The issue of mod_aspdotnet

2006-02-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
A product of the cli-dev incubation effort was the open sourcing of the mod_aspdotnet connector between httpd-2.0 and Microsoft's ASP.NET engine. Some background... It is notably tied to Microsoft as the code uses a C++ IJW (It Just Works) approach to compiling native and managed code in the

Next Mission, DOA or interest?

2006-02-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
cli-dev'ers, With the cli-dev list not particularly active in mod_aspdotnet (no criticizm, this is mostly a finished module and should be discussed on that thread), I'd like to come back to the original charter and purpose for cli-dev@, and why it wasn't simply the mod_aspdotnet effort.

Re: The issue of mod_aspdotnet

2006-02-15 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 2/15/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A product of the cli-dev incubation effort was the open sourcing of the mod_aspdotnet connector between httpd-2.0 and Microsoft's ASP.NET engine. Some background... Excellent. I've been delegated by the Board to oversee our timely

Intro to mod_aspdotnet

2006-02-15 Thread Doug Dixon
Hi I'm on the dev@httpd.apache.org mailing list, and have recently been alerted to the existence of mod_aspdotnet by some posts from Bill (thanks). Sounds interesting and potentially very cool. I know a fair bit about Apache, but not about ASP.NET. I think it would be great if your

Re: Intro to mod_aspdotnet

2006-02-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Doug Dixon wrote: Hi I'm on the dev@httpd.apache.org mailing list, and have recently been alerted to the existence of mod_aspdotnet by some posts from Bill (thanks). Sounds interesting and potentially very cool. I know a fair bit about Apache, but not about ASP.NET. I think it would be

Re: Testing mod_python SVN trunk with Apache 2.2 on Win32

2006-02-15 Thread Jim Gallacher
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Hi, I've built Apache 2.2 and tested mod_python SVN trunk with it. The two register_cleanup tests fail. Apparently it's because the test code registers a cleanup function giving the current request as parameter. Of course when the cleanup function is called, the request

Re: Testing mod_python SVN trunk with Apache 2.2 on Win32

2006-02-15 Thread Jim Gallacher
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: 2006/2/15, Jim Gallacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Hi, I've built Apache 2.2 and tested mod_python SVN trunk with it. The two register_cleanup tests fail. Apparently it's because the test code registers a cleanup function giving the current request as

[SECURITY] A Security Issue with FileSession in 3.2.7

2006-02-15 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
If you are using the recently released mod_python 3.2.7 please beware that a security issue was discovered in the FileSession code. You are vulnerable only if you are using mod_python 3.2.7 AND you are using FileSession to keep sessions. FileSession is new in 3.2.7 and is not enabled by

Re: mutex dir?

2006-02-15 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Jim Gallacher wrote .. If the settings are going to be a generic key/value like in PythonOption, but only for purposes of the mod_python system itself, maybe it should be called PythonSystemOption. Prefer PythonSystemOption as Module is too confusing to me given you have both Apache

Re: mutex dir?

2006-02-15 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Jim Gallacher wrote .. I have a better option (pun intended). :-) We do not need a new directive. Instead use existing PythonOption directive. That could work. In the handler code for the directive, it can look at the value of the cmd_parms-path and determine if it is being used

Re: mutex dir?

2006-02-15 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Graham Dumpleton wrote .. Graham Dumpleton wrote .. How does req.server.get_options() differ from req.server.get_config(), which already exists? I still see what is in get_config() as special, ie., the values for actual directives. Just don't think it is good to mix them. Looking

[OT] Linux in the News

2006-02-15 Thread Mark Galbreath
This just in: http://ct.enews.eweek.com/rd/cts?d=186-3209-8-85-114956-376644-0-0-0-1 ...like this is news or something. Mark-|-kraM

2.06 - 2.07 Fedora Core 4 Yum upgrade broke something?

2006-02-15 Thread Client Services of New York, LLC
Throws an Internal Server now. And returns [Tue Feb 14 21:43:44 2006] [error] [client 24.195.xx.xxx] Conflicting information Any gotchas I'm not seeing in the docs that could be responsible? Mike -- Mike LiemanClient Services of New York, L.L.C.[EMAIL PROTECTED]518-496-8431

Re: corrupt cookie kills mod-perl / apreq

2006-02-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
Jonathan Vanasco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BUT it brings up this issue - a corrupt cookie of this sort seems to call a die() in modperl once libapreq attempts to parse it. i'd say 50% of the dies are met with a segfault. i don't know why its not a 1:1 ratio. It's supposed to die, but

Re: 2.06 - 2.07 Fedora Core 4 Yum upgrade broke something?

