flood STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/09/06 10:24:42 $]
Release:
1.0: Released July 23, 2002
milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002
ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001
milestone-02: Tagged August 13,
--On Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:46 AM +0100 Jacek Prucia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it be better, if we use proxy instead of all-purpose network
software? I was thinking about mod_proxy_flood.so with some function attached
to request forwarding and a simple response handler which could
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 01:46 AM, Jacek Prucia wrote:
* Write robust tool (using tethereal perhaps) to take network
dumps
and convert them to flood's XML format.
Status: Justin volunteers. Aaron had a script somewhere that
is
a start.
Wouldn't it be
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes - all the way back. They provided patches for the older versions,
but RSA seems to be less and less enthusiastic about patching the
ancient 2001 and prior releases, e.g 1.2/1.3.
:) Yup. I had a similar
-Original Message-
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, when you commit, please just toss the old macro. There is zero
sense in
keeping the cruft around. -- justin
Sure.. will do.
P.S. Madhu, *please*, *please*, *please* use unified diffs in the future.
* Aaron Bannert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 12:51 PM, Oden Eriksson wrote:
Anyway..., despite this enormous disregard or what it is called,
mandrake
Linux will be the first distribution shipping apache2 (my packaging),
_plus_
a whole bunch of other
[Resend. There are currently two outstanding fixes for public security
issues in the 2.0 stable branch: this and escaping of untrusted request
data in mod_log_config which Andre forward-ported from 1.3]
Hi, here is a version of the patch in #17206 which removes the current
the fd leaks. Most of
Resending this to this list as I got no response on users list.
Currently, we are using flat config files generated by our website
provisioning software to support our mass hosted customers. The reason
for doing it this way, and not using the mod_vhost_alias module is
because we need to be able
Stas Bekman wrote:
I get these 3 files installed together with other httpd-2/apr files on
linux:
~/httpd/prefork/modules/httpd.exp
~/httpd/prefork/lib/apr.exp
~/httpd/prefork/lib/aprutil.exp
Won't it make sense to not install them on OSes where they have no use?
These are needed only on AIX.
Trevor Hurst wrote:
I'm wondering if I should see mod_ldap in the
static listing of the modules I compiled in?
I don;t see mod_ldap but a few others such as mod_auth_ldap.c
and util_ldap.c. Am I missing something?
util_ldap.c is the same as mod_ldap. It's just named funny.
Look in the source
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Anyone have any first hand experience with kerberos authentication in
the server?
.. well - we have ripped code out of telnet(d) from KTH-their Heimdal's on
*BSD to do this for a finance customer - who had some (silly but
Hi there,
Thanks for filling in the SSL-C bits Madhu, looks like a clean fit.
* MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
Anyways, nice patch - I'd prefer if you would
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ake 2003/03/04 14:15:52
Modified:.CHANGES
server/mpm/winnt child.c mpm_winnt.c mpm_winnt.h
Log:
Added the WindowsSocketsWorkaroud directive for Windows NT/2000/XP
to work around problems with certain VPN and Firewall products
At 12:57 PM 3/13/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ake 2003/03/04 14:15:52
Modified:.CHANGES
server/mpm/winnt child.c mpm_winnt.c mpm_winnt.h
Log:
Added the WindowsSocketsWorkaroud directive for Windows NT/2000/XP
to work around problems
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:57 PM 3/13/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ake 2003/03/04 14:15:52
Modified:.CHANGES
server/mpm/winnt child.c mpm_winnt.c mpm_winnt.h
Log:
Added the WindowsSocketsWorkaroud directive for Windows NT/2000/XP
to
Rather than WindowsSocketsWorkaround, why not WinUseWinsock1 or ??. It
would be better I think if the directive somehow indicated exactly what
it was doing (causing the winnt mpm to use the select/accept winsock1
calls rather than AcceptEx, a winsock2 call).
We're still usng winsock2 with this
The new upcoming servlet API will include some new methods to retrieve the
connection IP and PORT in case of proxied HTTP requests.
It will be basically required to obtain the following:
- IP + PORT of the remote client
- IP + PORT of requested by the client
- IP + PORT where the request was
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new upcoming servlet API will include some new methods to retrieve the
connection IP and PORT in case of proxied HTTP requests.
It will be basically required to obtain the following:
- IP + PORT of the remote client
- IP + PORT of requested by
When
sending multiple buckets on a socket does writev and WSASend create a packet per buffer, or a single packet for
all buffers?
I
would assume the answer might depend on the Operating system or maybe the size
of the buffers. I'm interested in Windows 2000 and linux.
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The X-Forwarded-For would contain something like 192.168.1.2:19876 (instead
of just the first bit before the ':'), and I would need to add another
header containing the IP of the client connection (I was thinking about
something like:
Hi,
is there a need that we open error_log for reading from within httpd ?
--- httpd-2.0/server/log.c.orig Thu Mar 13 19:47:20 2003
+++ httpd-2.0/server/log.c Thu Mar 13 19:47:48 2003
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@
return DONE;
}
if ((rc = apr_file_open(s-error_log,
Hi,
On a lighter note :).. I would think Move entries to the
current... would be more appropriate than Remove ..
-Madhu
$ head -3 CHANGES
Changes with Apache 2.1.0-dev
[Remove entries to the current 2.0 section below, when backported]
I would also love to see such a module available, and im very willing to
contribute in any way i can, however, im skillless in the C arena :(
Good luck.
Tim
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Ollerenshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:27 PM
These are neat ideas. At a few companies I've worked for we already do
similar things but we have scripts that generate the httpd.conf files
and distribute them out to the web servers and gracefully restart.
Adding a new web server machine to the mix is as simple as adding the
host name to the
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 04:55:19PM -0800, David Burry wrote:
These are neat ideas. At a few companies I've worked for we already do
similar things but we have scripts that generate the httpd.conf files
and distribute them out to the web servers and gracefully restart.
Adding a new web server
Resending this to this list as I got no response on users list.
Sorry, I missed the original version of this post.
Currently, we are using flat config files generated by our website
provisioning software to support our mass hosted customers. The reason
for doing it this way, and not
On Friday, March 14, 2003, at 10:15 AM, Zac Stevens wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 04:55:19PM -0800, David Burry wrote:
These are neat ideas. At a few companies I've worked for we already
do
similar things but we have scripts that generate the httpd.conf files
and distribute them out to the web
On Friday, March 14, 2003, at 09:00 AM, Tim Nagel wrote:
I would also love to see such a module available, and im very willing
to
contribute in any way i can, however, im skillless in the C arena :(
Learn C, and you're on the team!
Good luck.
Tim
Nathan.
--
Nathan Ollerenshaw - Systems
On Friday, March 14, 2003, at 09:55 AM, David Burry wrote:
These are neat ideas. At a few companies I've worked for we already do
similar things but we have scripts that generate the httpd.conf files
and distribute them out to the web servers and gracefully restart.
Adding a new web server
29 matches
Mail list logo
