[STATUS] (flood) Wed Feb 27 23:45:33 EST 2002

2002-02-28 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
flood STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/01/17 01:09:45 $] Release: milestone-04: In development milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002 ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001 milestone-02: Tagged August 13, 2001

[STATUS] (perl-framework) Wed Feb 27 23:45:37 EST 2002

2002-02-28 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/06 18:57:59 $] Stuff to do: * finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if framework failed) * change existing tests that frob the DocumentRoot (e.g.,

Re: Small change to default log file names

2002-02-28 Thread Brian Pane
Aaron Bannert wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:36PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: Can we change the default log file names form _log to log? I have moved to Windows recently (work requires it), and on Windows, files must have an extension in order to be able to associate the file with a program

Re: daemontools/foreground support in 1.3.*

2002-02-28 Thread Michael Handler
Sorry for the lack of quick response, I had to go home for a family funeral. Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -0. I personally believe that this shouldn't be backported. If you want this, you should use 2.0. Others will disagree vehemently though, and you may indeed garner

Re: daemontools/foreground support in 1.3.*

2002-02-28 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 04:00:34AM -0500, Michael Handler wrote: I completely understand the desire to not to introduce substantial changes into 13* at this point, as well as encouraging people to test the stability and correctness of 20 However: I have added it to our contrib section for

RE: daemontools/foreground support in 1.3.*

2002-02-28 Thread Sander Striker
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 February 2002 10:30 To: Michael Handler Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: daemontools/foreground support in 1.3.* On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 04:00:34AM -0500, Michael Handler wrote: I completely understand the desire to not to

Re: Small change to default log file names

2002-02-28 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we change the default log file names form _log to .log? I have moved to Windows recently (work requires it), and on Windows, files must have an extension in order to be able to associate the file with a program. I think it would be useful to our

Re: Small change to default log file names

2002-02-28 Thread dirkx
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we change the default log file names form _log to .log? I have moved to Windows recently (work requires it), and on Windows, files must have an extension in order to be able to associate the file with a

Re: Small change to default log file names

2002-02-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
Pier Fumagalli wrote: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we change the default log file names form _log to .log? I have moved to Windows recently (work requires it), and on Windows, files must have an extension in order to be able to associate the file with a program. I think

Re: daemontools/foreground support in 1.3.*

2002-02-28 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 04:00, Michael Handler wrote: This is a tiny change, and the functionality already exists in 20 Lots of sysadmins are going to be stuck with 13* for a while from now, and this is a clear benefit to those of us who utilize daemontools, without causing any harm to anyone

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 configure.in acinclude.m4

2002-02-28 Thread Thom May
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : aaron 02/02/27 17:38:11 Modified:.configure.in acinclude.m4 Log: Fix a typo in the default cgidir variable. Set a couple more defaults if they haven't already been set, just as a precaution. Sadly this breaks

1.3.24??

2002-02-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
There are some outstanding patches still for 1.3.24, no? -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will

[PATCH] Fix configure.in for autoconf 2.52 WAS: RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 configure.in acinclude.m4

2002-02-28 Thread Sander Striker
Hi, Reposted with a clearer subject line. This fixes the problem for me (although I didn't apply the patch, but moved AC_PREFIX_DEFAULT manually). Sander * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : aaron 02/02/27 17:38:11 Modified:.configure.in acinclude.m4

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 configure.in acinclude.m4

2002-02-28 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:19:54PM +, Thom May wrote: Patch attached to move it back, and add the warning back in Committed, thanks guys -aaron

RE: [BUG] Location /dir doesn't work as expected when there is a /dir in the DocumentRoot

2002-02-28 Thread Joshua Slive
From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Today Vlad Skvortsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] stumbled over a, IMO, showstopper. He was trying out subversion and had a config where (simplified): DocumentRoot /home/svn Location /home/svn/repos DAV svn SVNPath /home/svn/repos

RE: [BUG] Location /dir doesn't work as expected when there is a /dir in the DocumentRoot

2002-02-28 Thread Sander Striker
From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 February 2002 16:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [BUG] Location /dir doesn't work as expected when there is a /dir in the DocumentRoot From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Today Vlad Skvortsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 1.3.24??

2002-02-28 Thread Brad Nicholes
I would like to get the NetWare log rotation module checked in. I should have it in fairly quickly. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., a leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, February 28, 2002 6:52:20 AM There

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/filters mod_include.c

2002-02-28 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Brian Pane wrote: +if (!APR_BRIGADE_EMPTY(ctx-ssi_tag_brigade)) { +for (;;) { +apr_bucket *e = APR_BRIGADE_LAST(ctx-ssi_tag_brigade); +if (e == APR_BRIGADE_SENTINEL(ctx-ssi_tag_brigade)) { +

Re: --enable-layout and overriding --prefix

2002-02-28 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Aaron Bannert wrote: As I pointed out in my message *and* on irc where we were just having this discussion, there is no way to let --prefix override the layout with autoconf in a way that is guaranteed to work across versions of autoconf, at least as far as I can see Am I being especially

Re: --enable-layout and overriding --prefix

2002-02-28 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:06:21PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Am I being especially thick to-day? If the layout is processed earlier in configure than the other arguments, why doesn't that solve the problem? I wasn't aware of any parallelisation done by configure :-) autoconf

Re: --enable-layout and overriding --prefix

2002-02-28 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:06:21PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: As I pointed out in my message *and* on irc where we were just having this discussion, there is no way to let --prefix override the layout with autoconf in a way that is guaranteed to work across versions of autoconf,

[PATCH] 1.3: fix Content-Length in 416 response for files 2GB

2002-02-28 Thread Peter Poeml
Hi, the attached patch for 13 fixes the Content-Length header in the 416 range not satisfiable response, that shows an overflow with files larger than 2 GB Note that while this fix makes it work, there are likely other places where the incorrect number still shows up, like in the log files

