Windows compiler options

2007-11-27 Thread Sam Carleton
I have been developing my module with VC6, fore I know that because of the manifest files VC8 is not a viable enviornment, what about VC7.1 (VS2003)? I have that now and am wondering if I can upgrade from VC6 to VC7.1. Sam

Re: Windows compiler options

2007-11-27 Thread Issac Goldstand
For what it's worth, I'm pretty sure that the latest versions of apxs for windows handle manifests... Issac Sam Carleton wrote: I have been developing my module with VC6, fore I know that because of the manifest files VC8 is not a viable enviornment, what about VC7.1 (VS2003)? I have that

memory leak in 2.2.x balancer?

2007-11-27 Thread Jeff Trawick
looks like a leak to me; what do you think? Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c === --- modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c (revision 598305) +++ modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c (working copy) @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@

Re: memory leak in 2.2.x balancer?

2007-11-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Worse than a leak; conf-pool should be const, touching it explodes the copy-on-write semantics of the conf pool memory (which otherwise is a single common resource). There are better pools to abuse, if unavoidable, such as process pool. Jeff Trawick wrote: looks like a leak to me; what do you

Re: memory leak in 2.2.x balancer?

2007-11-27 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jeff Trawick Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2007 14:21 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: memory leak in 2.2.x balancer? looks like a leak to me; what do you think? Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c

Re: memory leak in 2.2.x balancer?

2007-11-27 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Nov 27, 2007 8:47 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jeff Trawick Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2007 14:21 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: memory leak in 2.2.x balancer? looks like a leak to me; what do you think?

Re: memory leak in 2.2.x balancer?

2007-11-27 Thread jean-frederic clere
Jeff Trawick wrote: On Nov 27, 2007 8:47 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jeff Trawick Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2007 14:21 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: memory leak in 2.2.x balancer? looks like a leak to me; what do

time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ?

2007-11-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
With APR now out, I think we're close to releasing 1.3.40 and 2.2.7... Anyone opposed with that gameplan?

compiling using gcc directly rather than using apxs

2007-11-27 Thread Subra A Narayanan
Hello folks, I have run in to a problem and hope someone can help me out. I am using Apache HTTP server version 2.0.61 I have written a simple test module called mod_my.c in which all I do is printout the contents of request-parsed_uri structure which if of type apr_uri_t. The module works just

Re: svn commit: r598669 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/experimental/config.m4

2007-11-27 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/27/2007 04:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: rpluem Date: Tue Nov 27 07:18:34 2007 New Revision: 598669 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=598669view=rev Log: * mod_substitute is now below filters and no longer in experimental. Modified:

Re: time for 1.3.40 and 2.2.7 ?

2007-11-27 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/27/2007 07:26 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: With APR now out, I think we're close to releasing 1.3.40 and 2.2.7... Anyone opposed with that gameplan? Sounds very good for me. I think there is only one issue left that needs fixing: The fd leaking on Windows for which Bill proposed a backport

Re: memory leak in 2.2.x balancer?

2007-11-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 27, 2007, at 8:20 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: looks like a leak to me; what do you think? Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c === --- modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c (revision 598305) +++

Re: memory leak in 2.2.x balancer?

2007-11-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 27, 2007, at 10:16 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: On Nov 27, 2007 8:47 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jeff Trawick Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2007 14:21 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: memory

version.ent must be bumped before 2.2.7 tagged

2007-11-27 Thread Takashi Sato
I posted the notice to doc@ 2 week ago. Now 2.2.7 is coming so I'm posting this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/manual/style/version.ent http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/version.ent version.ent must be

Re: Expression Parser API?

2007-11-27 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:25:54 +0200 (SAST) Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, November 26, 2007 4:18 pm, Nick Kew wrote: mod_include has an expression parser (parse_expr at line 1125 in /trunk/). Many other modules implement simpler parsers for a range of purposes. It

Re: Expression Parser API?

2007-11-27 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:31:49 + Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've extracted the expression parser from mod_include into an ap_expr.c file. It was surprisingly straightforward, and loses none of the functionality of mod_include[1]. Now at http://people.apache.org/~niq/ap_expr.c With

Re: svn commit: r598669 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/experimental/config.m4

2007-11-27 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Ruediger, On 11/27/2007 04:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it would be good if someone with a deeper understanding of Novell makefiles could have a look at the Novell makefiles in experimental/. I guess they are now broken too, because of the move of mod_substitute. yes, but that