Splitting table by column family

Hey guys, I have one question regarding splitting the table to regions which I couldn't find the complete answer for. So I found in the various sources that the region split divides the table by the rowkey, and that the single row is always guaranteed to be contained within the single region.

Re: Splitting table by column family

. Where did you get such information ? On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, I have one question regarding splitting the table to regions which I couldn't find the complete answer for. So I found in the various sources that the region

Re: Splitting table by column family

I see - thank you! -Mikhail 2014-03-18 13:16 GMT-07:00 Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com: bq. single row is always located in the one region Yes. On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the quick reply, Ted! I believe I saw

Re: Bringing consensus based strong consistency into HBase

to send around a short document written by Mikhail Antonov that is trying to clarify a couple of points about this whole effort. People are asking me about this off-line, so I decided to send this around so we can have a lively and wider discussion about this initiative

Re: Bringing consensus based strong consistency into HBase

attached to HBASE-10909 for reference and comments. Thanks, Mikhail 2014-04-09 16:33 GMT-07:00 Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com: Guys, as was advised, I moved the PDF document to umbrella jira, here - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10909. Thanks, Mikhail 2014-04-08 8:34 GMT

Re: Bringing consensus based strong consistency into HBase

at 9:29 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, attached is a reworked version of this document which includes: - starting fresh approach to consensus operations in HBase - benefits it could bring - code pointers and list of modifications required to abstract

Re: Bringing consensus based strong consistency into HBase

forgotten. Thanks! Mikhail 2014-04-18 10:49 GMT-07:00 Stack st...@duboce.net: The doc helps Mikhail. Its a fun read. Thanks. St.Ack On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, attached is a reworked version of this document which includes

Re: The builds.apache.org grind

My 2 cents.. should the test runners have profiles like ASF build vs EC2 large m/c or something, from which the appropriate timeouts are derived, and for ASF timeouts are longer than for custom envs? Or that would make the whole test infra less trustworthy? -Mikhail 2014-04-25 15:47 GMT-07:00

Re: Service Temporarily Unavailable for https://builds.apache.org/?

Please wait while Jenkins is getting ready to work Looks like some jenkins maintenance is going on? Mikhail 2014-05-20 18:15 GMT-07:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari jean-m...@spaggiari.org: Is it just me? -- Thanks, Michael Antonov

Re: In regard to HBase concurrent request

How much data did you retrieve with single Get? if it's pretty small, you could try increasing this param. See 2.5.2.3 in http://hbase.apache.org/book/important_configurations.html 2014-05-20 20:21 GMT-07:00 Tahseen Jamal tahseen.ja...@gmail.com: Yes, have use the method you mentioned And

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

On ZK abstraction... What date tentatively we're talking as a release date for 1.0.0? I think Enis is right that technically as long as we're just changing private interfaces, we can do part in one release and the rest in subsequent one, yet also I agree with Andrew that having ZK

Re: Thinking of branching for 1.0 by June 23

I think jiras on ZK abstraction can still get committed (I'll make sure to have all non-trivial patches posted on RB for discussion to make sure we don't accidentally introduce any instability). On jiras. Under HBASE-10909: - HBASE-11069 (region merge transaction) is close to completion, just

Re: [VOTE] Merge branch HBASE-10070 to trunk

So how would the defaults and dependencies look amongst these 3, once committed to 0.99? - co-location of meta and master - zk-less assignment - timeline-consistent replicas? As I understand - - All 3 are off by default - zk-less assignments and region replicas to not be turned on at the

Re: [VOTE] Merge branch HBASE-10070 to trunk

a configuration check for the above ? On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: So how would the defaults and dependencies look amongst these 3, once committed to 0.99? - co-location of meta and master - zk-less assignment - timeline-consistent

Findbug warning reports on ASF jenkins

Guys, could someone please suggest me where findbug reports are kept on jenkins boxes? The links posted by hadoop-qa bot seems to be broken (like this one - https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9840//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html), and if I

Re: Findbug warning reports on ASF jenkins

-DskipTests Then look for findbugsXml.xml under target directory of respective module. Cheers On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, could someone please suggest me where findbug reports are kept on jenkins boxes? The links posted

