> From: Brian Pane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 11 September 2002 04:32
> Greg Ames wrote:
>
> >...since 10-Sep-2002 19:22:33 PDT. Looks good.
> >
> >Greg
> >
> >
>
> Does it have Justin's fix for the bucket leak (the one from earlier today)?
No, since that wasn't in the PRE1 tag.
Sa
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:21:17PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:04:31PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > does anyone recall if there was a good reason not to include this patch
> > in the main distribution ?
>
> What patch is this? -- justin
I hadn't had time to sub
>> >> If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
>> >> process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and
>> >> result in a binary that actually serves content!!
Please see the standards(5) man page. "-D_XPG4_2" is an internal macro,
so it should
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:04:31PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> does anyone recall if there was a good reason not to include this patch
> in the main distribution ?
What patch is this? -- justin
Thanks. There was a fix committed for this a couple of weeks
ago, so 2.0.41 will have the right logic.
Brian
Spinka, Kristofer wrote:
>Description:
>
> The Apache environment variable "gzip-only-text/html" was designed to
>allow control over whether non-text/html content will be c
Description:
The Apache environment variable "gzip-only-text/html" was designed to
allow control over whether non-text/html content will be compressed with
the mod_deflate filter. However, there is a small logic error in the
mod_deflate.c code that prevents this from functioning pr
Finally started writing some code along these lines and now, naturally, I have
some more questions :-)
Justin, you suggested I should use AP_FTYPE_NETWORK_SET-1 as the filter type for
this kind of thing. I understand that those kinds of filters are associated with
connections rather then requests
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> WinCVS sucks big time. It's way up there on the bogometer. Use
> TortoiseCVS instead.
I should qualify that... use the latest development release of
TortoiseCVS... don't bother with the ancient "stable" release. The dev
release works fine and is muc
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, David Shane Holden wrote:
> I haven't tried to use WinCVS, so I'm of no help there, but hopefully this
WinCVS sucks big time. It's way up there on the bogometer. Use
TortoiseCVS instead.
--Cliff
Greg Ames wrote:
>...since 10-Sep-2002 19:22:33 PDT. Looks good.
>
>Greg
>
>
Does it have Justin's fix for the bucket leak (the one from earlier today)?
Brian
...since 10-Sep-2002 19:22:33 PDT. Looks good.
Greg
does anyone recall if there was a good reason not to include this patch
in the main distribution ?
Here's the solution I came to after dickin' around for hours with it a few
months ago...
Install ssh from http://www.networksimplicity.com/openssh/. You _cannot_
have cygwin installed along side this port of openssh. If you want to use
key authenication store your private key as c:\program
file
htpasswd.patch
Description: Binary data
I guess my leak is from a different source.
Refreshing files in mod_mem_cache drive up the allocated memory in
aprlib.
It is consistent and has been there since I started using mod_cache
(3-4 months ago).
Justin,
Were you using caching modules when you were able to reproduce/fix
Brad's leak?
Wha
> From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 September 2002 22:23
>> [Moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[...]
>> I think max_index is misunderstood. allocator->max_index is the index of
>> the biggest block available. index = block_size / boundary_size - 1, where
>> boundary_size is
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, it doesn't. I installed the update a bit ago, and the
> autoconf bug wasn't fixed. At least, after I installed it, the bug was
> still present.
>
Looking through the Archive.pax.gz file confirms that the autoconf stuff
ain't touched :)
--
==
Sander van Zoest wrote:
>
> There is a new August 2002 Dev Tools 10.2 Update available from ADC.
>
> I am not sure if this addresses this issue, since I do not have my
> machine with me. But I wouldn't be too surprised if it did.
>
Unfortunately, it doesn't. I installed the update a bit ago, a
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:09:39PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >From http://www.osxgnu.org/#jagbugs
>
> "August, 31 2002: Major Bug found in the GNU Autoconf implementation on 10.2 Jaguar!
> In the file /usr/share/autoconf/autoconf.m4f line 7294 should read:
>
> exit (setpgrp (0,0) == -1);])],
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:18:10PM -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
> > When you figure it out, please update the developer docs (on
> > httpd.apache.org/dev/) with the info.
> >> and howtos, and have got nowhere - SSH insists on asking for a password
> >> on every connection attempt, and won't cooperat
i have the really old cvs/ssh windows binaries here:
http://zlilo.com/ssh/
works for command line cvs'ing on windows.
you just need to set HOME and CVS_RSH env variables.
-j
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 02:41:33PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> Has anybody else noticed a memory leak when requesting pages less
> than 8k? If I repeatedly request pages less than 8k I have noticed
> that
Yeah, my recent commit to core_output_filter seems to have fixed
this for me.
