Re: [RESULT][VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

Thanks for this really heavy lift as RM, Stack. Simple thanks doesn't do it justice really, the scope of this release has been super demanding, but you have them nonetheless. On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Stack wrote: > With 4 non-binding +1s, 4 binding +1s, two -0s, and a

[RESULT][VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

With 4 non-binding +1s, 4 binding +1s, two -0s, and a +0, the vote passes. We branched hbase-2 four years ago. Our first 2.0.0 alpha was almost a year ago. Though there are perf issues still (see reports on HBASE-20483, currently, actively been worked-on) and some interesting late arrivals

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

+1 S On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Stack wrote: > The third release candidate for Apache HBase 2.0.0 is available for > downloading and testing. > > Artifacts are available here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0RC2/ > > Maven artifacts are

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:06 PM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > For master and branch-2 it will break serial replication feature, on > branch-2.0, I do not think it will cause over-play but it may cause > something wrong with region locating(not sure, no evidence), as we use the >

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

Stack, HBASE-20504 has been filed for this issue. Thanks. Sakthi On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Azhaku Sakthi Vel Muthu Krishnan < > jatsak...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > Stack, it works well for CentOS(7.2), Mac OS(10.13.3)

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

For master and branch-2 it will break serial replication feature, on branch-2.0, I do not think it will cause over-play but it may cause something wrong with region locating(not sure, no evidence), as we use the open sequence number to determine whether we should replace the cache. 2018-04-28

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Azhaku Sakthi Vel Muthu Krishnan < jatsak...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Stack, it works well for CentOS(7.2), Mac OS(10.13.3) & Ubuntu(16.04). It > showed up the same issue on another machine with CentOS(7.4 i.e. same as > before). So, my best guess, it's specific

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

Andrew, the java version was same while testing for Mac(10.13.3) & CentOS(7.4). It worked on the mac though. Sakthi On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > TestHeapSize failures are more likely JVM related. > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Stack

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

Stack, it works well for CentOS(7.2), Mac OS(10.13.3) & Ubuntu(16.04). It showed up the same issue on another machine with CentOS(7.4 i.e. same as before). So, my best guess, it's specific centos version(7.4) dependent? Sakthi *Sakthi* | Software Engineer t. (480) 335-3681 <00>

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

TestHeapSize failures are more likely JVM related. On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Azhaku Sakthi Vel Muthu Krishnan < > jatsak...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > +0 > > > > - signatures and checksums: OK > > - rat check: OK > > -

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Azhaku Sakthi Vel Muthu Krishnan < jatsak...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +0 > > - signatures and checksums: OK > - rat check: OK > - built from source (1.8.0_171): OK > - ran Unit Tests > > NOTE: > > The following 3 tests fail when Unit Tests are attempted on a CentOS

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

+0 - signatures and checksums: OK - rat check: OK - built from source (1.8.0_171): OK - ran Unit Tests NOTE: The following 3 tests fail when Unit Tests are attempted on a CentOS platform. TestHeapSize.testMutations:520 expected:<120> but was:<112> TestHeapSize.testNativeSizes:200 expected:<48>

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:54 AM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > -0 > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20476 > > There is a race between reportRegionTransition and regionServerReport which > could lead to openSeqNum go backwards. But the sequence id at RS side is >

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

-0 See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20476 There is a race between reportRegionTransition and regionServerReport which could lead to openSeqNum go backwards. But the sequence id at RS side is correct so I'm not sure whether it is worth to sink a RC. 2018-04-26 15:59 GMT+08:00

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

+1 (non-binding) Checksum, signature: ok Rat check: ok Build from source (8_163): ok Start from bin in pseudo distributed mode w/ HDFS: ok LTT 1M rows: ok Simple shell commands: ok Test RSGroup: ok Web UI: ok REST server: ok NOTE: Using the new JDK (8_171) TestSaslFanOutOneBlockAsyncDFSOutput

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

+1 Checked signatures : good Ran test suite with Java 8 : passed > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Andrew Purtell > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok > > Built from source: ok (8u152) > > RAT check passes: ok (8u152) > > LTT 1M rows 20% updates: ok

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

Thanks Lars. S On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 1:28 AM, Lars Francke wrote: > Thanks Stack. > > In that case I'm -0 on this RC. > I'd really like to either revert that patch or at least document the > deprecation so we can remove it in 3.0. The way it is now we can't remove >

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

Thanks Stack. In that case I'm -0 on this RC. I'd really like to either revert that patch or at least document the deprecation so we can remove it in 3.0. The way it is now we can't remove getTypeByte() in 3.0 because we'll need it for getType() which we can't change because it's not documented

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

+1 Checked sums and signatures: ok Built from source: ok (8u152) RAT check passes: ok (8u152) LTT 1M rows 20% updates: ok (8u152) ITBLL 100M rows: ok (8u152) On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Stack wrote: > The third release candidate for Apache HBase 2.0.0 is available for

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

+1 (binding) On 4/23/18 1:10 AM, Stack wrote: The third release candidate for Apache HBase 2.0.0 is available for downloading and testing. Artifacts are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0RC2/ Maven artifacts are available in the staging repository at:

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

+1 non-binding download src & bin tar ball - OK signatures & sums - OK build from source (openjdk version "1.8.0_151") - OK rat check- OK unit

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:25 AM, Lars Francke wrote: > Stack, > > I'm sure you'll want to slap me for bringing this up so late (I only found > it recently) but could you take a look at the recent discussions in < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19746>? > Is

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

+1 signature: pass. build: pass. PE (randomWrite/randomRead): pass. zkcli, wal, hfile, regionsplitter tools: pass. started Thrift server: pass. started REST server: pass. -- Cloudera, Inc. On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Balazs Meszaros < balazs.mesza...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 > > -

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

Hi all, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to send this mail as an answer to this thread but separate. It does not belong in this discussion. Cheers, Lars On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Lars Francke wrote: > Stack, > > I'm sure you'll want to slap me for bringing this up so

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

Stack, I'm sure you'll want to slap me for bringing this up so late (I only found it recently) but could you take a look at the recent discussions in < https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19746>? Is there any need for me to work on this or would it be too late to merge this change anyway?

Re: [VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

+1 - signatures and checksums: OK - rat check: OK - built from source (8u112): OK - basic shell functionalities: OK - web UI: OK - LTT with 1M rows: OK On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Stack wrote: > The third release candidate for Apache HBase 2.0.0 is available for >

[VOTE] The third release candidate for HBASE 2.0.0 (RC2) is available

The third release candidate for Apache HBase 2.0.0 is available for downloading and testing. Artifacts are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0RC2/ Maven artifacts are available in the staging repository at: