See HBASE-20027
New RC coming after fix and test coverage improvement.
--
Best regards,
Andrew
Actually, wow, it doesn't seem like it's picking up site file config?
Didn't appear to work for me just now when I tried it. We are not catching
this in tests because there appears to be no positive test for port
assignment and the only fixed information we require is the zookeeper
quorum and
I did a few test launches just now. Port assignment is random in the
ephemeral range unless specified in site file. Is this unexpected? An
unintended consequence of a fix made for unit testing perhaps? I did a
quick check of recent commits and suspect if changed it happened before we
released
+1 (but one question on bottom)
Checked hash and signature.
Built tgz from src download and ran it.
Poked around. Looks good.
Loaded data. Verified it present.
Shutdown. Logs looked good.
Question: For some reason my master port was homed on 63502... anyone else
have this issue? I didn't spend
+1 (non-binding)
Checked signature, sums
Rat check
Web UI: split, merge tables
Shell basic functionalities
LTT 1M rows
Build with full test suite
PE 1M rows
Basic operations from java client
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> The first HBase 1.4.2
Yep, Hadoop's MiniKDC has a dependency on a valid kerberos environment.
Please feel free to file a JIRA about this, but as the MiniKDC is not our
component, I'm not sure there is much we can do. You may need to install
some OS kerberos package into that Docker image.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 6:20
> java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to parse:includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/
This looks like something wrong with the test environment.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Artem Ervits wrote:
> on second thought -1
>
> I can reproduce the test failure below in hbase-server
>
+1 (non-binding)
Hadoop 2.7.5 pseudo-distributed
Binary Release MD5: OK
HBase 1.4.1 rolling upgrade to 1.4.2 - OK
hbase shell: put, scan, get, list, count, create snapshot, restore
snapshot, disable, drop, list_regions - OK
LTT 1M rows: OK
PE 1k rows: OK
JDK: 1.8.0.161
SRC MD5: OK
compile with
> It will be a month until 1.4.3. Can this wait? Sounds bad but we already have
> two releases out there where this didn't come up? Maybe nobody is making use
> of BufferedMutator and 1.4 yet?
Got it. Let us concentrate on 1.4.2 rc.
On 2018/02/18 19:10:16, Andrew Purtell
It will be a month until 1.4.3. Can this wait? Sounds bad but we already have
two releases out there where this didn't come up? Maybe nobody is making use of
BufferedMutator and 1.4 yet?
If you would like to veto this RC for this reason that's no problem, in which
case I will pick up the
hi Andrew,
Could we add HBASE-20017 to 1.4.2? The issue is related to data lose.
On 2018/02/16 21:46:17, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> The first HBase 1.4.2 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.2RC0/ and
The first HBase 1.4.2 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.2RC0/ and Maven
artifacts are available in the temporary repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1195/ .
The git tag corresponding
12 matches
Mail list logo