This merge vote passes with 4 binding +1's and 3 non-binding +1's.
Thanks everyone. I'll go ahead with the merge into master and see how
easily it comes back to branch-2.
On 2021/12/16 21:30:09 Josh Elser wrote:
Hi!
I'm extremely pleased to send this official vote to merge the feature
Duo -- yes, you are correct, but I wanted to give the opportunity for
others who didn't work on it (and thus, have an interest in seeing it
merged) to also vote :). I plan to merge this into master given the
current response from the other devs.
Andrew -- I feel that very well. Thanks for taking
+1 (binding)
Really happy to see this. Apologies that I have so limited bandwidth these
days.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 10:54 AM Josh Elser wrote:
> Thanks to all who took the time to vote already!
>
> So far, we have 5 +1's (2 binding, 3 non-binding) which is sufficient
> for a lazy-consensus
IIRC for merging a feature branch back, 3 committers' +1 is enough?
Peter Somogyi 于2021年12月21日周二 04:07写道：
> +1
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 7:54 PM Josh Elser wrote:
>
> > Thanks to all who took the time to vote already!
> >
> > So far, we have 5 +1's (2 binding, 3 non-binding) which is
+1
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 7:54 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> Thanks to all who took the time to vote already!
>
> So far, we have 5 +1's (2 binding, 3 non-binding) which is sufficient
> for a lazy-consensus RESULT. However, I'd love to see a vote from
> someone who didn't contribute code to this
Thanks to all who took the time to vote already!
So far, we have 5 +1's (2 binding, 3 non-binding) which is sufficient
for a lazy-consensus RESULT. However, I'd love to see a vote from
someone who didn't contribute code to this feature. I know running an
in-depth technical analysis is a major
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Pankaj
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021, 2:35 AM Josh Elser wrote:
> I guess I forgot to vote :)
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 12/17/21 8:57 AM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> > Big +1 from me.
> >
> > This is a big step for making HBase more cloud native.
> >
> > I've already rebased
I guess I forgot to vote :)
+1 (binding)
On 12/17/21 8:57 AM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
Big +1 from me.
This is a big step for making HBase more cloud native.
I've already rebased HBASE-26067 to the latest master.
Thanks~
Ankit Singhal 于2021年12月17日周五 07:17写道：
+1
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:53
Big +1 from me.
This is a big step for making HBase more cloud native.
I've already rebased HBASE-26067 to the latest master.
Thanks~
Ankit Singhal 于2021年12月17日周五 07:17写道：
> +1
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:53 PM Andor Molnar wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Andor
> >
> >
> >
> > > On
+1
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:53 PM Andor Molnar wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Andor
>
>
>
> > On 2021. Dec 16., at 22:30, Josh Elser wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm extremely pleased to send this official vote to merge the feature
> branch for HBASE-26067[1] into master and backport into
+1 (non-binding)
Andor
> On 2021. Dec 16., at 22:30, Josh Elser wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm extremely pleased to send this official vote to merge the feature branch
> for HBASE-26067[1] into master and backport into branch-2 (2.x, not 2.5.x).
> This feature branch introduces the pluggable
Hi!
I'm extremely pleased to send this official vote to merge the feature
branch for HBASE-26067[1] into master and backport into branch-2 (2.x,
not 2.5.x). This feature branch introduces the pluggable
StoreFileTracker interface.
The StoreFileTracker allows the StoreFileEngine to be
12 matches
Mail list logo