We re
> When you figure it out, please update the developer docs (on
> httpd.apache.org/dev/) with the info.
>> and howtos, and have got nowhere - SSH insists on asking for a password
>> on every connection attempt, and won't cooperate.
You need to convince CVS to use public key authentication. Are yo
> [Moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 09 September 2002 22:42
>
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >
> > > Has anybody else noticed a memory leak when requesting pages less
> > > than 8k? If I repeatedly request pages less
I used a really old pre-built SSH client. Works just fine. It seems that
when I tried to set up a new box and used a newer client, it failed
miserably.
I seem to recall that I generated a keypair on another box and transferred
them onto the Windows box (in a .ssh subdir). Note that you probably h
When you figure it out, please update the developer docs (on
httpd.apache.org/dev/) with the info.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: Graham Leggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OT: CVS, SSH and Windows
>
>
> Hi
Nice job! The new documentation looks really good!
Bill
>From http://www.osxgnu.org/#jagbugs
"August, 31 2002: Major Bug found in the GNU Autoconf implementation on 10.2 Jaguar!
In the file /usr/share/autoconf/autoconf.m4f line 7294 should read:
exit (setpgrp (0,0) == -1);])],
not
exit (setpgrp (1,1) == -1);])],
As a result any program using GNU co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm also concerned about breakage... Thing is, we're using msghdr for
> > the recvmsg() calls.
>
> Yeah, I don't think Solaris uses the same structure/functions for passing
> fd's between processes.
>
Well, it looks like it *can* :)
That doesn't mean that i
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> At 11:07 AM -0700 9/10/02, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
> >> process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly unde
[Moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 September 2002 22:42
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
> > Has anybody else noticed a memory leak when requesting pages less
> > than 8k? If I repeatedly request pages less than 8k I have
At 11:07 AM -0700 9/10/02, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
>> process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and
>> result in a binary that actually
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:31:20AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> Although I like the idea of rethinking these sorts of things, I don't
> think we would do well to break current .htpasswd files or homebrew
> scripts that do the work of htpasswd.
I think we can do it in a way that wouldn't break ol
Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:19:34AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > In case you've forgotten, there is no more mod_auth. So, this is an
> > opportunity to rethink how we store passwords.
> >
> > And, in order to be backwards compatible, we can leave the $apr1$
> > fo
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:19:34AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> In case you've forgotten, there is no more mod_auth. So, this is an
> opportunity to rethink how we store passwords.
>
> I would think a much easier way would be to stop being fuzzy about
> the storage of the passwords and allo
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:46:40PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> You missed the point, anything that htpasswd or htdigest produce
> must be parsable by mod_auth or mod_auth_digest, respectively.
In case you've forgotten, there is no more mod_auth. So, this is an
opportunity to rethink how
At 10:58 AM 9/10/2002, Cyrille Artho wrote:
>Hi,
>as someone who works on multi-threaded problems, but not Apache,
>I ran into your page at
>http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/developer/thread_safety.html
>
>I strongly suggest to revise it, because it lacks depth.
Please, edit the .html however you
At 12:24 PM 9/10/2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:57:08AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I agree with Bill. Please revert this commit. The problem is that
>
>And, I think there is power in giving the user the choice to have
>correct MD5 hashes produced. Not every
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
> process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and
> result in a binary that actually serves content!! Haven't yet
> playing with using t
This message is complete hand-waving. The point of htpasswd is to create
password files for mod_auth. It doesn't create password files for use
with other authentication schemes. More to the point, if anybody ever
uses this option, it will FAIL with mod_auth. That violates the principle
of lea
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:57:08AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree with Bill. Please revert this commit. The problem is that
And, I think there is power in giving the user the choice to have
correct MD5 hashes produced. Not every use of htpasswd is going to
be fed into apr_password_v
> Before we veer off on yet another tangent, can we address the core
> issue? Should the ASF accept the code donation? I believe Greg has
> done a review of said code.
>
> Accept:
+1, and move somewhere into apr
Daniel
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Can we settle down? A donation of code was being offered, and there was
> discussion within the ASF about it, but the status of those discussions
> weren't being folded back to the donator.
>
> Before we veer off on yet another tangent, can we address
Can we settle down? A donation of code was being offered, and there was
discussion within the ASF about it, but the status of those discussions
weren't being folded back to the donator.
Before we veer off on yet another tangent, can we address the core
issue? Should the ASF accept the code donati
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:56:06PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dirkx 2002/09/10 06:56:06
>
> Modified:src CHANGES
>src/modules/standard mod_digest.c
> Log:
> Make apache work with the iCal webdav client when using
> DigestAuth. We propably should revis
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Scott Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and
result in a binary that actually serves content!! Haven't yet
playing with using the actual uid/gid aspects of perchild yet.
