Nicolas
A while back you made the following change:
r378072 | nlehuen | 2006-02-16 06:41:25 +1100 (Thu, 16 Feb 2006) | 5
lines
- Fixed the unit tests for apache.register_cleanup
server.register_cleanup. Ther
e is not way it could have passed before, yet it did ???
- Corrected the
On 03/08/2006 03:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h
===
--- modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h (revision 384045)
+++ modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h (working copy)
@@ -301,6 +301,11 @@
#if APR_HAS_THREADS
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 23:57, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Quoting Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nice. If I were to work on the patches along those lines, is there a
starting point maybe? An initial set of uncommitted patches? API
suggestions?
OK, I'll have stab then. Here is what I had in
Oops, my mistake, I haven't seen that the hidden version of the
function was called instead of the public one...
In any case there is a real problem with the unit tests since they
passed before my change and still pass now.
I still would like to refactor the unit tests but I've been quite busy
On Mar 7, 2006, at 11:05 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Shouldn't we make the size of FLUSH_WAIT configurable somehow
(possibly in a next step)?
I think that makes a lot of sense as well, but wanted to
hold off on that until we got some agreement that making
the whole flushing aspect
Hi,
Does anybody know, how to get via the commandline the version info of a
loaded Apache PHP module 'libphp4.so'?
Sierk
Sierk Bornemann | Hannover | Germany
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://sierkbornemann.de/
Hi all,
I have some questions concerning the followings logs. Architecture is:
Apache/mod_jk/Tomcat/MySQL. May be somes are normal. Google searches
do not give me clear answers.
Thanks in advance !!
1. Apache - mod_jk.log
[Wed Mar 08 15:34:40 2006] [error] jk_child_init::mod_jk.c (2312):
Thanks for your quick answer. Note that this log appears even there is
no management manipulation on Tomcat (reloading, deploying, ...).
Thanks
Pascal
On 3/8/06, Tim Lucia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The last one (4) results from not deregistering the object mentioned from
the JMX server.
When the Win32 source package was generated for 2.0.55, what versions of
srclib/apr, apr-util and apr-iconv were used? Is it safe to assume that
httpd releases, such as 2.0.55, are built against tagged apr* versions,
rather than trunk?
Trent.
Trent Nelson wrote:
When the Win32 source package was generated for 2.0.55, what versions of
srclib/apr, apr-util and apr-iconv were used? Is it safe to assume that
httpd releases, such as 2.0.55, are built against tagged apr* versions,
rather than trunk?
It wasn't safe to assume that until
Any other comments about the patch? Should I just
commit the revised one and we can tweak from
there...
On 03/08/2006 09:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Any other comments about the patch? Should I just
commit the revised one and we can tweak from
there...
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
Quoting Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, that's an option. But wouldn't it perhaps be more elegant
to use a container?
DBDConnection alias
DBDriverfoo
DBDParams ..
etc
/DBDConnection
And if the container is optional, we have back-compatibility for free.
On 3/7/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feh. No way. The argument would hold true if mod_jk
did not provide just the sort of control that you say
we shouldn't provide to users/admins, and control that
*varies* from setup to setup.
Why must we offer a shiny knob that the average
On 3/8/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other comments about the patch? Should I just
commit the revised one and we can tweak from
there...
As I said in my other email, turning flushing off means that we expose
ourselves to a DoS. Ouch. -- justin
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-02 16:28:52 -0500 (Thu, 02 Feb 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-04 14:10:00 -0500 (Sat, 04 Feb 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
Hi all,
I am working on Linux(SuSe, MACHTYPE=i686-suse-linux). I have two server
Apache-2.0.48 webserver and an existing server i.e echo server(TCP/IP not
webserver) which is accessible by netcat(client) by sending a string and get
echo back that string. Now I wants to embedded echo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Justin Erenkrantz
Until the protocol is fixed, we should do the right thing -
and that means we shouldn't ever allow the entire response to
be spooled in memory. -- justin
Actually we do not do this. The original code did this which lead to a
19 matches
Mail list logo