Re: Findbug warning reports on ASF jenkins

the findbugsXml.xml with and without your patch. Cheers On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Ted. I was actually looking for the way to see the list of new warnings specifically (ones reported as introduced by the patch being tested

Re: Planning to roll the 0.98.4 RC on 6/30

Andrew, Could you share some details - on what env. you're running the tests, and at which point do that fail? I'm curious because of lately I'm seeing weird failures on current master too, which do not happen on hadoop-qa - individual tests always pass, but when running the suite tests either

Re: hadoopqa

Thanks Stack - so, for now hadoopqa bot is going to be operational with JDK 8, or it's dead still? -Mikhail 2014-06-30 0:01 GMT-07:00 Stack st...@duboce.net: The explicit use of a jdk1.7ism in master branch exposes the fact that we've been building master w/ 1.6 all along though jenkins UI

Re: hadoopQA links to findbugs warning broken

I've seen the same before and followed Ted's suggestion above on how to see findbug warnings. Though unless I'm missing something, running maven findbugs:findbugs command will show all warnings for the module, not specifically the ones which appear to be introduced by the patch being tested.

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

...@cloudera.com: For ZK-less assignment, I prefer it to go in before 1.0. It's backward compatible and rolling-upgradable. I am doing more testing now. Thanks, Jimmy On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: On ZK abstraction... What date

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

Stack st...@duboce.net: On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, getting back to ZK abstraction work w.r.t. release 1.0 and thereafter, some status update. So as we're getting closer to complete HBASE-10909, it looks like the steps may

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

: On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Moved ZK watcher listener subtask out of scope HBASE-10909. Enis - with that, I guess HBASE-10909 can be marked in branch-1? Sounds good. HBASE-11464 - this is the jira where I'll capture tasks to abstract

Re: Meetup invitation: Consensus based replication in Hadoop

We have changed the audio channel so you should be able to hear better now. As for the video: please use gotomeeting URL posted in the dev mailing list -Sent from mobile, please excuse typos Mikhail On Jul 15, 2014, at 12:41, sanjay Radia san...@hortonworks.com wrote: I am at the meeting

Re: what label is used for issues that are good on ramps for new contributors?

Could a non-native English speaker comment on if either makes more sense (or if something else would be better still)? beginner or for_beginners would be good IMO. -Mikhail 2014-08-05 8:43 GMT-07:00 Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com: The labels introductory or intro seem the most

Re: Jenkins jobs leave junk around

I assume that as a quick-fix solution it's safe to kill those processes in the post-build jenkins steps. -Mikhail 2014-08-12 18:00 GMT-07:00, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com: Apache Jenkins sets surefire.secondPartThreadCount at 2 - so your build should take shorter than Apache trunk build.

Re: HBASE-11699 - Adding additional data to meta table.

I'm also interested in this topic in light of HBASE-7767. So i'm wondering if there's write-up description about new reserved tables, may be should be somewhere here - http://hbase.apache.org/book/arch.catalog.html? -Mikhail 2014-08-12 18:36 GMT-07:00 Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com: We

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New HBase PMC members: Matteo Bertozzi, Nick Dimiduk, and Jeffrey Zhong

Congratulations guys! -Mikhail 2014-08-25 17:32 GMT-07:00 Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com: Congrats to Matteo, Nick and Jeffrey ! On Aug 25, 2014, at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote: On behalf of the Apache HBase PMC, I am happy to belatedly announce and welcome Matteo

Re: Ruby scripting in HBase?

JM - do you mean writing unit or integration tests for groovy commands themselves, or to be able to write HBase tests in Groovy? If later one, then I'd think HBase tests may benefit a lot in conciseness if written in Groovy. -Mikhail 2014-08-28 16:39 GMT-07:00, Jean-Marc Spaggiari

Re: How to start contribution in HBase

Hi Sanjiv, http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#developer is a good start, it has information on how to build hbase form source, describes test harness structure and how to run the tests, and the procedure on how to format and submit patches for review. Also, there a label in Apache jira called

Re: Dev meetup on Sept 10th

Thanks Ryan. It seems that it would make sense to reschedule this dev meetup for some time later in Sep or so (so we could compile more rich and coherent agenda, and also try to help scaling cluster effort), and probably do it in the dev hackathon format. Sorry for possible inconvenience.