I'm looking to see what aff
I think I have been seeing the same thing for a long time when
refreshing entries
in mod_mem_cache. If you find something in the alloc path I
will be
more than happy to try it in my lab.
"Jean-Jacques Clar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/21/2002 06:23:58
PMTo: W G
Stoddard/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Hi,
I'am trying to use the cache module with reverse proxy, and i have few
problems.
When i'am using a browser with data in cache, like the file test.gif.
If the picture is in my browser cache before my first try with the
reverse proxy,
mod_cache is unable to cache the data, because on the fir
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:47:01AM -0700, Scott Hess wrote:
> [I am not an Apache contributor, merely a lurker, but...]
>
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Jon Travis wrote:
> > These are not coercive tactics. These are processes which are
> > beneficial to both the ASF and Covalent. I cannot continually
Hi,
I'am trying to use the cache module with reverse proxy, and i have few
problems.
When i'am using a browser with data in cache, like the file test.gif.
If the picture is in my browser cache before my first try with the
reverse proxy,
mod_cache is unable to cache the data, because on the fir
> Not in this section. Comma separation made clearer (but no explicit
> wording on white space eating) - and our old code was still at fault
> when isinsting that any non alpanumeric MUST be quoted.
Odd that the BNF doesn't require that -- it cannot be parsed
unambiguously without the quotes.
..
[I am not an Apache contributor, merely a lurker, but...]
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Jon Travis wrote:
> These are not coercive tactics. These are processes which are
> beneficial to both the ASF and Covalent. I cannot continually monitor
> the progress of this project for eternity. I'm astonished t
Contributions are more than welcome.
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Cyrille Artho wrote:
> Hi,
> as someone who works on multi-threaded problems, but not Apache, I ran
> into your page at
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/developer/thread_safety.html
>
> I strongly suggest to revise it, because it lacks
Hi,
as someone who works on multi-threaded problems, but not Apache, I ran
into your page at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/developer/thread_safety.html
I strongly suggest to revise it, because it lacks depth. First of all,
you probably should start explaining the basic problem in case a
dev
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:17:58AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> >
> > anyway, this works on -current and should do well on older releases as well.
> > patch is hand-crufted, might not apply cleanly.
> >
> > --- ap_config.h.origTue Sep 10 17:05:11 2002
> > +++ ap_
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > +/* There's probably a better way to do this, but for the time
> > being...
> > + *
> > + * Right now the parsing is very 'slack'. Actual rules from RFC
> > 2069 are:
>
> The relevant spec is RFC 2617. Were there significant chan
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > + * Right now the parsing is very 'slack'. Actual rules from RFC
> > 2069 are:
>
> The relevant spec is RFC 2617. Were there significant changes since 2069?
THANKS ! My bad - missed that. Checking..
Dw
> +/* There's probably a better way to do this, but for the time
> being...
> + *
> + * Right now the parsing is very 'slack'. Actual rules from RFC
> 2069 are:
The relevant spec is RFC 2617. Were there significant changes since 2069?
Roy
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:17:58AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> > anyway, this works on -current and should do well on older releases as well.
> > patch is hand-crufted, might not apply cleanly.
> >
> > --- ap_config.h.origTue Sep 10 17:05:11 2002
> > +++ ap_confi
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 01:36 AM 9/10/2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:00:51AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > jerenkrantz2002/09/09 20:00:50
> > >
> > > Modified:.CHANGES
> > >support htpasswd.c
>
At 01:36 AM 9/10/2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:00:51AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > jerenkrantz2002/09/09 20:00:50
> >
> > Modified:.CHANGES
> >support htpasswd.c
> > Log:
> > Add ability to htpasswd (via -5) to produce non
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 04:12, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Brian Pane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I like the idea of restricting the change to Tru64 for now, just
> > to eliminate the possibility of breaking something unexpected on
> > some other system this close to the 2.0.41 launch. Is there a
Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> anyway, this works on -current and should do well on older releases as well.
> patch is hand-crufted, might not apply cleanly.
>
> --- ap_config.h.orig Tue Sep 10 17:05:11 2002
> +++ ap_config.h Tue Sep 10 17:06:41 2002
> @@ -692,6 +692,10 @@
> #if defined __Ope
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 10:05:19AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 07:12:56AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > > Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > +#define NET_SIZE_T socklen_t
> > > Does this hold for every level of OpenBSD, or is a ve
Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 07:12:56AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > +#define NET_SIZE_T socklen_t
> > Does this hold for every level of OpenBSD, or is a version check
> > necessary?
>
> all versions >= 2.6 have socklen_t.
