Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test Makefile.PL Changes

2004-09-27 Thread Geoffrey Young
+sub clean_files { +return [ +qw(lib/Apache/TestConfigData.pm + .mypacklist + t/TEST + ), + ]; +} [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_perl-2.0]$ perl Makefile.PL MP_APXS=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs Reading Makefile.PL

Re: Apache::Test and OpenBSD

2004-09-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Seth, please always post any A-T related questions to the httpd-test list: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/test-dev.html#Subscription_Information Seth Gordon wrote: OK, if I make the following change to Apache::TestServer sub args { my $self = shift; my $vars = $self-{config}-{vars};

Re: segfault ap_save_brigage in the latest 2.0

2004-09-27 Thread Joe Orton
Let's continue this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] since it doesn't seem like there's an httpd bug currently. On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:49:29PM -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] when it did start up it would segfault consistently when running the tests you

Re: Moving httpd-2.0 to Subversion

2004-09-27 Thread Sander Striker
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 06:13, Joe Schaefer wrote: Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Probably not worth it given all of the parallel development. Well, I'd rather see us using something like this: httpd/ apreq/ trunk/ branches/ tags/ +1, with

Re: Moving httpd-2.0 to Subversion

2004-09-27 Thread Joe Schaefer
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 06:13, Joe Schaefer wrote: [...] apreq/branches/1.3 and httpd-apreq-2 cvs can go to apreq/trunk. *nod* Correction: apreq/branches/1.x We've already released libapreq-1.3, and since we're still maintaining that codebase

Version 2.0.52 Announcement text

2004-09-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Comments anyone? Seeing all +1's and no objections, I'm planning to push this out in the next hour or two. Bill Apache HTTP Server 2.0.52 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the The Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version

Re: Version 2.0.52 Announcement text

2004-09-27 Thread Joshua Slive
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Comments anyone? Seeing all +1's and no objections, I'm planning to push this out in the next hour or two. The ?update argument to download.cgi should be changed to the date/time that you drop the files into dist/httpd/. And you should try to wait

Re: Version 2.0.52 Announcement text

2004-09-27 Thread Jess Holle
Is the final 2.0.52 identical to httpd-2.0.52-rc1.tar.gz (including version strings, etc)? [Just anxious to get cracking on 2.0.52 binaries.] -- Jess Holle William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Comments anyone? Seeing all +1's and no objections, I'm planning to push this out in the next hour or

Re: Version 2.0.52 Announcement text

2004-09-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:55 PM 9/27/2004, Joshua Slive wrote: On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Comments anyone? Seeing all +1's and no objections, I'm planning to push this out in the next hour or two. The ?update argument to download.cgi should be changed to the date/time that you drop the

Re: Version 2.0.52 Announcement text

2004-09-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 03:07 PM 9/27/2004, Jess Holle wrote: Is the final 2.0.52 identical to httpd-2.0.52-rc1.tar.gz (including version strings, etc)? [Just anxious to get cracking on 2.0.52 binaries.] Yes you can start building binaries, and push them as soon as the .tar.gz hits /dist/httpd, although they

Problems with chrooting Apache 2 and mod_auth_digest

2004-09-27 Thread Werner Schalk
Hi, I have successfully chrooted Apache 2 and everything works pretty well. Unfortunately I can't get it working with mod_auth_digest because I always end up getting the following error message: [Mon Sep 27 20:13:35 2004] [crit] (2)No such file or directory: Digest: error generating secret:

Re: segfault ap_save_brigage in the latest 2.0

2004-09-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Joe Orton wrote: Let's continue this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] since it doesn't seem like there's an httpd bug currently. On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:49:29PM -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote: Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] when it did start up it would segfault consistently when running the tests