mod_cache responsibilities vs mod_xxx_cache provider responsibilities

2006-09-13 Thread Issac Goldstand
Hi all, I've been hacking at mod_cache a bit, and was surprised to find that part of the decision to serve previously cached content or not was being made by the backend provider and not mod_cache; specifically, the expiration date of the content seems to be checked by mod_disk_cache (as part of

Re: svn commit: r442758 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators: mod_cgi.c mod_cgid.c

2006-09-13 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/13/2006 01:44 AM, wrote: Author: niq Date: Tue Sep 12 16:44:12 2006 New Revision: 442758 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=442758 Log: PR 31759 (mutated) - reported by Jo Rhett Don't return apr_status_t error value from input filter chain. Modified:

Re: mod_cache responsibilities vs mod_xxx_cache provider responsibilities

2006-09-13 Thread Davi Arnaut
On 13/09/2006, at 16:29, Issac Goldstand wrote: Hi all, I've been hacking at mod_cache a bit, and was surprised to find that part of the decision to serve previously cached content or not was being made by the backend provider and not mod_cache; specifically, the expiration date of the

Re: svn commit: r442758 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators: mod_cgi.c mod_cgid.c

2006-09-13 Thread Nick Kew
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Wouldn't it make sense to return OK even if rv != APR_SUCCESS in the case that c-aborted is set, just like in the default handler? I'm not sure. Presumably if c-aborted is set, then we have no client to respond to, so this is just

Re: svn commit: r442758 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators: mod_cgi.c mod_cgid.c

2006-09-13 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/13/2006 10:17 PM, Nick Kew wrote: On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Wouldn't it make sense to return OK even if rv != APR_SUCCESS in the case that c-aborted is set, just like in the default handler? I'm not sure. Presumably if c-aborted is set, then we

Re: svn commit: r442758 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators: mod_cgi.c mod_cgid.c

2006-09-13 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 9/13/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Wouldn't it make sense to return OK even if rv != APR_SUCCESS in the case that c-aborted is set, just like in the default handler? I'm not sure. Presumably if c-aborted is set, then we

Re: svn commit: r442758 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators: mod_cgi.c mod_cgid.c

2006-09-13 Thread Nick Kew
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 22:31, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 9/13/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Wouldn't it make sense to return OK even if rv != APR_SUCCESS in the case that c-aborted is set, just like in the default

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Sep 13 23:48:18 2006

2006-09-13 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-09-13 15:45:30 -0400 (Wed, 13 Sep 2006) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Documentation status is

[STATUS] (httpd-trunk) Wed Sep 13 23:47:26 2006

2006-09-13 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-08-22 16:41:03 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS Documentation status is maintained