Hy all,
I have installed flood and I am trying to use it for mini_httpd evaluation.
All connections established by flood failed.
Does flood only oriented for httpd tests ?
or there is some configuration to do in order to evaluate mini_httpd ?
Thank you for help
best regards
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
I'm glad you're making progress. But I'm wondering why
raising the mod_cgid
Listen backlog was so important. If 100 mod_cgid connections
wasn't enough at
some point, either the workload is spikey or the
I enabled the POST transactions, and all of a sudden, the apache process is
now hung (this is first time I'm seeing this behaviour).. The stack is :
(gdb) t 21
[Switching to thread 21 (system thread 29207)]
#0 0xc0306850:0 in _semop_sys+0x30 () from
/usr/lib/hpux64/libc.so.1
(gdb) bt
#0
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 07:52:03AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
FWIW, it segfaults on a jsp request... I suppose that this is handled by a
third party module such as mod_jk? See the final snippet:
[pid 32119] read(11, GET /messaging/businessObject.js..., 4096) = 775
[pid 32119]
Hi,
If someone has a bit of time, we've got a bunch of backports in the
STATUS file that already have 3 +1s which can be merged.
Sander
Backported from 2.1. Stable for me in various loads.
--
Brian Akins
Senior Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
--- /home/bakins/src/httpd-2.0.48/server/mpm/worker/fdqueue.c 2003-11-06
08:16:03.0 -0500
+++ fdqueue.c 2003-09-28 23:58:41.0 -0400
@@ -57,26 +57,40 @@
*/
So (Ben), what is it that breaks with BSD make when reverting the
cruft that has been added to server/Makefile.in to use an absolute path
to exports.c? This works for me with srcdir=builddir and
srcdir!=builddir with the FreeBSD 4.2 make, and GNU make -j2 still works
too.
The 2.0 branch still
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
I think I found the problem (.. and it's not the cgid exiting problem).
The problem was because the default Listen Backlog in mod_cgid was a little
small (100 outstanding connections). I got the following tusc log for the
httpd processes :
{62717}
wow, I didn't expect to see this followed up upon. thanks.
maybe httpd developers should be stranded in airports more often...
also, several weeks ago somebody was complaining to me about various
things they didn't like about Apache 2... one of the ones I took note of
was having httpd
I'll work on the real httpd -V
stuff later this afternoon.
here is the latest patch. basically, it's the same as what I submitted
before. the differences are those suggested by stas and jeff - make the
AP_MPMQ_STATIC/DYNAMIC wording a bit better and axe the -D APACHE_MPM_DIR=
stuff.
so, the
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 08:40:05AM -0500, Brian Akins wrote:
Backported from 2.1. Stable for me in various loads.
Cool! What OS/arch are you using? Also, any idea how well it performs
compared to before the patch?
-aaron
Aaron Bannert wrote:
Cool! What OS/arch are you using? Also, any idea how well it performs
compared to before the patch?
Currently Linux on i386 (with non-portable-atomics). I have not noticed
any increase in performance, but I can, now, easily have 4096 active
clients, whereas things got
--On Tuesday, December 02, 2003 14:11:20 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jorton 2003/12/02 06:11:20
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH CHANGES STATUS
modules/ssl Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH ssl_engine_init.c
ssl_engine_log.c
Log:
Backport
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
stoddard2003/11/20 12:12:13
Modified:docs/manual/mod mpm_common.xml mpm_winnt.xml
Log:
Win32: MaxMemFree works with mpm_winnt
I noticed this change while I was trying to backport
Japanese translation of 2.1 document to 2.0. Since this
change is only
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Yoshiki Hayashi wrote:
One thing that puzzled me while checking the code is that
mpm_winnt.c doesn't call apr_allocator_max_free_set like any
other MPMs (except perchild). Doesn't it have to call it,
too?
Yes. I guess I should go back and review FB's change...
--Cliff
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Yoshiki Hayashi wrote:
One thing that puzzled me while checking the code is that
mpm_winnt.c doesn't call apr_allocator_max_free_set like any
other MPMs (except perchild). Doesn't it have to call it,
too?
Yes. I guess I
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stoddard2003/11/20 11:44:19
Modified:.CHANGES
server/mpm/winnt child.c mpm.h
Log:
Win32: Make Win32 MPM transaction pools honor MaxMemFree
/* Create the tranaction pool */
-
Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One thing that puzzled me while checking the code is that
mpm_winnt.c doesn't call apr_allocator_max_free_set like any
other MPMs (except perchild). Doesn't it have to call it,
too?
Yes. I guess I should go back and review FB's change...
Oh,
18 matches
Mail list logo
