On Jun 14, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
I suppose we could fix Apache::testold (it was renamed) to have -d if
it can be made into more than a hack. Though I'm not sure when a new
version of mp1 is going to be released.
Looks like it would be pretty easy to add to MM_test(), though I
Greetings.
I'm currently working on a benchmarking project, using the apache flood
program to get some idea of the load capacity of various sorts of hardware
that are normally sent to the salvage yard at the University where I am
presently under-paid. They dump literally tons of hardwaqre, and I
* Rajesh Munikuntla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list, Redhat is de-supporting Stronghold on Solaris
servers from next year. We use lot of Dynamo modules
configured in Apache, Anyone know a Vendor who
supports Apache?.
The is not the right place to ask. Please address this question to a user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes2004/06/11 09:15:43
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH CHANGES STATUS
modules/experimental Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH util_ldap.c
Log:
Allow relative paths for LDAPTrustedCA to be resolved against ServerRoot PR#26602
Have the docs
* Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to confirm - are docs changes subject to RTC?
No.
nd
Hi Sander,
Agreed. I'm willing to volunteer to do the TR. May aswell
cut a 2.1 at the same time aswell...
that would be really great!
Hopefully it will make it then also up to the mirrors...
Guenter.
Hi,
As I saw nobody knows about Windows HTTP API
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/http/http/http_api_start_page.asp).
Could anybody help me how could I add non socket based request processing to
Apache HTTPD.
I analised the source code and I was unable to find where could I add this
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 01:45:26PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Actually I think this was addressed quite a while ago with the
introduction of the MaxMemFree directive. This problem sounds a lot
like the bucket issue where memory
Hi,
does somebody know if its possible to move a file from one dir to another without
loosing the history?
thanks, Guenter.
hello,
i'm forwarding a mail i sent to the apache-modules ml. i hope i'll have
answers here, thanks for feedback.
Original Message
Subject: [apache-modules] apache gives me a NULL config_file * pointer
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:20:16 +0200
From: Julien ALLANOS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do the docs need to be updated for this change? Allowing relative
paths to be resolved against ServerRoot seemed like fairly standard
procedure.
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 03:40:52PM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
AFAIK, the linux x86 atomic stuff can be used unchanged on Linux
x86_64. This is based on my digging in the kernel source. All the
functions apr uses are identical.
This is already done for APR HEAD: a
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 10:29, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
does somebody know if its possible to move a file from one dir to
another without loosing the history?
With CVS, you must have an administrator hand-move the RCS file in the
repository. (Of course, then nothing records the fact that the
Brad Nicholes wrote:
Do the docs need to be updated for this change? Allowing relative
paths to be resolved against ServerRoot seemed like fairly standard
procedure.
Looking at the docs there now, I think you're right. Just wanted to
check whether there was anything that implied an absolute
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:23:42PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
OK, the issues I was having with using the bucket allocator to allocate
the brigade were just my own screwups. So, the patches needed to fix
this issue are attached:
1) re-use pool
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
2) allocate brigade structures using the bucket allocator
If you're going to do this, then surely you need to call
apr_pool_cleanup_register() somewhere?
===
RCS file:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:14:53PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
2) allocate brigade structures using the bucket allocator
If you're going to do this, then surely you need to call
apr_pool_cleanup_register() somewhere?
apr_brigade_create() does that
At 11:51 AM 6/15/2004, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
does somebody know if its possible to move a file from one dir
to another without loosing the history?
It usually boils down to this:
1. Copy the ,v file in the repository to the new location
copying it in the repository should actually just work - I don't
remember any extra steps for moving something to a different dir
* Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-15 17:45]:
Hi,
does somebody know if its possible to move a file from one dir to another without
loosing the history?
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
apr_brigade_create() does that already.
Oh, duh, of course it does. As many times as I've looked at that line,
you'd think I'd have it memorized by now. :)
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* modules/echo/mod_echo.c (process_echo_connection): Fix brigade
handling: don't re-use a passed brigade.
Hang on.. why is the passed brigade getting destroyed? You're supposed to
be able to reuse your brigades after the call stack has returned
@@ -1340,7 +1343,7 @@
/* Run cleanups */
run_cleanups(pool-cleanups);
-pool-cleanups = NULL;
+pool-free_cleanups = pool-cleanups = NULL;
/* If new child pools showed up, this is a reason to raise a flag */
if (pool-child)
@@ -1886,7 +1889,13 @@
#endif /*
Bill Stoddard wrote:
@@ -1340,7 +1343,7 @@
/* Run cleanups */
run_cleanups(pool-cleanups);
-pool-cleanups = NULL;
+pool-free_cleanups = pool-cleanups = NULL;
/* If new child pools showed up, this is a reason to raise a flag */
if (pool-child)
@@ -1886,7 +1889,13 @@
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 05:08:18PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* modules/echo/mod_echo.c (process_echo_connection): Fix brigade
handling: don't re-use a passed brigade.
Hang on.. why is the passed brigade getting destroyed? You're
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
Hmmm, doing anything with a brigade after you pass it on to the next
filter surely breaks the golden caller relinquishes ownership of the
brigade rule for using ap_pass_brigade()?
I'm saying I thought the rule was expressly opposite that. :)
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 06:00:01PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
Hmmm, doing anything with a brigade after you pass it on to the next
filter surely breaks the golden caller relinquishes ownership of the
brigade rule for using ap_pass_brigade()?
I'm
http://www.oliver-klas.de
http://www.buergerbewegungen.de
http://www.moschee-wertheim.de
http://www.auslaendergewalt.ch
http://www.rocknord.de
http://www.NoTurkishmembership.com
http://www.der-ruf-nach-freiheit.de
http://www.Euronational.org
http://www.pro-koeln-online.de
In #apache on FreeNode IRC, mod_unique_id is one of the most common
problems. Thanks to some distributions (ahem. gentoo.), that commonly
do not configure DNS correctly, and enable mod_unique_id by default,
several times a day people come in saying apache will not start for
them.
I see three
Mark J Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A security issue has been reported in mod_proxy. See
http://www.guninski.com/modproxy1.html
The flaw affects Apache httpd 1.3.25 to 1.3.31 that have mod_proxy enabled
and configured. Apache httpd 2.0 is unaffected.
- snip -
A patch to correct this issue is
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
The only moment where it's appropriate for a module to push Defines
values into
ap_server_config_defines is during the register_hook phase. The problem
is that
this phase is called earlier for compiled-in modules than for loaded
modules.
So a module trying to
30 matches
Mail list logo
