Re: [PATCH] Get mod_specweb99 to compile against 2.0.43

2002-10-25 Thread Sander Temme
I noticed that there were some places where u_int32_t is being used instead of apr_uint32_t. Is it purposefully done OR is it one of those Oh, the apr interface changed stuff ?. Anyways, I've included a patch that atleast gets the module to compile against 2.0.43. Pl. let me know if it's

Re: [PATCH] Get mod_specweb99 to compile against 2.0.43

2002-10-25 Thread gregames
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: I noticed that there were some places where u_int32_t is being used instead of apr_uint32_t. Is it purposefully done OR is it one of those Oh, the apr interface changed stuff ?. Anyways, I've included a patch that atleast gets the module to

Re: [PATCH]: Counting I/O with FLUSH and OFN (no MMN bump)

2002-10-25 Thread Brian Pane
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 19:48, Bojan Smojver wrote: Brian, Bill, This is what I meant by my previous comment about core_pre_connection v. core_post_config and the optional function fetching. I have tested this and it worked even after a graceful restart and when I killed all child processes

[PROPOSAL] make child processes more awareable

2002-10-25 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, This proposal is from the module developer point of view, so it might be totally wrong from the server one. Simply I wish as a module (I'm trying to write that in a second person; and certainly in the bad English ;) to be aware of the server status. More frankly couple of things: 1. Am I

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server request.c

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Index: request.c === RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/request.c,v retrieving revision 1.115 retrieving revision 1.116 diff -u -u -r1.115 -r1.116 --- request.c 5 Sep 2002

RE: [PATCH] Try to use OPENSSL_free instead of free

2002-10-25 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: Can somebody _please_ take some time to review and tell me if the patch is okay. Hey Madhu! I apologize on behalf of the group for letting patches slip through the cracks. It's unfortunately the case all too often that

Re: byterange filter/redirect bug?

2002-10-25 Thread gregames
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We shouldn't be returning 416 Invalid Range for something that's redirected, but it sure looks like we are. I wonder what the byterange filter does when it sees a redirect response, and there are input Range: headers? To answer my own question, it's definately

Re: [PATCH] Try to use OPENSSL_free instead of free

2002-10-25 Thread Joshua Slive
Cliff Woolley wrote: We should consider (again) setting up some kind of 'submitted patches' tracking system. Bugzilla will work fine for that. I try to attach the PatchAvailable keyword to bugs I see coming in with patches.

response to comments re: API changing

2002-10-25 Thread Carla Schroder
Hello excellent Apache developers, I am writing a feature on Apache 2 for crossnodes.com. It will cover new features, and quotes from users on why they are, or are not, upgrading from 1.3. (Besides 'if it ain't broke don't fix it') Would any of you care to address the following comment? This

RE: response to comments re: API changing

2002-10-25 Thread Bill Stoddard
My comments... Hello excellent Apache developers, I am writing a feature on Apache 2 for crossnodes.com. It will cover new features, and quotes from users on why they are, or are not, upgrading from 1.3. (Besides 'if it ain't broke don't fix it') Would any of you care to address the

Re: response to comments re: API changing

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
Carla Schroder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like to hear from the actual developers on this! I read back several months in the list archives, to get some background. Technically, the API changes have been pretty minor. A module that was working with alpha/beta Apache 2 at the beginning of

Re: [PROPOSAL] make child processes more awareable

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, This proposal is from the module developer point of view, so it might be totally wrong from the server one. Can't some of this info be gleaned from ap_mpm_query()? Have you looked at that? -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell...

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/http http_protocol.c

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gregames2002/10/25 11:25:12 Modified:modules/http http_protocol.c Log: don't apply byte ranges to redirects, error documents, etc. This needs to be listed in CHANGES. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Re: [PATCH] Try to use OPENSSL_free instead of free

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Based on Nadav Har'El's e-mail on the mod_ssl community (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modsslm=103540998016916w=2), here's a patch for 2.0's mod_ssl. committed, thanks! -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in

RE: [PATCH]Question - regarding modssl_PEM_read_bio_X509

2002-10-25 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Oh !!.. That is correct. The SSL_LIBRARY_VERSION is only defined by the ssl_util_ssl.h. (sorry) -Madhu -Original Message- From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:trawick;attglobal.net] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH]Question - regarding

Re: [PATCH]Question - regarding modssl_PEM_read_bio_X509

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh !!.. That is correct. The SSL_LIBRARY_VERSION is only defined by the ssl_util_ssl.h. (sorry) make clean make after changing a header file and before sharing with the world does wonders :) -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH]: Counting I/O with FLUSH and OFN (no MMN bump)

2002-10-25 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 17:01, Brian Pane wrote: Tested and committed. Thanks! Thanks. Bojan

Re: mod_logio patch testing Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Oct 2323:45:19 EDT 2002

2002-10-25 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 15:31, Brian Pane wrote: The only test case in which mod_logio didn't report as small a byte count as expected was when I used telnet as the client and stopped it (with ctrl-C) while the server was still sending the response. A syscall trace on the server showed that,

Re: response to comments re: API changing

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Carla Schroder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like to hear from the actual developers on this! I read back several months in the list archives, to get some background. Technically, the API changes have been pretty minor. A module that was working

Re: SOS! HELP- APACHE PROCESS PROBLEM

2002-10-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
Chandragupt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, We have developed a BioInformatics Web based Application using CGIC , Linux and Apache as the webserver. We are using MySQL database for data handling. We have run into a problem wherein if the browser which has sent the request to Apache is

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/loggers mod_logio.c

2002-10-25 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 16:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note: This works by adding a flush bucket to each response when mod_logio is used; the side-effect is that pipelined responses get broken up into separate network writes per request (but there's no impact on pipelining when

[PATCH] mod_negotiation.c

2002-10-25 Thread André Malo
[ Simply trying again; or according to Jeff: nag, nag, nag ;-) ] If you use the body feature in type map files, the MIME-headers currently are set dependant on what (mostly) type_checker says about the type map file. The attached patch sets the MIME-type, charset, content-language and

Re: SOS! HELP- APACHE PROCESS PROBLEM

2002-10-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 07:04 PM 10/25/2002, Jeff Trawick wrote: Chandragupt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, We have developed a BioInformatics Web based Application using CGIC , Linux and Apache as the webserver. We are using MySQL database for data handling. We have run into a problem wherein if the browser

Re: [PATCH] mod_negotiation.c

2002-10-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 07:44 PM 10/25/2002, you wrote: [ Simply trying again; or according to Jeff: nag, nag, nag ;-) ] If you use the body feature in type map files, the MIME-headers currently are set dependant on what (mostly) type_checker says about the type map file. The attached patch sets the MIME-type,