I think we already have consensus from prior discussion, but it doesn't hurt to
raise it again.
> On Aug 10, 2018, at 9:28 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> Move the stable pointer now? Should I open a new discussion thread?
> Thanks,
> S
>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:59 AM Andrew Purtell wrote:
>>
Move the stable pointer now? Should I open a new discussion thread?
Thanks,
S
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:59 AM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Including my +1 we have three binding +1s, three non-binding +1s, and no 0
> or -1 votes. The vote passes.
>
> Finishing the release.
>
> My thanks to all who
Including my +1 we have three binding +1s, three non-binding +1s, and no 0
or -1 votes. The vote passes.
Finishing the release.
My thanks to all who voted on the release candidate!
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:39 PM Ankit Singhal
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> -- Build from src - Ok
> --
+1 (non-binding)
-- Build from src - Ok
-- Started a cluster and ran selected Integration test- Ok
-- Basic shell commands - Ok
-- Ran rat check - Ok
-- SHA and Signatures - Ok
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> Ok. For TestExportSnapshot please post the full test
Ok. For TestExportSnapshot please post the full test output from the failed
runs to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20982.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:17 PM Yu Li wrote:
> The same observation on TestExportSnapshot as noted.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> On 31 July 2018 at 03:14, Andrew
The same observation on TestExportSnapshot as noted.
Best Regards,
Yu
On 31 July 2018 at 03:14, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > TestExportSnapshot and TestRegionServerHostname failed/timed-out,
> respectively
>
> Thanks, they didn't fail for me but let me add these to the list of flakes
> to follow
+1 (binding)
Checked sums and signatures: ok
Built from source: ok (7u79)
RAT check: ok (7u79)
Unit tests pass: ok (7u79)
- Note: TestExportSnapshot and TestSecureExportSnapshot keeps failing in my
local env
- I'd suggest to backport HBASE-16634/16671/17970 (rough check, no enough
time to dig
> TestExportSnapshot and TestRegionServerHostname failed/timed-out,
respectively
Thanks, they didn't fail for me but let me add these to the list of flakes
to follow up on.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:12 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * xsums/sigs good
> * UTs mostly good
+1 (binding)
* xsums/sigs good
* UTs mostly good (TestExportSnapshot and TestRegionServerHostname
failed/timed-out, respectively)
* Src release is just source only
Sorry for the delay -- got held up re-running UTs after my /etc/hosts
was busted :)
On 7/25/18 2:35 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
+1
- signatures, shasum: OK
- rat check: OK
- built from source (8u122): OK
- unit tests: OK
- web UI: OK
- basic shell operations: OK
- LTT with 1M rows: OK
Best regards,
Balazs
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:46 AM Peter Somogyi wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Signatures, checksums correct
> RAT
+1 (non-binding)
Signatures, checksums correct
RAT check passed (8u171)
Unit tests passed (8u171)
LTT 1M rows passed
Web UI looks correct
Simple shell commands work
Thanks for the release,
Peter
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:36 PM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> The first HBase 1.4.6 release candidate
Gentle reminder I would like to close this vote tomorrow.
Technically the voting period is open ended and no need to close it until
enough affirmative votes have arrived, but after this week I will be out
for a week or so, so I ask the PMC to kindly vote on this RC this week.
Given all the
In the thread "[DISCUSS] our stable release pointer and EOM"
I think we agreed to move the stable pointer to point at 1.4 but didn't
specify when. In another thread I read mention of 1.4.4 being the target,
but couldn't find the supporting discussion. 1.4.5 is a security fix
release so it should
Is this intended to be a new stable pointer or not yet?
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> T
> hey should be there now, sorry about that.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:21 AM Josh Elser wrote:
>
> > Hey Andrew,
> >
> > Looks like the sigs are missing from your
T
hey should be there now, sorry about that.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:21 AM Josh Elser wrote:
> Hey Andrew,
>
> Looks like the sigs are missing from your staged RC. Could you add those
> please?
>
> On 7/25/18 2:35 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > The first HBase 1.4.6 release candidate (RC0)
Hey Andrew,
Looks like the sigs are missing from your staged RC. Could you add those
please?
On 7/25/18 2:35 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
The first HBase 1.4.6 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.6RC0/ and Maven
artifacts
The first HBase 1.4.6 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.6RC0/ and Maven
artifacts are available in the temporary repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1226/ .
The git tag corresponding
17 matches
Mail list logo