Re: Toward the Incomplete 1K

Hi Andrew, this filter says: The requested filter doesn't exist or is private.. Could you check if it's shared? Thanks! Mikhail On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: Happy holidays. We currently have 2,117 incomplete JIRA issues. When you've returned

Re: Please welcome our latest committer, the mighty Liu Shaohui!

Congrats Liu! -Mikhail On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Talat Uyarer ta...@uyarer.com wrote: Congratulations Lui. On Jan 7, 2015 6:07 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Liu Shaohui has been debugging and fixing ugly production issues for a long time now contributing back his quality fixes. We

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sean Busbey joins the Apache HBase PMC

Congrats, Sean! -Mikhail On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Esteban Gutierrez este...@cloudera.com wrote: Congratulations Sean! -- Cloudera, Inc. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:49 PM, lars hofhansl lhofha...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Yeah! :) From: Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org

Re: Please welcome new HBase committer Jing Chen (Jerry) He

Congrats Jerry! -Mikhail On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Pankaj kr pankaj...@huawei.com wrote: Congrats Jerry..!! :) -Original Message- From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:apurt...@apache.org] Sent: 02 April 2015 01:53 To: dev@hbase.apache.org; u...@hbase.apache.org Subject: Please

Re: Please welcome new HBase committer Srikanth Srungarapu

Congratulations Srikanth! -Mikhail On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Pankaj kr pankaj...@huawei.com wrote: Congrats Srikanth..!! -Original Message- From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:apurt...@apache.org] Sent: 02 April 2015 01:53 To: dev@hbase.apache.org; u...@hbase.apache.org Subject:

Re: Spinning up for 1.1 Release

Let me get HBASE-13452, as I spent some time looking at this code before. -M On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Nick Dimiduk ndimi...@apache.org wrote: All, We're now just **two days away** from my proposed RC date! That means we're very close to pencils down on new features for 1.1. I

Re: JIRA reply threading

I can't really say why existing responses aren't threaded if you aren't logged in, it doesn't need session information. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote: Not present if you aren't logged in, also existing responses not threaded if you aren't logged in, I

Re: Removal of deprecated features

Right, that's my perception on that too. -Mikhail On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Nick Dimiduk ndimi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Semver states that MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes. I read it literally

Re: Splitting table from HBase shell using script

Sergey, that might by a bit of off-topic, but in HBASE-13103 there's a discussion on how to relieve folks of having to think of proper ways of running their split commands. As it's now in design prototyping stage, any feedback from production users is greatly appreciated! -Mikhail On Fri, Apr

Hadoop-qa bot sometimes doesn't notice patches?

Hey guys, I think hadoop-qa used to pick up and run the last attached patch when you click cancel/submit patch. Lately I've noticed that (sometimes?) doesn't work - you'd need to re-attach the same file first and then click cancel/submit. Anyone else observed that? Is it some kind of

Re: Hadoop-qa bot sometimes doesn't notice patches?

:647) at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.retrieveChanges(GitSCM.java:889) FYI On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, I think hadoop-qa used to pick up and run the last attached patch when you click cancel/submit patch. Lately I've noticed

Re: Removal of deprecated features

I'm probably late to this thread, but just given some comments to HBASE-13395 wanted to follow up here. Semver states that MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes. I read it literally as in 2.0 you can remove anything compared to 1.0. Realistically, that probably means we can at

Re: Hadoop-qa bot sometimes doesn't notice patches?

...@cloudera.com wrote: You can check the Jenkins log to be sure, but the patch tester has a check now that short-circuit aborts test runs when it has already seen a specific JIRA attachment. -- Sean On Apr 8, 2015 11:32 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Hm, I see, that's interesting

PreCommit-HBASE-Build has some issues?

Jenkins shows several builds which started 5-7 hours ago and still running. Are there any issues with build boxes or..? -Mikhail

Re: PreCommit-HBASE-Build has some issues?

