Oh, sorry! I missed that it was just merged. Thanks again
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 7:06 AM Wellington Chevreuil <
wellington.chevre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've just got the approval from Duo and merged it. Am cherry-picking to
> lower branches now.
>
> Em ter., 2 de abr. de 2024 às 12:02, Bryan
I've just got the approval from Duo and merged it. Am cherry-picking to
lower branches now.
Em ter., 2 de abr. de 2024 às 12:02, Bryan Beaudreault <
bbeaudrea...@apache.org> escreveu:
> Thanks Wellington. Was there a reason to only merge that to master?
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 5:23 AM
Thanks Wellington. Was there a reason to only merge that to master?
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 5:23 AM Wellington Chevreuil <
wellington.chevre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Regarding TestBucketCachePersister flakeyness, I have noticed that last
> week and had submitted a fix in
>
Regarding TestBucketCachePersister flakeyness, I have noticed that last
week and had submitted a fix in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28458.
Em sex., 29 de mar. de 2024 às 15:41, Bryan Beaudreault <
bbeaudrea...@apache.org> escreveu:
> Thanks. I pushed the addendum fix to
Thanks. I pushed the addendum fix to HBASE-27657. I will start another RC
on Monday so that people have time to notice any other issues to include.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:24 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang)
wrote:
> The other parts of the RC are good.
>
> I ran all the UTs and also started a mini cluster
The other parts of the RC are good.
I ran all the UTs and also started a mini cluster to test basic shell
commands, all good.
Will vote a +1 after fixing the above compatibility issue.
Thanks.
Bryan Beaudreault 于2024年3月29日周五 23:10写道:
>
> Thanks for catching that. I looked at the compatibility
Thanks for catching that. I looked at the compatibility report but missed
that one. I will work on fixing.
If anyone else wants to take a look for other reasons to sink the RC, I
will also tackle those before the next one.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:07 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang)
wrote:
> Sorry but -1
Sure. Will file a jira issue when I see the next time.
And usually a flaky test is not a blocker for a release.
Thanks.
Bryan Beaudreault 于2024年3月29日周五 23:04写道:
>
> Given the flakiness, seems like something we should fix, but likely not a
> blocker here. Can you file a jira with the error you
Sorry but -1 binding
After checking the compatibility report, I found that we made a
mistake when implementing HBASE-27657.
The 'createConnection(Configuration conf, ExecutorService pool, final
User user)' method was lost... We should keep it and make it call the
newly introduced
Given the flakiness, seems like something we should fix, but likely not a
blocker here. Can you file a jira with the error you were seeing? I still
haven't seen it fail
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:56 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang)
wrote:
> OK, I tried several more times, it passed...
>
> Bryan Beaudreault
OK, I tried several more times, it passed...
Bryan Beaudreault 于2024年3月29日周五 19:21写道:
>
> TestBucketCachePersister is passing for me locally. I've tried it a few
> times and no issues
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 9:19 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
>
> > TestBucketCachePersister always fail for me
TestBucketCachePersister is passing for me locally. I've tried it a few
times and no issues
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 9:19 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> TestBucketCachePersister always fail for me locally.
>
> Is this a known issue which is not very critical?
>
> Bryan Beaudreault 于2024年3月28日周四
TestBucketCachePersister always fail for me locally.
Is this a known issue which is not very critical?
Bryan Beaudreault 于2024年3月28日周四 04:01写道:
>
> Please vote on this Apache hbase release candidate,
> hbase-2.6.0RC2
>
> The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this
Please vote on this Apache hbase release candidate,
hbase-2.6.0RC2
The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache hbase 2.6.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
The tag to be voted on is 2.6.0RC2:
14 matches
Mail list logo