[Subject changed]
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Josh Elser josh.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I was a little surprised when I noticed method additions to
InterfaceAudience.Public annotated classes. This means that a user could
write code against 1.0.1 that would not work against 1.0.0 which seems
I think these changes are Okay.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
[Subject changed]
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Josh Elser josh.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I was a little surprised when I noticed method additions to
InterfaceAudience.Public
All,
We're now just **two days away** from my proposed RC date! That means we're
very close to pencils down on new features for 1.1.
I believe most of the major features we had outstanding have landed. The
notable exception being HBASE-11339 MOB. I think Jon is close to calling a
merge vote for
Let me get HBASE-13452, as I spent some time looking at this code before.
-M
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Nick Dimiduk ndimi...@apache.org wrote:
All,
We're now just **two days away** from my proposed RC date! That means we're
very close to pencils down on new features for 1.1.
I
My mistake Jerry, you're correct. My pre-coffee brain was thinking that by
upgrading Hadoop we'd promote the version of Jackson under us. This is not
the case because we have an explicit dependency (though maybe maven is
promoting this for us for the builds anyway?)
Point is, we have issues that
Hi, Nick
I probably missed something here. Upgrading to hadoop 2.6 would help
HBASE-13149?
HBASE-13149 and HBASE-13339 are making a strong argument for us to bump
the Hadoop version to 2.6 for this release.
Jerry
While I can understand the desire to want to add things, I do think it
makes things harder for users to reliably write code against versions of
HBase which (by their view) should be completely compatible with one
another.
Take this extremely hypothetical situation: I'm new to HBase and start
I'd much rather we stick with the definitions used in Semantic Versioning.
Our use is already confusing enough given our matrix of compatibilities
that don't get major version for breaking protections.
We've previously discussed how we'll do additional minor releases when
there's sufficient
Just to clarify something, I've proposed edits that clarify the de-facto
practice, since additional methods are turning up in patch releases, but am
not taking a position.
So far we don't have consensus.
+ HBase uses Semantic Versioning for its release versioning with a caveat
that methods and
Andy -- I understood your intent, but thanks for clarifying. (as well as
taking the time to break this discussion out in the first place). I
agree with your assessment.
re: Sean's comments, if it wasn't clear by me asking in the first place,
I also think sticking as close as possible to
I'd love to have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13466 in if
no one objects.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Nick Dimiduk ndimi...@gmail.com wrote:
My mistake Jerry, you're correct. My pre-coffee brain was thinking that by
upgrading Hadoop we'd promote the version of Jackson under
You have my attention all the time, Nick :-)
We need the folks to get an agreement on HBASE-13149. Sean, Andy, Enis?
Of course the last resort is we do nothing but document it with manual
workaround or manual jar replacement in 1.1.
I am available to do any verification if there is any proposal.
Jonathan Hsieh created HBASE-13531:
--
Summary: After 4/18/15 merge, we have started encountering
failures of TestAcidGuarantees#testMobScanAtomicity
Key: HBASE-13531
URL:
I would like to have it https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13431
in.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Jerry He jerry...@gmail.com wrote:
You have my attention all the time, Nick :-)
We need the folks to get an agreement on HBASE-13149. Sean, Andy, Enis?
Of course the last resort is
On Apr 22, 2015 4:40 PM, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com wrote:
I think the agreement is to continue with the RC.
One note... in the japi report, I was a little surprised when I noticed
method additions to InterfaceAudience.Public annotated classes. This means
that a user could write code
Apekshit Sharma created HBASE-13534:
---
Summary: Change HBase master WebUI to explicitly mention if it is
a backup master
Key: HBASE-13534
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13534
How about collecting IOException's in checkRegionConsistencyConcurrently()
and wrap them in MultipleIOException:
/** Encapsulate a list of {@link IOException} into an {@link IOException} */
public class MultipleIOException extends IOException {
Cheers
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Stephen
I think the agreement is to continue with the RC.
One note... in the japi report, I was a little surprised when I noticed
method additions to InterfaceAudience.Public annotated classes. This means
that a user could write code against 1.0.1 that would not work against
1.0.0 which seems
Yeah, maybe I had an issue with some assets failing to load. That's messy
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote:
no I can't reproduce the behavior now, it's definitely still threaded when
I'm logged out. the html looks like it should also still work if some
The whole feature is frustrating. Makes it hard to track the conversation
without scanning al over the place.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
Yeah, maybe I had an issue with some assets failing to load. That's messy
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:26 PM,
Nick Dimiduk created HBASE-13533:
Summary: section on configuring ~/.m2/settings.xml has no anchor
Key: HBASE-13533
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13533
Project: HBase
I would love to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13260 in if
possible.
Enis
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:49 PM, rajeshb...@apache.org
chrajeshbab...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to have it https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13431
in.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:10 AM,
Consider it harmful? That's fine by me, I'll stop using it right now.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Nick Dimiduk ndimi...@gmail.com wrote:
The whole feature is frustrating. Makes it hard to track the conversation
without scanning al over the place.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Andrew
stack created HBASE-13535:
-
Summary: Regions unassigned
Key: HBASE-13535
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13535
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: stack
hbase-1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell resolved HBASE-11758.
Resolution: Duplicate
Meta region location should be cached
Victor Xu created HBASE-13530:
-
Summary: Add param for bulkload wait duration in HRegion.
Key: HBASE-13530
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13530
Project: HBase
Issue Type:
Is it just me or are the 'Reply' links for threading replies on JIRA
sometimes present and sometimes not ?
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Not present if you aren't logged in, also existing responses not threaded
if you aren't logged in, I think?
Still can't stand the implementation.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
Is it just me or are the 'Reply' links for threading replies on JIRA
I can't really say why existing responses aren't threaded if you
aren't logged in, it doesn't need session information.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote:
Not present if you aren't logged in, also existing responses not threaded
if you aren't logged in, I
no I can't reproduce the behavior now, it's definitely still threaded when
I'm logged out. the html looks like it should also still work if some
assets fail to load from CDN.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can't really say why existing responses
Apekshit Sharma created HBASE-13532:
---
Summary: Make UnknownScannerException logging less scary
Key: HBASE-13532
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13532
Project: HBase
Issue
Matteo Bertozzi created HBASE-13529:
---
Summary: Procedure v2 - WAL Improvements
Key: HBASE-13529
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13529
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-task
32 matches
Mail list logo
