran the test on Sun JRE 5 Update 11 and Sun JRE 6 and this bit of
the getI test failed as well.
// Regression test for Hamrony-2959
Date date = new Date(Date.parse("Jan 15 00:00:01 GMT 2000"));
GregorianCal
Hi Nathan,
This testcase passes on my winxp sp2 and ubuntu with ibm vme, besides
our build system on debian. I can not reproduce it and IIRC there is
no DST in Dec and Jan. Could you pls help me to verify whether it
passes on RI and the output of code[1] and the testcase[2]. Thanks a
lot.
[1]
D
I hope not.
According to my Win2K builds, this test has failed since 3/7 through
today, so it seems to consistently fail.
-Nathan
On 3/11/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Heh - did we have some problem w/ DST?
geir
On Mar 11, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
> I'm seei
Heh - did we have some problem w/ DST?
geir
On Mar 11, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
I'm seeing a consistent failure for this unit test on WinXP and
Win2000 on the IBM VM. Should this test be excluded or at least the
method disabled?
test_getI Failure expected:<346> but was:<345
I'm seeing a consistent failure for this unit test on WinXP and
Win2000 on the IBM VM. Should this test be excluded or at least the
method disabled?
test_getI Failure expected:<346> but was:<345>
-Nathan
