On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 07:45:17 -0700
Guy Ferraiolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's great. I have a need for non-numeric random substitution and I
don't want to do something contradictory.
I was hoping for a few days dedicated to flood development, but I had to
settle for a few hours. Somehow I
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Paul Querna wrote:
Any other opinions about not including these MPMs?
Basically agree.
But modules are on a sliding scale between fully-working and broken.
We have modules/experimental that includes pre-stable stuff that may
or may not get fixed within a reasonable
Paul Querna wrote:
Using perchild as an example, many users see that it is available in 2.0
and try it out. They then complain and make silly posts on Slashdot when
it doesn't work. Why include these MPMs if no one is actively working on
or supporting them? It doesn't make sense for the 'Stable
Hi ,
I am trying to install apache 2.0.50 on Linux. Since I read is somewhere
that the current version doesn't require Open ssl. I gave in option
./configure --prefix=/home/siva/apache --enable-so --enable-cg i
--enable-info --enable-rewrite --enable-speling --enable-usertrack
--enable-deflate
Am Freitag, 3. September 2004 05:25 schrieb Paul Querna:
Do we want to include the experimental MPMs in the 2.2 GA Branch?
Currently the MPMs in server/mpm/experimental are:
- leader
- perchild
- threadpool
I hope to add the 'event' MPM to this list soon, but I have been
distracted
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 18:30:33 -0600, The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/var/www/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile /usr/bin/gcc -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wall -g -O3 -DAP_DEBUG-I.
-I/usr/source/httpd-2.1.0-rc1/os/unix
On Sep 2, 2004, at 11:25 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Do we want to include the experimental MPMs in the 2.2 GA Branch?
Currently the MPMs in server/mpm/experimental are:
- leader
- perchild
- threadpool
My personal feeling is to *not* include them in the 2.2 branch at this
time. If any of the
Hello all,
For security and loadbalancing reasons we have certain apaches running
behind a loadbalancer that does NAT. For better host security, the
user is not root and has httpd listen 1023. This setup is broken by
mod_dir behaviour when fixing omitted trailing slashes. Example:
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 10:14, V. T. Mueller, Continum wrote:
Hello all,
For security and loadbalancing reasons we have certain apaches running
behind a loadbalancer that does NAT. For better host security, the
user is not root and has httpd listen 1023. This setup is broken by
mod_dir
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 13:59, Mladen Turk wrote:
You have a simple option though - grab 2.0. Replace the modules/proxy/
tree with 2.1-dev and voila - buildconf - configure - make install.
Any docs on how to actually use the balancer? Looking at the source
isn't helping me :)
Thanks..
--
...since Friday, 03-Sep-2004 07:56:21 PDT. This is httpd-2.0.51-rc2, Sander's
latest tarball. It looks fine to me but if you notice any undesirable behavior
please let us know.
Greg
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 18:12 +0200, Matthieu Estrade wrote:
Considering some experimental stuff is sometimes stable on some
plateform and still experimental because unstable on others, it could be
better to keep them in, just for users who want to try and help. If
these modules are deleted,
Greg Ames wrote:
...since Friday, 03-Sep-2004 07:56:21 PDT. This is httpd-2.0.51-rc2,
Sander's latest tarball. It looks fine to me
actually, I see this in the log while shutting down the 2.0.50 build:
httpd in free(): warning: page is already free
httpd in free(): warning: chunk is already
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 09:55 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean... I think that, at the source
code level, all experimental modules (whether MPMs or
not) should be included (but not *built* when doing
packages).
I guess I wasn't clear. I would like to keep all of our
Paul Querna wrote:
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 18:12 +0200, Matthieu Estrade wrote:
Considering some experimental stuff is sometimes stable on some
plateform and still experimental because unstable on others, it could be
better to keep them in, just for users who want to try and help. If
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:48:15AM -0400, Greg Ames wrote:
Greg Ames wrote:
...since Friday, 03-Sep-2004 07:56:21 PDT. This is httpd-2.0.51-rc2,
Sander's latest tarball. It looks fine to me
actually, I see this in the log while shutting down the 2.0.50 build:
httpd in free(): warning:
Paul Querna wrote:
I don't think this has happened recently at all. Just look at perchild,
or any of the other experimental MPMs in the 2.0 Branch. People are not
providing patches for them.
And people won't ever provide patches for code that isn't there.
People are more likely to play around
I'm using head, with a spelling fix to mod_proxy comment (probably the
cause of the breakage) and a tweak to allow proxy connect to bypass
the balancer, and this silly testcase isn't working:
192.168.1.11 - - [03/Sep/2004:12:05:59 -0400] GET
http://127.0.0.1:10101/cgi-bin/printenv HTTP/1.0 404
--On Friday, September 3, 2004 12:14 PM -0400 Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm using head, with a spelling fix to mod_proxy comment (probably the
cause of the breakage) and a tweak to allow proxy connect to bypass
the balancer, and this silly testcase isn't working:
192.168.1.11 - -
* Florian Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
snip
Maybe replacing perchild with metuxmpm would be a good idea? metuxmpm does
basically the same, but in fact it works.
ACK.
We'd be glad to get it in the official tree.
What about contacting the developers about integrating metuxmpm
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 18:47 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Florian Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
snip
Maybe replacing perchild with metuxmpm would be a good idea? metuxmpm does
basically the same, but in fact it works.
ACK.
We'd be glad to get it in the official tree.
Testing 2.0 and 2.1 Head.
I am running a test that requires frequent ejections of cache entities:
max_cache_size and max_object_countare smaller than my sampling.
2 threads running at the concurrentlyon 2 CPUs.
Thread1(T1): an entry is ejected from the cache in cache_insert(),
resulting in a
Greetings All,
Had a couple of goes replying to a thread that asked about a doc for the
Mod_Proxy balancer, and twice qmail sent it back saying the 'subject' was
empty.
Hopefully this works.
Attached (maybe) is something I've pulled together from digging, and look to
some detailed docs in the near
-0.9. This change needs review. The coding style should stick to
the httpd guidelines. Use of sprintf into a small fixed size
buffer is unwise (even when we know it fits) .. use
apr_snprintf.
Also, we don't add comments to a credit log inside the file
(instead
Whether labeled experimental or not, it's always been very confusing
to me that the release (stable) branch has modules in it that
developers know don't work at all and therefore should not ever be
attempted to be used by any ordinary user in any way whatsoever...
Therefore I agree, stable
On Sep 3, 2004, at 6:06 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 16:06 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
-0.9. This change needs review. The coding style should stick to
the httpd guidelines.
Yes, but I did not commit a correct style patch, because that would of
been *impossible* to
26 matches
Mail list logo
