Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

With 4 binding +1, 1 non-binding +1, and no binding -1, the vote passes! Thank you everyone for voting. I want to give a special thanks to Dieter for raising his non-binding -1. The vote is acknowledged, and we will try to prioritize reviewing & merging the issues he raised so that we can do a

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

Here's my own binding +1: * Signature: ok * Checksum : ok * Rat check (11.0.18): ok - mvn clean apache-rat:check * Built from source (11.0.18): ok - mvn clean install -DskipTests * Unit tests pass (11.0.18): ok - mvn

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

+1 (binding) * Signature: ok * Checksum : ok * Rat check (1.8.0_412): ok - mvn clean apache-rat:check * Built from source (1.8.0_412): ok - mvn clean install -DskipTests * Built from source (11.0.23): ok - mvn clean install -D hadoop.profile=3.0 -DskipTests * Built from source (17.0.11): ok

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

Related, Dieter, I'm going to try to rally some review bandwidth on the jiras you have linked. I really appreciate your team's efforts in reporting and providing fixes for these issues. Some of them slipped past me, but I'm now watching all of them and hope to get to them soon. On Tue, May 7,

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

Yes, at my employer we are running daily backups using the new system, including incremental backups, on ~130 clusters including 2 production clusters. We've had troubles with incremental backups on a few clusters, but most have been fine. We've also got end-to-end recurring acceptance tests which

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

The new backups system is one of the "flagship" features for the 2.6 release line so it's a shame that these issues with incremental manifest tracking remain. If I'm not mistaken, though, a full backup still works as expected, so these bugs do not prevent taking a backup entirely. I agree that

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

This sounds very reasonable to me, especially with the promise of a quick follow on release of 2.6.1. — I apologize for not voting on the 2.6 candidates. I will set up a VM somewhere where I can drive release candidate tests by phone for the next time but did not think of this in advance. On

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

I'm +1 on release 2.6.0 first. For a new minor release line, we could do more aggressive patch releasing in the beginning if there are lots of commits get in. For example, if we could get 20+ commits soon, we could do 2.6.1 release after two weeks. Bryan Beaudreault 于2024年5月7日周二 18:54写道： > >

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

Thanks Dieter. I’m aware of these issues, but I don’t think they are blockers. The idea with releasing backups was that it would be experimental in 2.6, as a way to get the feature into more of the community’s hands and increase development. So far that’s working, as evidenced by your team’s great

RE: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

-1 non binding I've done some testing of the backup-restore feature the past days, and there's still some issues that I think really should be solved for a first release version. PRs are available for all of these: * HBASE-28539: backup merging does not work when using cloud storage as

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

+1 non-binding - Changes, Releasenotes, Signature: Ok - Building from source JDK 17 : Ok - Rat check : Ok - Unit test: Ok - Performed migration from 2.5.2 to 2.6.0: Ok. - Ran basic sanity of CRUD, snapshots, PE, bulkloads: Ok Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 6:29 PM Peter Somogyi

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

+1 binding * changes, release notes: ok * Signature: ok * Checksum : ok * Rat check (17.0.11): ok - mvn clean apache-rat:check -D hadoop.profile=3.0 * Built from source (17.0.11): ok - mvn clean install -D hadoop.profile=3.0 -DskipTests

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

+1 binding, will go out in the next several days so let me vote now. Checked sigs and sums: Matched Rat check: Passed LICENSE and NOTICE: In place Compatibility report: Most of incompatibility are from thirdparty jars like zookeeper, the only one is RegionInfo.UNDEFINED, which is IA.Private so

[VOTE] The third release candidate for 2.6.0, RC4, is available

Please vote on this Apache hbase release candidate, hbase-2.6.0RC4 The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache hbase 2.6.0 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... The tag to be voted on is 2.6.0RC4: