ok, my $.02
HBase has plenty of features that already make it worthwhile to use, so
stability is lot more important than features (at this stage of HBase's
life).
Once the core is super-solid, it is easier to add features and yet produce
stable releases quickly.
Items which are really not
Hi All
Because of my checkin for HBASE-4558(trunk) and HBASE-4540(0.90) i had
broken the build by missing the check in for TestMasterFailOver.java
I am very sorry for the mistake that i committed and i will ensure that here
then i will not cause any build failure. I will be more careful
See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.90/321/changes
Changes:
[ramkrishna] HBASE-4540 - Addendum for TestMasterFailOver (Ram)
[ramkrishna] HBASE-4540 OpenedRegionHandler is not enforcing atomicity of the
operation it is performing (Ram)
--
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92/60/changes
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92/59/
--
[...truncated 6052 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestStoreFile
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 65.742 sec
Forking command line: /bin/sh -c cd
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/2323/changes
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Ramkrishna S Vasudevan
ramakrish...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi All
Because of my checkin for HBASE-4558(trunk) and HBASE-4540(0.90) i had
broken the build by missing the check in for TestMasterFailOver.java
I am very sorry for the mistake that i committed and i
See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.90/323/
When I look over here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase/
I only see them published for 0.91-SNAPSHOT. Any reason
not to publish for 0.92-SNAPSHOT?
Thanks,
Roman.
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92/61/changes
Changes:
[larsh] HBASE-4556 Fix all incorrect uses of InternalScanner.next(...)
--
[...truncated 6126 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.rest.TestMultiRowResource
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
When I look over here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase/
I only see them published for 0.91-SNAPSHOT. Any reason
not to publish for 0.92-SNAPSHOT?
None.
We should make
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
When I look over here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase/
I only see them published for 0.91-SNAPSHOT. Any
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
I think I have enough Apache infra karma to make both happen. Since I need
the artifacts right away would it be ok if I push once manually and change
this
job later on?
+1 on all of this below.
I'm all for frequent releases. Big features move to branches and the author is
required to keep it up against whatever the current trunk is.
And by forcing ourselves to keep features/improvements into trunk rather than
into the currently active branch, we will
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92/62/changes
Just today 3 our region servers went down for no obvious reason and M/R jobs
started failing after that (we are on 0.90.4 + some Ted's patch)
You have a already lot of features , could you please focus on just two of
them : performance and stability of a core functionality.
We need Put, Get
Vladimir, I appreciate the contributions of your company and welcome your
personal input around the roadmap and future of HBase.
However, tying your perception of the community's overemphasis on features to
the fact that you had three RS go down today is a bit of a reach. About a
million
17 matches
Mail list logo
