DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34755.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35669.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Not sure if this is best posted here, or to mod_dav mailing list. But
here goes.
Has anyone looked at using mod_python to backend mod_dav, with a
similar usage to FUSE's python binding. Basically mod_dav_python.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Carpenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FCP Internet LTD
Unit 3,
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Others may know what you are talking about, but I plead
ignorance. Can
you perhaps describe further what you are talking about, how it would
be
used etc. A URL to stuff that could be read to understand similar
things
would also help.
Graham
What I am
Jim Gallacher wrote:
Barry Pederson wrote:
I think this is the general kind of thing we're looking for though,
with some mistaken pointer/memory operation.
Too bad we can't write *everything* in python. :(
You haven't been following PyPy then? :-)
David
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
buffer += bufsize;
On a second thought - yes, you're right :-)
And if he's not then there is a bug in filter_read since that is what it
does and it is very similar to _conn_read.
Jim
On 30/01/2006, at 9:11 PM, Matt Carpenter wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this is best posted here, or to mod_dav mailing list.
But here goes.
Has anyone looked at using mod_python to backend mod_dav, with a
similar usage to FUSE's python binding. Basically mod_dav_python.
Others may know what
This may be a good question to post to dev@httpd.apache.org
Grisha
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Getting a bit closer now, have next part of puzzle worked out.
Graham Dumpleton wrote ..
This is starting to look really ugly.
In _conn_read(), it first creates a bucket brigade
Graham Dumpleton wrote ..
Returning back up to _conn_read() in mod_python source code, we have
where core_input_filter() was called ap_get_brigade():
Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS;
rc = ap_get_brigade(c-input_filters, bb, mode, APR_BLOCK_READ, bufsize);
Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS;
Graham Dumpleton wrote ..
Extending the above code as:
Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS;
rc = ap_get_brigade(c-input_filters, bb, mode, APR_BLOCK_READ, bufsize);
Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS;
if (! APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS(rc)) {
PyErr_SetObject(PyExc_IOError,
Jim Gallacher wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
What I might speculate is that if the test in mod_python for the
connection handler is setup to run on a secondary listener port,
but with the primary still active, that it may trigger the problem
on other systems like Linux. Jim, you might want to
An initial few comments from a first pass through.
def _write(self, request, response, content_type='text/xml'):
request.send_http_header()
request.content_type = content_type
request.write(response)
This is technically wrong, although it doesn't matter on mod_python
Apache2 comes with APR built in; you do not need to install it separately. You are finding what a big PITA that results in.
Mark ben syverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29-Jan-06 18:05 PM
Sorry for the cross-post, but I've recompiled everything so many times I'm starting to lose track of reality...I've
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Noranis Aris
This is a user specific question. Please post it
to users@httpd.apache.org
Regards
Rüdiger
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:58:28AM -0800, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
Unfortunately no, it's preventing me from compiling 2.0.55 on a
FreeBSD6/Sempron box. For now I can either use the patch or delete the
offending half of the #ifdef, but it would be nice if it Just Worked.
O.k., I'll add this
wrt information provided by
Mladen Turk, Jim Jagielski and Andreas Wieczorek:
I'm having issues when using mod_proxy/mod_proxy_balancer and it
appears these have been alluded to on the dev mailing list:
1. apache 220 doesn't appear to use the status=d value for a balancer
member when loading
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:58:28AM -0800, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 10:50:05PM -0800, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
In December, Joe Orton posted a patch to ap_config.h that took care of
some problems with AP_INIT_TAKE1. Is there any chance this patch
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:04:02AM -, Brian Pane wrote:
Author: brianp
Date: Mon Jan 23 00:04:01 2006
New Revision: 371484
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371484view=rev
Log:
Return APR_EAGAIN instead of SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ from the mod_ssl filters;
the httpd core and other
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:58:17AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
The C++/AP_INIT_* problem was specific to 2.2 and does not affect 2.0,
please file a PR for whatever problem you are having with 2.0.
Excellent, I'm not crazy! No wonder I wouldn't repeat it :)
--
Colm MacCárthaigh
On Jan 10, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Rian Hunter wrote:
This version of Apache is principally a security and bug fix
release, and represents the best available version of Apache HTTP
Server.
That string is currently under the Apache 2.0.55 Released
section of
Joe Orton wrote:
The C++/AP_INIT_* problem was specific to 2.2 and does not affect 2.0,
please file a PR for whatever problem you are having with 2.0.
Is there some way to file a PR without creating yet another user account?
Looking back at the original problem, I'm not sure if they're the
If someone here has spare Brain/CPU cycles, could you look at the attached
code and provide feedback?
Grisha
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:04:42 -0800
From: Matt Chisholm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: contribution to mod_python: Apache +
22 matches
Mail list logo