2006-02-15 Thread Client Services of New York, LLC
On 2/15/06, Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks, Joe. I'll take a look at those, and follow up later. -- Mike LiemanClient Services of New York, L.L.C.[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.07 and Mac OSX

2006-02-15 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
[ This was sent earlier, accidentally, from a non-subscribed address ] Mac OSX 10.4.5 httpd 2.0.55 mod_perl 2.02 libapreq2.07 Has anyone got this working? It keeps failing on make test util...FAILED tests 36-37 Failed 2/89 tests, 97.75% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail

Apache1.3.33 on Linux 4.0 Startup Behaviour not consistent.

2006-02-15 Thread Mukesh_Kumar02
Hi, I have a library which loads fine on Linux 3.0 with Apache 1.3.33 and it starts well. But in case of Linux 4.0 it is behaving inconsistently i.e sometimes it starts sometimes it doesnt. I want to know whether there is some major difference between the process creation methods in

AW: [Patch] Keep Alive not workwing with mod_proxy (PR38602)

2006-02-15 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VIS
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski No regressions... Now that this has been passed successfully, do you see need for any further discussion / changes before I commit it or should I commit to the trunk and we continue our further changes / discussions there? Regards

Re: AW: [Patch] Keep Alive not workwing with mod_proxy (PR38602)

2006-02-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote: Von: Jim Jagielski=20 =20 No regressions... =20 Now that this has been passed successfully, do you see need for any further discussion / changes before I commit it or should I commit to the trunk and we continue our further

Re: 2.06 - 2.07 Fedora Core 4 Yum upgrade broke something?

2006-02-15 Thread Client Services of New York, LLC
On 2/15/06, Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:In particular, your POST_MAX argument.You'll get this errorif that's larger than 64M. The web app in question uses: $session{req} = Apache2::Request-new($r, POST_MAX = 1024 *

AW: AW: [Patch] Keep Alive not workwing with mod_proxy (PR38602)

2006-02-15 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VIS
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski I vote to commit and use that as the continue point for more development :) Excellent. I will do so tonight German time. Currently I am away from my development env as you may have noticed from my nicely formated Outlook mails :-).

Re: AW: AW: [Patch] Keep Alive not workwing with mod_proxy (PR38602)

2006-02-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'll do it, no prob. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote: -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski=20 =20 =20 I vote to commit and use that as the continue point for more development :) Excellent. I will do so tonight German time. Currently I am

Re: Upcoming changes in mod_mbox repository

2006-02-15 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 2/14/06, Maxime Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Otherwise, I'd like to have some more detailled explanations (or a mail reference to) on this veto. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-mbox-dev/200504.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] HTH. -- justin

The issue of mod_aspdotnet

2006-02-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
A product of the cli-dev incubation effort was the open sourcing of the mod_aspdotnet connector between httpd-2.0 and Microsoft's ASP.NET engine. Some background... It is notably tied to Microsoft as the code uses a C++ IJW (It Just Works) approach to compiling native and managed code in the

Re: The issue of mod_aspdotnet

2006-02-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: * It's time to move mod_aspdotnet into the 'core'. Not as a default installed module, perhaps not even in the modules/arch/win32/ tree (it would increase the size of the unix distributions for no gain), but simply consider it where it lays in svn as part

Re: The issue of mod_aspdotnet

2006-02-15 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 2/15/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A product of the cli-dev incubation effort was the open sourcing of the mod_aspdotnet connector between httpd-2.0 and Microsoft's ASP.NET engine. Some background... Excellent. I've been delegated by the Board to oversee our timely

Re: The issue of mod_aspdotnet

2006-02-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On 2/15/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The second major change to be made is driven by the httpd-2.2 proxy framework. Because all applications are in effect proxied from the front end server, the fit of mod_proxy_aspdotnet should be self-evident.

[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Feb 15 23:50:41 2006

2006-02-15 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-02 16:28:52 -0500 (Thu, 02 Feb 2006) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS Documentation status is maintained

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Feb 15 23:49:09 2006

2006-02-15 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-04 14:10:00 -0500 (Sat, 04 Feb 2006) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Documentation status is

Re: Next Mission, DOA or interest?

2006-02-15 Thread Tonko Juricic
Re: poll * I will help author the module * I will help test the module, including writing tests and examples * I will help document the module and it's API Sorry, other issues and considerations mentioned in recent and related exchanges tend to be somewhat high-level for me and I have