stack created HBASE-20498:
-
Summary: [AMv2] Stuck in UnexpectedStateException
Key: HBASE-20498
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20498
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-task
I'm +1 then. would like to see the ref guide changes and heads-up
happen prior to 1.5 branching, but since I don't have the bandwidth to
do it myself I'm not going to vote against anything if it doesn't
happen.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> I think
Zheng Hu created HBASE-20497:
Summary: The getRecoveredQueueStartPos always return -1 in
RecoveredReplicationSourceShipper
Key: HBASE-20497
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20497
Project:
When you have a moment please take the 1.4.4 RC for a spin. It has an
important performance improvement so I'd like to get it out. Ideally voting
closes on the 30th of this month. Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Andrew
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell resolved HBASE-20493.
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
> Port HBASE-19994 (Create a new class for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell resolved HBASE-9465.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Push entries to peer clusters serially
>
Andrew Purtell created HBASE-20496:
--
Summary: TestGlobalThrottler failing on branch-1 since revert of
HBASE-9465
Key: HBASE-20496
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20496
Project:
I think a heads up that it is a needed change given we want to evolve and
Hadoop has stopped releasing < 2.7.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:31 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> How do we want to phrase the note to user@hbase? as a heads-up that
> this is a needed change due to the
Josh,
Thank you. The RPCServer.getRemoteIp() is what I was looking for.
Best,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 6:46 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Xu,
>
> Can you be more specific about what you're asking for in a "clientID" or
> "clientName"?
>
> Or even better, look at the static methods
Ted Yu created HBASE-20495:
--
Summary: REST unit test fails with NoClassDefFoundError against
hadoop3
Key: HBASE-20495
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20495
Project: HBase
Issue
How do we want to phrase the note to user@hbase? as a heads-up that
this is a needed change due to the practicalities of having Hadoop as
a dependency? or as something we're looking for feedback on from the
user community before we declare consensus reached?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Josh
Xu,
Can you be more specific about what you're asking for in a "clientID" or
"clientName"?
Or even better, look at the static methods on the class
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer. There are a number of getters
which use ThreadLocal variables to provide context about the user who
+1 no objections here.
On 4/24/18 11:37 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
Let's consider branching for HBase 1.5.
The new feature justifying a minor increment is storage class aware
placement (HBASE-19858), and a required update in Hadoop minimum version.
It would be marked experimental. However,
+1 (non-binding)
Checksum, signature: ok
Rat check: ok
Build from source (8_163): ok
Start from bin in pseudo distributed mode w/ HDFS: ok
LTT 1M rows: ok
Simple shell commands: ok
Test RSGroup: ok
Web UI: ok
REST server: ok
NOTE: Using the new JDK (8_171) TestSaslFanOutOneBlockAsyncDFSOutput
+1 to change its vote from -1 to -0. It is a little noisy now.
On 2018/04/25 14:28:24, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Given how often I see us ignoring ruby-lint feedback in precommit,
> would anyone be opposed to me changing its vote from -1 to -0?
>
> If someone
15 matches
Mail list logo