>
Ian Holsman sent the following bits through the ether:
> http://httpd.apache.org/test/flood/
I'm having a look at flood in comparison to ab and there's one thing
I'm not quite clear on. The source indicates it supports cookies in
the round robin mode. Do I need to enable that? Actually, what I n
Jon Travis wrote:
>
> The ASF is apparently not about working together, since I (and
> everyone else who is not on the PMC list) have been entirely left
> out of all this conversation which is going on behind closed doors.
I suspect that's rubbish, Jon, since this is the first I've heard
of this
Hi all,
I'm asking this here as there are people here who have probably got this
to work, please mail me privately.
I am trying to get WinCVS to connect to a CVS server via SSH. Both
myself and another person have independantly followed the available docs
and howtos, and have got nowhere - SS
> Do we agree that once 2.0.41 is launched it should be converted to a
> configure-time check for alloca.h, with the code changed to include
> the header if it exists, irrespective of Tru64?
+1
david
Hi,
I am adding mod_jk (from Jakarta Tomcat) to the httpd-2.0 sources in order to
build an httpd excutable with mod_jk linked staticly to it.
But I have to make a buildconf to integrate the config.m4 in the configure.
Is there a better way to get it?
Like: --activate-module=src/modules/jk/libj
Traced down to:
Authorization: Digest username="dirkx", realm="DAV", nonce="1031662894",
uri=/64Semantics.ics, response="99a6275793be28c31a5b6e4467fa4c79",
algorithm=MD5
where we get confused by the uri=/64... i.e. a non quoted value.
Dw
We seem to be able to leak 401's without an
ap_note_digest_auth_failure(r); I'd like to track down from where :-)
Using MacOSX iCal (which does DAV publishing), DAV and Apache 1.3.26:
Config:
works fine; but adding
or
require valid-user...
gives me
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 07:12:56AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > +#define NET_SIZE_T socklen_t
> Does this hold for every level of OpenBSD, or is a version check
> necessary?
all versions >= 2.6 have socklen_t.
Given that We don't support anything be
> Do we agree that once 2.0.41 is launched it should be converted to a
> configure-time check for alloca.h, with the code changed to include
> the header if it exists, irrespective of Tru64?
I like a configure time check myself, finding headers is one things the
configure program does well.
Da
Kris Verbeeck wrote:
> The response:
>
> HTTP/1.0 200
> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:45:39 GMT
> Server: web server
> Connection: close
> etag: "b9829-2269-3cd12aa1"
Another bug - why is an HTTP/1.1 response prefixed with "HTTP/1.0"...?
Regards,
Graham
--
-
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> [sorry for the crosspost. I'm moving this branch of the conversation
> to the dev@apr list]
Except of course that we have ezmlm munge the reply-to headers so
you can't control such things...
- ask (who couldn't resist, sorry) :-)
--
ask bjoern han
Does this hold for every level of OpenBSD, or is a version check
necessary?
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Index: src/include/ap_config.h
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/httpd/src/include/ap_config.h,v
> retrieving
Brian Pane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I like the idea of restricting the change to Tru64 for now, just
> to eliminate the possibility of breaking something unexpected on
> some other system this close to the 2.0.41 launch. Is there a
> standard preprocessor macro that compilers on Tru64 defin
Hi,
When refreshing a page (with IE) the browser sends a 'If-Modified-Since'
header in the request. As seen in the debug log below, mod_cache has
verified that the page has not been modified and wants to return an HTTP
status 304. Somehow this 304 doesn't get to the browser. Instead of
sending
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
[...]
> Personally, I would just advocate shifting to Subversion. Part of our
> release process injects the revision number into the header file. Thus, the
> tarball always states *precisely* what revision the code came from.
FWIW; for perl5 perforce is used
> > Which closed doors are those? There has been discussion on the dev list
> > and on the board list. Both of which are public lists that you can
> > subscribe to.
>
> All I know of is the PMC list (which is private), but discussion on
> board@ (which is also private) is news to me.
Well, I ha
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:57:06AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > The ASF is apparently not about working together, since I (and
> > everyone else who is not on the PMC list) have been entirely left
> > out of all this conversation which is going on behind closed doors.
>
> Which closed doors a
> The ASF is apparently not about working together, since I (and
> everyone else who is not on the PMC list) have been entirely left
> out of all this conversation which is going on behind closed doors.
Which closed doors are those? There has been discussion on the dev list
and on the board list
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:33:25PM -0700, Jon Travis wrote:
> Ok, since I'm not seeing any activity towards getting this
> integrated, I'd like to set a deadline. This would help
> me out, since it gives direction as to where the project
> can go, as well as the ASF since political discussion sh
85 matches
Mail list logo