On 18 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jwoolley02/03/17 22:37:33
>
> Modified:modules/experimental mod_cache.h mod_mem_cache.c
> Log:
> Get mod_mem_cache to compile cleanly again on linux, where apr_atomic_t
> is a struct.
Hey Bill...
Do me a favor and look over this (ie,
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 11:01:38PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >Yep... Actually on tomcat we mail them to tomcat-dev, but it's up to you
> >guys, just let me know the mail address to subscribe :)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [which is generic enough for the -next- transition :-]
++1. But, I t
At 08:29 PM 3/17/2002, you wrote:
> >> On tomcat, we do it by setting the "default owner" of the bug, and when
> >> someone takes ownership, simply puts the ML in the CC field (tricky, but
> >> that's the only way to do it. Scarab should solve this).
> >
> > Okay. So, if we get a bugs@httpd ML cr
Introduces ap_rset_content_type()... This patch is not complete, I have not finished
reviewing it (or doing the doc), but it should demonstrate Ryan and Sander's suggestion
for inserting resource filters based on content type. I am a bit concerned about some
crufty code paths inserting the same fi
on 3/17/02 5:32 PM, "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fair enough, but as I understand matters, Scarab does not support any
> migration path from GNATS->Scarab, but does from Bugzilla->Scarab.
If you can convert the GNATS data into Scarab's DTD, then it can be imported
(once I fin
"Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 01:08:33AM +, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>>> 5) Potentially add a bugzilla.apache.org CNAME that is a redirect
>>> to http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla. [DNS and httpd admin]
>>
>> See other email...
>
> Fair enough, but
dean gaudet wrote:
>hey -- i was just cleaning out my [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox (so much spam :)
>and found this. it appears to be a bug i fixed in 1.3 but the fix wasn't
>applied to 2.0? is there any general plan to sweep through 1.3 fixes and
>merge them into 2.0?
>
I don't know about the ge
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 01:08:33AM +, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > 5) Potentially add a bugzilla.apache.org CNAME that is a redirect
> > to http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla. [DNS and httpd admin]
>
> See other email...
Fair enough, but as I understand matters, Scarab does not support any
mig
That's what we get weekly on Tomcat for the bugs...
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 18:02:01 -
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2002/03/17]
>
> +-
"Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) Add new OS entries for 'BeOS', 'OS/2', 'Netware'. [Bugzilla admin]
Done...
> 3) Determine if we want a separate Apache 2.0 bugzilla project.
> Doing so makes the component list *much* easier. Otherwise,
> there will be things that don't ma
"Ask Bjoern Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>> 5) Potentially add a bugzilla.apache.org CNAME that is a redirect
>>to http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla. [DNS and httpd admin]
>
> How about changing the bugzilla installation to be known a
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 5) Potentially add a bugzilla.apache.org CNAME that is a redirect
>to http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla. [DNS and httpd admin]
How about changing the bugzilla installation to be known as
bugzilla.apache.org (so no redirect).
--
ask bjoern ha
Hi,
here is the patch for httpd-2.0 to rename apr_explode_gmt to
apr_time_exp_gmt in line with the patch I just sent to apr.
Cheers,
-Thom
Index: include/util_time.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/include/util_time.h,v
re
> > 4) Upon completion of #3, populate components. I don't like the
> >GNATS components as they are poorly chosen. I think we can
> >come up with better ones than that. [dev@httpd consensus]
>
> Well, I think we need every module in there, and a few other things
like
> "build", "confi
At 03:51 PM 3/17/2002, you wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 03:53:00PM -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > +1 for separate projects based on the advice of the bugzilla-experienced
> > people.
>
>What should we call it then? Apache httpd 2.0? httpd 2.0?
Apache httpd-1.3
Apache httpd-2.0
are unambigou
If the mod's syntax works anyting like Cisco ACL features than you will want
to put this instead
SetHandler server-status
Order allow,deny
Allow from localhost
Deny from all
Just a guess
##
Darrel Clute, CCNA
Partner/CEO
Acumen Technology Group
Hi all!
I´m having a little problem with server-satatus that it´s returning me
forbidden every time i try it. Below you can see my configuration in
httpd.conf, and the error returned in the logs.
SetHandler server-status
Order deny,allow
Deny from all
Allow from localhost
[S
hey -- i was just cleaning out my [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox (so much spam :)
and found this. it appears to be a bug i fixed in 1.3 but the fix wasn't
applied to 2.0? is there any general plan to sweep through 1.3 fixes and
merge them into 2.0?
-dean
-- Forwarded message --
Date
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 03:53:00PM -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> +1 for separate projects based on the advice of the bugzilla-experienced
> people.
What should we call it then? Apache httpd 2.0? httpd 2.0?
> Well, I think we need every module in there, and a few other things like
> "build", "
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
> +1. Will changing the default "owner" for all the components to this
> mailing list accomplish that?
Only if noone ever takes ownership of bugs.
What we really want is the same effect as the mailing list being on the
cc list for all bugs.
It would a
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 3) Determine if we want a separate Apache 2.0 bugzilla project.
>Doing so makes the component list *much* easier. Otherwise,
>there will be things that don't make sense for 2.0 in 1.3 and
>vice-versa. [dev@httpd consensus]
+1 for separate projects based o
Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is absolutely necessary that bug reports and changes to bug reports
> are sent to the bugs mailing list.
>
> Bugzilla's "default" model of just assigning them to someone and having
> that person responsible for dealing with them (or having to have s
I don't believe I have enough karma to do any of these items. So,
I would greatly appreciate it if the necessary people could please
step up and help out here. infrastructure@ is CCed in case some
people with access are reading that instead of dev@httpd.
[For those on infrastructure@, httpd is
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > But nice work, thanks! Could we simply auto-populate the subscriptions
> > from bugz, with a NICE NOTE first that this change is happening, and how
> > to unsubscribe? Or should we email-forward bugz reports to the bugs list,
> > and let folks u
This isn't the most serious problem in the world, but it could be confusing:
Bugzilla bugid's are going to overlap with old gnats bugid's. I'm going
to try to use BZ as a prefix to differentiate the bugzilla numbers,
unless someone has a better idea.
Joshua.
Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 01:01:01PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> At 12:51 PM 3/16/2002, you wrote:
>>> Hi gang,
>>>
>>> I finally had a chance to set up the projects in Bugzilla for HTTPD.
>>> "Apache HTTPD" (for 1.3) and "Apache HTTPD 2" (f
26 matches
Mail list logo
