Re: 7/28/2020 Bi-Weekly OSS Heron Sync-up

- raise draft PR for removal of heron-admin - progress on making (python) CLIs more readable - clean up heron-executor - WIP: clean up heron-explorer - unvendor encountered python packages (pyobj, cloudpickle) -

Removal of heron-admin

Hi folks, I put up a draft PR for to purge heron-admin, as well as some points for why I'd like to see it gone. I'm thinking the PR would be a good place for thoughts on it. There's no rush for it, so I'm thinking I could leave the PR in

Re: 7/14/2020 Bi-Weekly OSS Heron Sync-up

Hi! - Python 3.6 upgrade merged - thanks to everyone who helped test it for merging! - slowly poking around to get kubernetes integration testing scripted for CI ~Oliver On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 00:15, Ning Wang wrote: > Hi~ >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Docker OS support

Sorry if I missed the rationale for Ubuntu 18.04 instead of 20.04, but would the latest LTS be a better choice? 18.04 was released before Debian 10, so that may be an argument for 20.04 re. compatibility if Debian 10 is the standard. There's already a 20.04 Dockerfile + I It looks like the

Re: Bazel Version Compatibility Concerns

me way. There are quite a few modules in Python: python API, > > cli, executor, tracker, UI, etc. > > > > It seems this is a blocker to the bazel upgrade? In that case maybe we > > should focus on python package first. Does any bazel has internal python > > pack

Re: Bazel Version Compatibility Concerns

t; knowledge is limited in this part of the project. I appreciate the > thoughts and ideas. Thanks Oliver. Let us know what you come up with. > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 1:34 PM Oliver Bristow > wrote: > > > Google's subpar may be an option as a replacement for .pex - I imagi

Re: Bazel Version Compatibility Concerns

Google's subpar may be an option as a replacement for .pex - I imagine it'd have better support in Bazel/generally. Has anyone got any thoughts on pex/subpar? I can ponder more and look up stuff next week On Sat, 8 Dec 2018, 12:57 Josh Fischer Hey All, > > I've spent little bit of time over the

Using Bazel 0.14.1+

Hey folks, #2932 updated the repo to use 0.14.1 - it would be good to update your local version to be that or greater. Without a newer version you may experience an issue relating to scala if you are using the current master, but the change

Re: Building error

2018 at 4:28 PM, Oliver Bristow < > oli...@oliverbristow.co.uk> > wrote: > > > There's an issue <https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_scala/issues/532> > on > > the remote repo for it, hopefully they'll fix their cert soon - it > expired > > 24 hour

Re: Building error

There's an issue on the remote repo for it, hopefully they'll fix their cert soon - it expired 24 hours ago. Longer term may be for them to get that archive on and from GitHub On 24 June 2018 at 00:13, Ning Wang wrote: > It seems bazel