Thanks! On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: I was wondering... Let me kill them Mikhail. St.Ack On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: Jenkins shows several builds which started 5-7 hours ago and still running. Are there any

Re: Semantic Versioning Worksheet

? -Mikhail On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: In branch-1.0 HTable is {Private, Stable} with comment - * pHTable is no longer a client API. Use {@link Table} instead. It is marked * InterfaceAudience.Private indicating that this is an HBase-internal class

Re: Semantic Versioning Worksheet

In branch-1.0 HTable is {Private, Stable} with comment - * pHTable is no longer a client API. Use {@link Table} instead. It is marked * InterfaceAudience.Private indicating that this is an HBase-internal class as defined in * a

Re: JDK8 for master

+1 On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Nick Dimiduk ndimi...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote: Hey Folks, I know we've talked before about going Java 8 for master[1], but it's been on my mind again lately[2]. I'm in the process of

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New HBase committer Esteban Gutierrez

Congratulations Esteban!! -Mikhail On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Nick Dimiduk ndimi...@gmail.com wrote: Congratulations Esteban! On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Nicolas Liochon nkey...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome aboard, Esteban. On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Pankaj kr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New HBase committer Mikhail Antonov

PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote: Good stuff Mikhail! On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: On behalf of the Apache HBase PMC, I am pleased to announce that Mikhail Antonov has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer

Re: Semantic Versioning Worksheet

to faster absorb users' feedback on experimental things? -Mikhail On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Mikhail Antonov olorinb...@gmail.com wrote: In branch-1.0 HTable is {Private, Stable} with comment - * pHTable is no longer a client

Re: does hbase:meta splits?

Meta table does not split currently, although this topic does come up every once in a while. You may want to look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11165 - there's discussion on that topic you may find useful and interesting https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12016 - this

Re: Please welcome new HBase committer Stephen Yuan Jiang

Congrats Stephen! -Mikhail On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote: Yay! On Thursday, August 20, 2015, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: On behalf of the Apache HBase PMC, I am pleased to announce that Stephen Jiang has accepted the PMC's invitation

Re: [DISCUSSION] Switching from RTC to CTR

Just curious, I assume if this change is made, would it only apply to master branch? -Mikhail On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Andrew Purtell andrew.purt...@gmail.com wrote: @dev is now CCed I didn't want to over structure the discussion with too much detail up front. I do think CTR without

Re: DISCUSSION: lets do a developer workshop on near-term work

I'd definitely join if I'm in SFBA at the time it all takes place (will be out of country from 1st to 20th of August). I'm like to chat about several topics under scaling to 1M regions umbrella which are either in progress, or in investigation phase, or in review, as well as 2.0 proposed

Re: Proposal: Matteo for 2.0.0 RM

+1 for Matteo (non-binding) On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Enis Söztutar e...@apache.org wrote: +1. Enis On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Elliott Clark ecl...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Folks good with that? +1 for Matteo for

Re: Any interest in a meetup in October?

I'm tentatively in. -Mikhail On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Vladimir Rodionov wrote: > Free beer is always good :) > > -Vlad > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > >> It's been a while since we've had a dev/user meetup. I've

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving the HBase site to use a stand-alone git repo

Sounds good to me. On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > No concerns here. > > > On Dec 2, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > > Hi Folks! > > > > You may recall the occasional emails dev@ gets from a Jenkins job Misty >

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

Checked signatures, package content, RAT, ran tests, notice repeated failure: tests in error: TestRegionServerHostname.testRegionServerHostname:86 » TestTimedOut test timed... It failed once as part of suite, and now failing for me in individual runs around every 3rd run (MacOSX). Anyone else

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

+1 to include patches which improve region normalization. Since it's new functionality for 1.2, should be low risk (no regressions). -Mikhail On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Please also consider including HBASE-15073 in the next RC. > > This JIRA gives

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

You're right, sorry. On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Folks, please comment on the relevant jiras and not on the VOTE thread. > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1

Re: identifying source of region split request

Adding this tracing information to know who initiated split is in general useful thing. Right now though I'm not sure I see how that would help to make better normalization decisions? Region split failure implies underlying FS issue? Any examples/ideas? Kind of..collect statistics to blacklist

Re: identifying source of region split request

so help normalizer avoid the following > scenario: > > region R gets split into R1 and R2 > size of R1 and R2 decreases due to expiration of data > R1 and R2 get merged into R' > more data comes into R', resulting in split, again > > Cheers > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10

Re: DISCUSS: Meaning of "not tested" and "not supported"

I think not supported doesn't necessarily mean we don't intend HBase to be used this way, could also mean we just haven't implemented certain feature yet. Like, streaming RPC isn't supported, but may very well be the way to go in future. I'd rather say something like - "Not supported" == "we

Re: [DISCUSS] Include Deb and RPM packages in releases

"It might be more useful to produce a script that, given a set of versions for { Hadoop, HBase, ZK } downloads the respective tarballs and stitches together a HBase deployment tarball with all necessary jar substitutions made, and perhaps the copy of Hadoop native library artifacts into the

Re: Branch for 1.3

and have less versions to test. How many people want to stick with Hadoop 2.4 yet upgrade to HBase 1.3? -Mikhail On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > &g

Re: Branch for 1.3

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I'm thinking to move Hadoop 2.4.* from Supported to Not Tested, to kind > of > > encourag

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Mikhail Antonov joins the Apache HBase PMC

Thanks guys! -Mikhail On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nice work Mikhail! Congrats. > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > On behalf of the Apache HBase PMC I am

Re: Branch for 1.3

gt; Mikhail, I suggest that we create the branch-1.3 now so that you can > > control what goes in and what not. branch-1 is free for all usually. > > > > Enis > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >

Re: Branch for 1.3

, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, branch-1.3 was cut some time ago and for a while most of commits > going to branch-1 would also go to it, but last few days > I'm trying to let only the following things go in: > > - criticals and blockers > - test

Flaky tests

A while ago we ran an effort to crack down on broken/flaky tests on branch-1, and I guess some of the branch builds are again in a sorry state, so writing here to raise awareness (kind of). As I'm looking at https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.3 and https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.4

Re: Surge of flaky tests

I suspected this failure was caused by me reverting the split/merge switch-related locks, but couldn't reproduce it locally. Let me look again too. -Mikhail On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > From the list, some tests, such as the following (reproduced

Re: Branch for 1.3

r" or "Critical" let's target it for 1.3.1 and / or 1.4. Thanks! Mikhail On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not aware of any, and changes made to 1.3 shouldn't render 2.4 > unsupportable. > > On the second th

Re: Git / SSL issues on ASF builds?

n an INFRA JIRA (unless you’d like to, Mikhail). > > -Dima > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Mikhail Antonov <anto...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Just saw that on several 1.4 builds - > > > > Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException

Re: Git / SSL issues on ASF builds?

hu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Dima Spivak <dspi...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > Opened INFRA-12166 to see if ASF Infra can do something to certs on this > > slave or if we’ll just need to have someone go into all our jobs and > > exclude building on it manually. > > &

Git / SSL issues on ASF builds?

Just saw that on several 1.4 builds - Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException : Command "/opt/csw/bin/git -c core.askpass=true fetch --tags --progress https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase.git

Re: [DISCUSS] Dynamic switches in master

Looked through the comments and glanced at the patch. I generally think that the patch addressing specific existing problem shouldn't be blocked on generic big feature like dynamic configuration framework, so would be good to get something committable sooner rather then latter. It seems the only

Re: Branch for 1.3

1.3 >> > > release, instead of spending effort on 1.4 release, the community >> should >> > > focus on stabilizing master (or branch-2, not exist as of now) branch >> and >> > > make 2.0 release a priority. 2.0 release would bring more values to &

Re: Branch for 1.3

To me it's not really about individual big features (besides, big features might be hard to accommodate in a minor release), but enough good things to justify minor release. What we can have (unless I'm missing something): [Already done or to be further improved] - HBASE-15177 - more

Re: Branch for 1.3

Yeah, I meant HBASE-13909 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13909> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > bq. 1.2 was cut off mid-June 2015 > > 1.2.0 was released recently. > Did you mean another release ? > > On Thu, Feb

Re: Branch for 1.3

se. > > > > > > > > HBASE-15181 is almost ready to go. > > > > > > > > What do you guys think about MOB in branch-1, and possibly in 1.3. > > There > > > > was a separate thread some time ago, don't remember the conclusion > > ther

Re: Branch for 1.3

Agreed. I just meant - readiness of 2.0 is something affecting decisions on whether or not to backport mobs to branch-1 (which is itself separate thread). -Mikhail On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Mikhai

Re: Branch for 1.3

. > > > > Matteo > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Agreed. I just meant - readiness of 2.0 is something affecting > decisions > > on > > > whether or not to ba

Re: [DISCUSS] Re: Branch for 1.3

Updating to the next minor release is supposed to be pretty straightforward and low-risky, so I don't think I see justification/value to maintain them for long time. (if there's no RM for 1.3 yet I can volunteer to) On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > bq.

Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting Regionserver Groups (HBASE-6721) to 1.x and 0.98

>>>"Why MOB and RegionServer Groups should be in a new major version and stuff like the new RPC queue (HBASE-15136), date based tiered compactions (HBASE-15181), special handling for system tables WALs (HBASE-13557), keep table state in meta (HBASE-13017) or the Region Normalizer (HBASE-13103) are

Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8

+1 -Mikhail On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Esteban Gutierrez wrote: > +1 > > -- > Cloudera, Inc. > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thursday, April 7, 2016, Stack wrote: > > > > > Any

Re: Please welcome new HBase Committer Francis Liu

Congratulations Francis! -Mikhail On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Esteban Gutierrez wrote: > Welcome Francis! and well deserved! > > -- > Cloudera, Inc. > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > Congratulations and

Re: Please welcome new HBase committer Ashish Singhi

Congratulations Ashish! -Mikhail On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Esteban Gutierrez wrote: > Great work, Ashish! Welcome! > > -- > Cloudera, Inc. > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > > Thanks for all the contributions Ashish!

Re: [DISCUSS] Any objection to saying HBase 1.2.0 is not supported on versions < hadoop-2.4.x?

+1 -Mikhail On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > I'm good with it, though I'll also ask the question if there's anything > goofy to be aware of re: HBase as someone upgrades their Hadoop? Probably > nothing, but I've been surprised before; would be good to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New HBase committer Yu Li

Congratulations Yu Li! -Mikhail On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Jerry He wrote: > Congrats Yu Li! Welcome! > > Jerry > > On Thursday, March 17, 2016, Victor Xu wrote: > > > Congratulations, Yu Li (Jueding)! > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:51

Re: Branch for 1.3

get a stable minor release out. From this, I have my own 2-cents > on > >>> 1.4 > >>>> release. The plan is to have 2.0 release during summer time of this > >> year > >>>> (yeah, *this year). * Given the limited time and resource, after 1.3 > >

Re: Branch for 1.3

umbers > > are handled in comparison. > > > > FYI > > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > bringing this topic up again. I'm planning to star

Re: Testing and CI -- Apache Jenkins Builds (WAS -> Re: Testing)

Cutting 1.5 hours off pre-commit build's time would be great. Would post-commit builds also only run on jdk7 or both? Mikhail On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > Running against jdk 7 only is fine by me. > > > On Mar 7, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Sean Busbey

Re: /bin/ls permission issue on precommit tests

"If the Yetus PMC is aware of regular use of our project in non-released form we need to take action to stop it." I'm not sure I understand that part though - is that specific to Yetus, or is it something ASF-level? Let's take Hadoop as an example. I could build it from trunk's HEAD once a week

Re: Branch for 1.3

; we already had the branch-1 conversation. the specific gates were tracked > in the umbrella jira. > > -Sean > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Yeah, we probably should start discussion thread about Spark co

Re: Allowing clients to set priorities

; >> heavy reduces), processing pipeline, random reads, etc. There are > > >> features already to de-prioritize long running scanners and there is > > >> rpc throttling and we can split up the handlers into read, write. > > >> Currently there is no e

Re: Branch for 1.3

> Thanks Mikhail for the heads up. > > Regards > Ram > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Mikhail Antonov <anto...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Ok, I think it's time to bring up this thread again. Let's see where we > > are. > > > > So, outsta

Re: Branch for 1.3

Thanks! -Mikhail On 4/27/16, ramkrishna vasudevan <ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote: > I saw Andy's comment. Will create a patch for trunk also and will commit > both together. > > Regards > Ram > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Mikhail Antonov &

Re: Branch for 1.3

> > Let us know the JIRA numbers. > I can help with reviewing if needed. > > Cheers > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Last time I've tried to run 1.3 builds there were issues with balancer, > > which are

  1   2   3   >