Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

Same. Thanks to all for such a quick and lively vote and thanks to Stack for all these RC builds. On Jan 15, 2018 10:29 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote: > Apologies for missing the vote. We have enough now. Next time. > Great progress! > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Stack

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

Apologies for missing the vote. We have enough now. Next time. Great progress! On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Stack wrote: > Thanks to all who have voted so far. It is great to see the votes coming > in. Need one more PMC-er +1 please. > Thanks, > S > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

+1(binding) Download the bin tarball and use it to start a 5 node cluster: OK Use LTT to load and verify 1M rows: OK Checked Web UI during the test: OK, the qps number seems correct. Execute several commands in shell: OK 2018-01-16 14:01 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) : > I'm

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

I'm running LTT now. Will be back to vote soon. 2018-01-16 12:54 GMT+08:00 Stack : > Thanks to all who have voted so far. It is great to see the votes coming > in. Need one more PMC-er +1 please. > Thanks, > S > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Stack wrote:

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

Does this also happen on master? 2018-01-16 12:12 GMT+08:00 Ted Yu : > I was able to reproduce the test failure for TestReplicationAdmin. > Here was the first error: > > https://pastebin.com/TVpjjKRz > > There were several similar stack traces afterwards. > > FYI > > On Mon,

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

Thanks to all who have voted so far. It is great to see the votes coming in. Need one more PMC-er +1 please. Thanks, S On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Stack wrote: > The fourth release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at: > >

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

I was able to reproduce the test failure for TestReplicationAdmin. Here was the first error: https://pastebin.com/TVpjjKRz There were several similar stack traces afterwards. FYI On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 7:28 AM, Balazs Meszaros < balazs.mesza...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 > > - checksums,

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

+1 - checksum ok - signature ok. - built from src. - Ran PE tool. Performed Randomwrites and random reads. No issues observed. Regards Ram On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Balazs Meszaros < balazs.mesza...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 > > - checksums, signatures: OK > - build from src: OK (8u112)

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

+1 - checksums, signatures: OK - build from src: OK (8u112) - unit tests passes except TestReplicationAdmin. Am I the only one who cannot run it? It fails constantly, but it isn't in our flaky list. - LTT with 1M rows works. - Basic shell functionality works. - Web UI for master and RS also seem

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

+1 non-binding Checked MD5: OK Testing the URL of download is available: OK Starting HBase with cluster mode via docker container: OK Import data with 100 million rows and 10 columns to table via ImportTsv: OK Execute basic command via `hbase shell`: OK 2018-01-14 4:23 GMT+08:00 Stack

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

Thanks to the votes and testing so far. Last night, a nightly build on hadoop2 completed but I notice that it has a bunch of tests filtered out [1] (I'm trying to get this facility turned off). There is also a report by Duo that came in last night a test that passes for me fails for him

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

Clean first before running RAT checks. Better? > On Jan 13, 2018, at 8:41 AM, Ashish Singhi wrote: > > I ran RAT check on head of the branch-2 code. > I did first mvn clean install -DskipTests and then ran mvn apache-rat:check > > Anything I am missing or I need to do

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

I ran RAT check on head of the branch-2 code. I did first mvn clean install -DskipTests and then ran mvn apache-rat:check Anything I am missing or I need to do ? Regards, Ashish On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > hbase-spark and hbase-prefix-tree modules

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

hbase-spark and hbase-prefix-tree modules should no longer be part of the hbase 2.0 build process. Can you check the files to see if they were left over from previous build ? Cheers On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Ashish Singhi wrote: > RAT check fails for me, below

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

RAT check fails for me, below error I see in the log file, 4 Unknown Licenses * Files with unapproved licenses: hbase-spark/target/test-classes.-284428056.timestamp hbase-spark/target/classes.786562742.timestamp

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

+1 (no-binding) hbase-2.0.0-beta-1-bin.tar.gz (jdk8u144) - Verified md5sum: ok - Start HBase in standalone mode: ok - Verified with shell, create/disable/enable/drop/get/put/scan/delete: ok - Checked master/regionserver/region Web UI: ok hbase-2.0.0-beta-1-src.tar.gz (jdk8u144) - Verified

Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download

+1 Checked sig and hash. Downloaded locally. Undid and loaded data. Logs look good. Put on cluster. Picks up old data fine. Nothing odd in logs (too much logging but that is another story). St.Ack On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Stack wrote: > The fourth release candidate