Re: --enable-layout and overriding --prefix

2002-02-28 Thread Thom May
* Rodent of Unusual Size ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Aaron Bannert wrote: As I pointed out in my message *and* on irc where we were just having this discussion, there is no way to let --prefix override the layout with autoconf in a way that is guaranteed to work across versions of

[PATCH] (1.3, 2.0) config.layout update for SuSE

2002-02-28 Thread Peter Poeml
Hi, another small patch an update for configlayout for SuSE's distributions It applies to 1323 as well as to 2032 (with some offset) Thanks, Peter -- VFS: Busy inodes after unmount Self-destruct in 5 seconds Have a nice day --- configlayoutorig Mon Jan 14 10:39:25 2002 +++

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/filters mod_include.c

2002-02-28 Thread Brian Pane
Cliff Woolley wrote: On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Brian Pane wrote: +if (!APR_BRIGADE_EMPTY(ctx-ssi_tag_brigade)) { +for (;;) { +apr_bucket *e = APR_BRIGADE_LAST(ctx-ssi_tag_brigade); +if (e ==

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/filters mod_include.c

2002-02-28 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 12:57:50PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote: The following is equivalent to the above (except it runs in constant time): /* prepend ctx-ssi_tag_brigade onto bb */ APR_BRIGADE_CONCAT(ctx-ssi_tag_brigade, bb); APR_BRIGADE_CONCAT(bb, ctx-ssi_tag_brigade); But I'd be fine

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ssl mod_ssl.h ssl_engine_config.c ssl_engine_ds.c ssl_engine_init.c

2002-02-28 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 12:01:57AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... +++ mod_ssl.h 28 Feb 2002 00:01:57 - 1.60 @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ apr_lock_t *pMutex; apr_array_header_t *aRandSeed; int nScoreboardSize; /* used for builtin random

Re: [PATCH] (1.3, 2.0) config.layout update for SuSE

2002-02-28 Thread Aaron Bannert
Should I just create a new section labled Layout SuSE7? -aaron On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 08:19:46PM +0100, Peter Poeml wrote: another small patch an update for configlayout for SuSE's distributions It applies to 1323 as well as to 2032 (with some offset) Thanks, Peter -- VFS: Busy

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/filters mod_include.c

2002-02-28 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Greg Stein wrote: /* prepend ctx-ssi_tag_brigade onto bb */ APR_BRIGADE_CONCAT(ctx-ssi_tag_brigade, bb); APR_BRIGADE_CONCAT(bb, ctx-ssi_tag_brigade); That is *very* obtuse. I can't imagine anybody figuring out that

Re: [PATCH] (1.3, 2.0) config.layout update for SuSE

2002-02-28 Thread Peter Poeml
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:13:10PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: Should I just create a new section labled Layout SuSE7? Yes, why not while I doubt that the SuSE 6x section is still needed, it would not harm to keep it of course The transition with the man path was actually between 64 and 70

Re: [PATCH] (1.3, 2.0) config.layout update for SuSE

2002-02-28 Thread Roy T. Fielding
Should I just create a new section labled Layout SuSE7? No, just replace it The worst that could happen is the man directory not being found on an old SuSE 6x, which is an easy fix to the user Keep in mind that the layout is normally only used by the package installers prior to burning the CD

[ANNOUNCE] Debian packages for 2.0.32

2002-02-28 Thread Thom May
Hi, as the topic suggests, I've finally got a package set that I think is releasable. If some people would like to test it, that would be great. To do so, simply point apt to: deb http://pandora.debian.org/~thom/apache2 ./ deb-src http://pandora.debian.org/~thom/apache2 ./ or use your favourite

Re: 1.3.24??

2002-02-28 Thread Michael Handler
Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I would like to get the NetWare log rotation module checked in. I should have it in fairly quickly. I thought no new features were going into the 1.3.* tree? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (michael handler) washington, dc

Re: daemontools/foreground support in 1.3.*

2002-02-28 Thread Michael Handler
| I am of the mind that it should not be added, but I won't stop anyone | if they garner 3 +1s from actual testing and feedback. Anyone willing to step up with any +1s? It's an easy compile and test, folks; just remember to run it under a shell without job control. Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL

Re: daemontools/foreground support in 1.3.*

2002-02-28 Thread Jos Backus
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 01:03:33AM -0500, Michael Handler wrote: | I am of the mind that it should not be added, but I won't stop anyone | if they garner 3 +1s from actual testing and feedback. Does my +1 count? -- Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA

installing binaries in sbin?

2002-02-28 Thread Brian Pane
Did something break just recently in the configure script for 20? A 'make install' is installing the httpd binary in prefix/sbin rather than prefix/bin --Brian

Re: installing binaries in sbin?

2002-02-28 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 10:41:09PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote: Did something break just recently in the configure script for 20? A 'make install' is installing the httpd binary in prefix/sbin rather than prefix/bin Welcome to autoconf I believe Aaron and Thom are writing their own parsers to

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/filters mod_include.c

2002-02-28 Thread Brian Pane
Cliff Woolley wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Greg Stein wrote: /* prepend ctx-ssi_tag_brigade onto bb */ APR_BRIGADE_CONCAT(ctx-ssi_tag_brigade, bb); APR_BRIGADE_CONCAT(bb, ctx-ssi_tag_brigade); That is *very* obtuse I can't imagine anybody figuring out

Re: installing binaries in sbin?

2002-02-28 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 10:41:09PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote: Did something break just recently in the configure script for 20? A 'make install' is installing the httpd binary in prefix/sbin rather than prefix/bin Yes Due to some changes I committed we've fallen back on the autoconf defaults I